Medical Forum / General / Vision / February 2008
nice group
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Jim - 15 Feb 2008 03:02 GMT i'm coming up to having cataract surgery in the not so distant future, and so am reading a lot here. It's something I'll have to do eventually, but it is a scary thing.
other than that, I don't have anything to say.
.
The Real Bev - 15 Feb 2008 03:37 GMT > i'm coming up to having cataract surgery in the not so distant future, > and so am reading a lot here. It's something I'll have to do eventually, > but it is a scary thing. I don't know anybody who was sorry they had it done.
You need to decide whether you want your "new" vision to be set for near or far or somewhere in between. My mom's doc decided for her without asking and she was pretty angry when she found out -- she would have chosen distance rather than near vision.
 Signature Cheers, Bev ----------------------------------------- "Not everyone can be above average so why shouldn't we be the ones to suck?" --Anonymous School Board Member
Jim - 16 Feb 2008 03:25 GMT eye reply
Thanks for all the replies.
I wrote a what really turned into a long reply to this, then dumped it. The short( er ) version is I'm 53, have congenital nuclear subcapsular cataracts. Up until about age 43 or so they didn't affect my vision at all. Thru my mid to late 40's they became quite a bother, mostly from ghost images. Ghosts, double images, in each eye. First the right then followed a few years later in the left. The right eye wasn't so bad, and after about a year it cleared up, the double went away. The left was much worse. I may may still have a double in it under some lighting conditions. Of course I see big flares at night, but I'm not out a lot at night, so that isn't a big issue. What is a problem is that because of my pupils getting smaller with age and the cataracts being in the center of my lenses, my vision blurs in bright light. Eventually that will force me to go under the knife.
In my 40's and early 50's I went thru the usual many pairs of lenses, and several eye doctors. My vision isn't awful, -1.75 and -2.0 is the correction, so I'm slightly nearsighted. I have nice usable pair of progressive bifocals I wear when I'm out and about. When I'm home I don't wear the glasses and function just fine.
When I do get the IOL's I suppose I'll go with distance. I've read that's " normal " and more likely to turn out ok. Then I'll need reading glasses. If I were sure they would hit the mark, I might consider something that focused at about arms length, maybe 20 inches, just barely farther than where my eyes now naturally focus, about 14 inches or so. I mean, hey, I'm an old guy, what do I need to be able to see miles away for ?
My dad had his eyes done this winter. It'll be fun to see how he likes his IOL's, both eyes focus at distance. His experience will give me a little more info on what I'd go with. In the mean time, I'll read here now and then.
I guess what keeps me from acting is that I can still see fine ( not perfect but fine ) when working with my computer and around home. Then again, once I have them done, I'm sure I'll see much better overall and will feel quite silly about putting it off .
jim d
William Stacy, O.D. - 16 Feb 2008 08:29 GMT You have just the right attitude. My advice is to seek out the best surgeon you can find (the one who does at least several cataracts per week, and the one who won't insist that you get multifocal or "focusing" IOLs.) Stay away from those. Have your surgeon shoot for about -.50 on the first eye, then -0.12 or -0.25 on the second. I got Technis prolate optics (corrected for spherical aberration) and love them. You will probably have better vision post op than you have *ever* had in your life.
w.stacy, o.d.
> eye reply > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > jim d Jim - 16 Feb 2008 21:02 GMT > You have just the right attitude. My advice is to seek out the best > surgeon you can find (the one who does at least several cataracts per [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > w.stacy, o.d. Thanks for the advice.
Would the purpose of the -.50 be to move the focus distance in a bit, make it arms length or a bit less ... or .. is that a safety margin so that i don't end up with my eye focusing from, say, 6 feet and out ?
Perhaps you could elaborate ?
I have no doubt I'll be real happy once I take the plunge, but I want to be as informed as can be going in. I'm actually lucky that I didn't do this 2 years ago when I was first really considering it. At that time I had my heart set on multifocals. Sure, they might have been fine, then again maybe not.
At this point I'm looking at normal IOL's, just need to decide if I want to do something other than focus at distance, and the risks associated with that.
jim d
William Stacy, O.D. - 18 Feb 2008 02:40 GMT More the safety margin. You do not want to end up hyperopic after cat. surg., because then there is no distance that you can see clearly without glasses. But also, you're used to being myopic, and you might miss it. A little myopia is a good thing, esp. for those of us over 40 years of age.
Re multifocals, my big objection is that at least half of the light entering your eye from any distance is significantly out of focus. If glasses are absolutely abhorrent to you, you might go for that mess, but I wouldn't, and I think most older people would prefer the sharpness of single vision IOLs, even if it means some reliance on glasses.
If you ever plan on driving at night, multifocal IOLs are the worst idea of all.
w.stacy, o.d.
