Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Decisions, Decisions...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MsBrainy - 02 Mar 2008 20:46 GMT
I need to make a decision, after struggling with the matter for some time.

After 3 eye surgeries (macular hole in Oct 2006, retinal detachment in Dec
2006 and cataract in July 2007 -- all in my right eye) I experienced
occasional vertical double vision, mainly in the evenings. It was torturous
at times and accompanied with pain, but then improved with the passing of
time and diminished, yet still occurs sometimes, always associated with eye
fatigue.  At present I suffer from it only seldom.  

My limited understanding is that my multiple surgeries have weakened my right
eye muscles to affect the alignment with the left eye when my eyes are tired
after a day-long usage.  I have made efforts to sleep longer hours (I used to
sleep about 5-6 hours, but now I sleep 6-7 hours), which seems to be a major
factor in the diminishing symptoms.  It’s also possible that my brain has
learned how to cope with the double image.  

I have no double vision most of the time, and since my ophthalmologist sees
me during the day hours, he could not detect any problem, but referred me to
a specialist – the only one in town, and one of two in the entire state of
Arizona.  After 3½ months wait I finally got to see the specialist, who
prescribed 3D prism.  I couldn’t get much information from him because he
used me as a subject for a student whom he was training, so I was instructed
to shut up.

About 6 months ago (after the cat surgery) I got 2 new pairs of glasses – one
for “normal” use and the other for computer.  I use the computer glasses most
of the time, and only rarely use the regular pair for driving.  I can now get
the new Rx for no fee, except the small extra for the prism, but this option
is about to expire very soon.  

My optician suggested a trial, using a thin stick-on film with prism for a
while.  I have found that switching from prism back to no-prism is not
comfortable, even after a short time with the prism.  My vision with the
prism is OK, but then removing the glasses is stressful.  My conclusion is
that once I start wearing the prism there is no way back, and I am doomed to
have double vision when I remove my glasses (which now I do regularly –
sometimes for reading, and certainly in the shower etc. – with no problem or
difficulty).  Actually my preseent vision without glasses is sufficient for
functioning comfortably in my familiar home environment.  It’s obvious that I
cannot limit the use of the prism to the evening or to the now-rare occasions
of double vision -- it always or never.

I am running out of time.  Should I obey the new Rx and become a permanent
prism-subject who must experience diplopic symptoms when glasses cannot be
worn, or should I tolerate the rare diplopic episodes (which go away
overnight), knowing that I can always change my decision and get new prism
glasses?  If it was not for the cost of new glasses, I would choose the
latter and opt to prism only when I feel that I cannot function without it
anymore – but will have to pay the full price for 2 pairs of glasses, which
now I can get for no additional cost.  Any advice?

Signature

MsBrainy

RT - 02 Mar 2008 22:54 GMT
> I am running out of time.  Should I obey the new Rx and become a permanent
> prism-subject who must experience diplopic symptoms when glasses cannot be
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> anymore – but will have to pay the full price for 2 pairs of glasses, which
> now I can get for no additional cost.  Any advice?

seems like a no brainer, brainy. get the free glasses now and wear them
if and when you are ready later. just because you get your free pair now
doesn't mean you have to wear them. nor does it preclude you from
wearing them later when you feel that you cannot function anymore
without them.

If they are free, what do you have to lose by getting them?

Signature

~RT

MsBrainy - 02 Mar 2008 23:08 GMT
Sorry for your misunderstanding.  Perhaps I failed to fully explain.

I am not getting a free pair of glasses.  I am entitled to a
replacement/correction of the present pair(s) within the first 6 months.  The
new lenses with the prism will replace my existing ones, so I will have no
choice but wearing the prism glasses and no going back.  I will end up either
with prism or without, not both, unless I buy and pay for an ADDITIONAL pair.
I hope this is clearer.

>> I am running out of time.  Should I obey the new Rx and become a permanent
>> prism-subject who must experience diplopic symptoms when glasses cannot be
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>If they are free, what do you have to lose by getting them?

Signature

MsBrainy

RT - 02 Mar 2008 23:22 GMT
> Sorry for your misunderstanding.  Perhaps I failed to fully explain.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> with prism or without, not both, unless I buy and pay for an ADDITIONAL pair.
> I hope this is clearer.

Then I would say wait until you are ready and sure or just pay for the
additional pair now. It's only money. Really. Don't feel pressured by an
arbitrary 6 month entitlement. It's like being swayed into an impulse
buy because something is on sale.

Signature

~RT

MsBrainy - 02 Mar 2008 23:37 GMT
>Then I would say wait until you are ready and sure or just pay for the
>additional pair now. It's only money. Really. Don't feel pressured by an
>arbitrary 6 month entitlement. It's like being swayed into an impulse
>buy because something is on sale.

Yes and no.  I feel that I don't need the prism most of the time, but the
specialist doc determined that I do.  Unfortunately, he was busy teaching his
trainee and could not attend to my inquiries.

But you are right, it's only a matter of money.  That is, in the event I
choose to use my own judgment rather than following the doctor's instructions.

Signature

MsBrainy

p.clarkii@gmail.com - 03 Mar 2008 05:13 GMT
> I need to make a decision, after struggling with the matter for some time.
>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>
> Message posted via MedKB.comhttp://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/vision/200803/1

the only value of adding prism to your prescription is to alleviate
your symptoms.  since they have alleviated themselves via additional
rest, adaptation, or some other means, then prism isn't of much value
to you now.  and since you have experienced adaptation to the prism
(i.e. you have an unpleasant period of readjustment when you take off
the prism) I wouldn't recommend it now.  Prism adaptation is indeed a
well-known phenomenon.

by not including prism in your spectacle prescription, you are NOT
doing long-term damage to your vision.  prism is only a way to
alleviate unwanted unpleasant symptoms and is not any kind of cure.

seems like you know the answer.  ditch the prism-- for now.
MsBrainy - 03 Mar 2008 06:40 GMT
>the only value of adding prism to your prescription is to alleviate
>your symptoms.  since they have alleviated themselves via additional
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>seems like you know the answer.  ditch the prism-- for now.

Thank you Thank you Thank you!

Signature

MsBrainy


Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.