> Would the purpose of the -.50 be to move the focus distance in a bit, > make it arms length or a bit less ... or .. is that a safety margin so [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > jim d David Robins, MD - 18 Feb 2008 06:38 GMT In lifelong myopic pts, esp if they are older and more concerned with in-the-house vision without glasses than driving/golfing without glasses, I tend to go even a little more myopic - 0.75, sometimes even -1.00 if they like cooking, etc without glasses. Unlike some, I don't knee-jerk aim for plano (zero) as my standard for everyone.
Some of it is the safety margin you mention - I always aim a bit myopic (-0.25 to -0.50). One reason I seldom aim for zero like a lot of surgeons do - they don't realize the standard deviation of their outcomes. I recalculate mine frequently, and despite immersion A-scan or IOL-Master, it is about +/- 0.5D - 0.6D, which I understand is pretty standard. Of course, there are those who may be more than 1 S.D. off, esp if they have very short or very long eyes, or have had LASIK.
PS. Don't get me started on IOL calculation after LASIK - this is an epidemic that is just starting, and it is fraught with uncertainty, despite using Pentacam measurement and using multiple formulas, etc.
David Robins, MD Board certified Ophthalmologist Pediatric ophthalmology and adult strabismus subspecialty
On 2/17/08 6:43 PM, in article dd6uj.900$pl4.450@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net,
> More the safety margin. You do not want to end up hyperopic after cat. > surg., because then there is no distance that you can see clearly [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] >> >> jim d otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 18 Feb 2008 15:43 GMT Dear Dr. Robins,
Your opinion on their visual acuity.
What a "target" of -3/4 to -1 diopters (after IOL) would you say that there visual acuity is in the range of 20/40 or better.
Or would you say a target of -1/2 diopter would provide VA of 20/40, i.e., naked eye vision required to pass the DMV test.
I am considering catarack surgery, and I think I would prefer clear distant vision, and the use of the plus for near.
Also, how "bad" does your vision have to be for the surgeon to autorize surgery (i.e., medicade payment)?
Thanks,
Otis
> In lifelong myopic pts, esp if they are older and more concerned with > in-the-house vision without glasses than driving/golfing without glasses, I [quoted text clipped - 56 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Jim - 18 Feb 2008 20:46 GMT > Also, how "bad" does your vision have to be for the surgeon > to autorize surgery (i.e., medicade payment)? Otis,
I'm not one of the experts ( doctors ) here, I asked the original question, but still your comments interested me.
My vision is failing in a way that they can't correct with lenses. Smallish cataracts dead in the center of my pupils. The many and weird things I see ( and can't see ) are too creepy to talk about. The worst being ghost images. Luckily that isn't happening a lot now, but if it starts again, I'm off to the eye surgeon right away. I'm really far past when I should have had mine taken care of.
In the mean time, I am learning what I can and mentally preparing myself. What I've found out here about possibly having them " focused " slightly nearsighted will probably let me end up a lot happier than if I just said... eh, do whatever. I live indoors. I work indoors. I've been nearsighted my whole life, and I'm used to it ;-)
My dad ( 76 ) just had his eyes done. The reason was he wouldn't have been able to pass the drivers exam anymore, glasses or no.
jim d
otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 18 Feb 2008 15:53 GMT Dear Dr. Robins,
Subject: How does an ophthamologist determine when cataract surgery is required (medicade payment)?
1. Your judgment on the resultant visual acuity.
With a "target" of -3/4 to -1 diopters (after IOL) would you say that there visual acuity would be in the range of 20/40 or better?
Or would you say a target of -1/2 diopter would provide VA of 20/40, i.e., naked eye vision required to pass the DMV test, of reading 3/4 inches letters at 20 feet.
2. Conditions for authorizing cadaract surgery.
I am nearsighed, and look forward to "clearing" my vision with the IOL. But I know that can not be the reason for cataract surgery.
I think I would prefer clear distant vision, and the use of the plus for near.
Also, how "bad" does your vision have to be for the surgeon to authorize surgery (i.e., medicade payment)?
Thanks for your opinion and judgment.
Otis
> In lifelong myopic pts, esp if they are older and more concerned with > in-the-house vision without glasses than driving/golfing without glasses, I [quoted text clipped - 56 lines] > > - Show quoted text - David Robins, MD - 19 Feb 2008 03:36 GMT On 2/18/08 7:53 AM, in article 6d7d1111-6747-417b-973f-7461ddf7c7dd@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com,
> Dear Dr. Robins, > > Subject: How does an ophthamologist determine when > cataract surgery is required (medicade payment)? Used to be one had to have 20/50 or worse vision, and they would investiate the surgeon if that was not the case. Now, it is when visual symptoms are significant enough to bother the patient. Glare, for example, or multiple images, can be significant, yet not show up as meaureable on the eye chart. Visual symptoms just have to be documented.
Really, it is the patient, not the doctor, who determines when it is time to operate. Basically, by talking to the patient. What the cataract looks like, or what the eyechart vision is, in a dark room, does not determine it. Of course, the decreased vision needs be due to the cataract to recommend operating. I have seen clear lenses emoved for decreased vision, when it was clearly the macular degeneration that was the problem, not a cataract.
> 1. Your judgment on the resultant visual acuity. > > With a "target" of -3/4 to -1 diopters (after IOL) would you say that > there visual acuity would be in the range of 20/40 or better? -1.00 would probably not give you 20/40, whereas -0.75 might. It is individual, however, partly due to pupil size, etc.
> Or would you say a target of -1/2 diopter would provide VA of > 20/40, i.e., naked eye vision required to pass the DMV test, > of reading 3/4 inches letters at 20 feet. -0.50 most like would pass the 20/40 test.
> 2. Conditions for authorizing cadaract surgery. > > I am nearsighed, and look forward to "clearing" my vision > with the IOL. But I know that can not be the > reason for cataract surgery. Reason for surgery general has to be an impact on the patient that is bothering them to the point that they feel they need surgery, or impacting their driving, etc. However, I do not deal with MediCare and I don't deal with insurance companies since I work at Kaiser, so I don't know how strict or picky they get elsewhere. At Kaiser, there is little government oversight of the doctor-patient interaction. Therefore, we generally do what seems to be in the patient's best interest.
> I think I would prefer > clear distant vision, and the use of the plus for near. > > Also, how "bad" does your vision have to be for the surgeon > to authorize surgery (i.e., medicade payment)? See above.
> Thanks for your opinion and judgment. > [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] >> >> - Show quoted text - otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 19 Feb 2008 05:12 GMT Dear Dr. Robins,
Thanks for your kind review. The information is of considerable value to me.
Sincerely,
Otis
> On 2/18/08 7:53 AM, in article > 6d7d1111-6747-417b-973f-7461ddf7c...@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com, [quoted text clipped - 121 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Dan Abel - 15 Feb 2008 05:08 GMT > i'm coming up to having cataract surgery in the not so distant future, > and so am reading a lot here. It's something I'll have to do eventually, > but it is a scary thing. > > other than that, I don't have anything to say. That's actually quite a lot. From my own personal experience (I've had both eyes done, five years apart), the more I learned, the better I felt about the whole thing. I talked to people at work, friends, my OD and of course, the surgeon who was going to do it. All contributed good information, although the final word was from the surgeon. Pay particular attention to Bev's advice about what power to get. If you appear unknowledgeable about the procedure or unaware of your options, the doctor will often just chose this for you. You will have the benefit of the surgeon's experience with many patients, but as with many things related to vision correction, it has a lot to do with personal preference. The big difference is that if you don't like your glasses or corrects, you can just get new ones. Once the cataract surgery is over, there is no tweaking. Any change requires a complete new surgery, and doctors are reluctant to do these. Worse yet, although cataract surgery is covered by many insurance plans, once it is done, the cataract is fixed, and any further surgery for vision correction is often not covered by insurance.
 Signature Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA dabel@sonic.net
otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 15 Feb 2008 13:29 GMT Dear Jim,
I am in the same "boat" you are in.
All surgery is risky. It would be good if you know some people who have had the sugery -- and the results. It is true that some are better than others.
It is necessary, and if the internal lens power is chosen correctly, it truly does "correct" nearsightedness.
Please keep on posting your thoughts -- we would all be interested in your experience.
Best,
Otis
> i'm coming up to having cataract surgery in the not so distant future, > and so am reading a lot here. It's something I'll have to do eventually, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > . MadStamper - 19 Feb 2008 05:33 GMT > GUEST wrote > i'm coming up to having cataract surgery in the not so distan future,
> and so am reading a lot here. It's something I'll have to d eventually,
> but it is a scary thing. > > other than that, I don't have anything to say. > > . Hi Jim, I'm 32 and had my second cataract surgery jus last month and found your post when I was doing a search on bifoca glasses. Sounds like you are getting some great advice here that wish I had known about when I went in for my first cataract surger several years ago. Neither my retinologist who referred me to th ophthamologist who performed the first surgery never discussed th options for my nearer vision, and my current ophth chose an implan that matched the first one so I am stuck with needing +2.5 ~+2.7 readers
I've been nearsighted all my life (as the inflammation and cataract i my 'reading eye' got worse I joked that I read by smell because of ho close I had to hold things to be able to read them :) ) -- as result, since my second surgery it's been pretty frustrating to hav to run get my reading glasses to cook following a recipe, use th remote control for the DVD player, read the Get Fuzzy page-a-da calendar on my way out the door to work, etc. Even slicing produc needs the reading glasses. Don't get me wrong, having to use readin glasses is *vastly* preferable to being blind!! I've just gotten ver used to being able to see and read whatever I want if I only get clos enough to it, and making the change to the opposite is a littl uncomfortable
I definitely know what you mean about the prospect of surgery bein scary. One way of trying to minimise this for you would be to as your doc to walk you through the day of surgery and the followin day, what to expect the following week, etc. I can post some inf about my two surgeries, if you would find that helpful
Jim - 19 Feb 2008 15:11 GMT > I can post some info > about my two surgeries, if you would find that helpful. Absolutely. I'd love to hear about them
jim d
MadStamper - 25 Feb 2008 01:10 GMT > > (MadStamper) wrote > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > jim My first surgery was done in Canada on the left eye some time ago maybe back in 2002 or so. That one was performed by a opththamologist at one of the local hospitals. I had the usual n food, drink, or oral medications after midnight of the previou evening rule. I remember the day of, the anaesthesiologist spoke t me asking about previous sedatives I had used, and it's possibl based on my responses and my retinologist's advice the anaes. chos to use ativan as the general sedative for me. I know he definitel used ativan, but I'm not sure if that is just the sedative he woul have used anyways, or if I was a special case.
Once the nurse started to prep me for surgery, one of the first thing they did was put in an IV line to a bag of saline solution to hydrat me. I really don't remember too much else except that they put sheet of special paper towel over my face with a little adhesive hol to tape around the eye they operated on. No idea how they kept tha eye open, but it didn't hurt. I was pretty much stone blind in tha eye at the time so I didn't see much except the light in th operating room. After the surgery, they wheeled my gurney to little curtain cubicle to lie down for a while and drink some juice. Then they got me up and dressed, and I sat in a day-surgery recove room full of la-z-boy recliners and all the other cataract surger patients and ate a sandwich they brought. :
My second surgery was a whole other ball of wax. In addition to th potential complications I faced in the first surgery, I also had few senechia (sp??) which are points at which my iris had scarre onto my lens. My doctor explained that the cataract was encase within a very fragile sac. My iris was scarred onto that sac and i was possible the sac might have torn open as the doctor cut th senechia away. The doc then cut a small slice in the sa through which they extracted the cataract; this was another point i the procedure where the sac could have torn open. If that ha happened, the cataract would have fallen into the eye, and I woul have been referred to a retinologist to have a vitrectomy performe to remove the loose cataract within the week. This was al information my doc told me in the pre-operation consultation one wee before the surgery. During the consultation, we also discussed how t deal with other health issues (I have some unique immune issues tha needed to be addressed), and I asked when my vision would stabilis so I could get new glasses (~6 weeks) and what kinds of physica constraints I had post-operation (no lifting, no exertion, no bendin such that the head is below the waist for ten days after the surgery)
The procedure was performed by my ophthamologist (at Scott & Whit in Texas) whom I know pretty well and have seen many times. This wa at a S&W clinic and not a full-on hospital like my first surgery My husband and I waited together in the waiting room, then the nurs called for me eventually and both me and my husband went back to semi-private hospital room with a gurney, a couple of chairs, cabl TV, and a shared bathroom. I had to change into one of thos tie-shut hospital gown things and remove all jewelry and clothin from the waist up, and wear one of those elasticised paper hats t keep my hair contained. They let you keep your pants and socks o and such, they just don't want you wearing anything near where the will be operating. The nurse gave me a big plastic bag to put m things in that she would put in a locker. Then she went through al the consent paperwork with me, I was very glad my husband was wit me because I was not able to read very well, so he was able to mak sure I understood what it was I was signing before I put my signatur on the consent forms. Then the nurse quadruple-checked that I hadn' eaten or drunk anything, asked what kind of eyedrops I had put i that eye that day, and got me to put an X with a grease pencil next to the eye to be operated on.
After that, the same nurse got me set up on the gurney lying down, inserted the IV, and put three different types of super-dilating eyedrops in my right eye. She applied topical anaesthetic to the skin before inserting the IV and it was all pretty painless, but then after maybe ten minutes it really started to ache so I let her know, and she double-checked the needle and said it was most likely the topical anaesthetic wearing off. Before she gave me the dilating drops, she gave me a freezing eyedrop first (because dilating drops **sting**) and thank heavens that freezing didn't wear off before the stinging effect of the other drops went away. :)
Two members of the operating team came in to check on me, and the anaesthesiologist asked about allergies, etc. I found out from him that he was going to use a barbituate to sedate me during the surgery. I personally don't like barbituates and asked him if he would consider using ativan instead, but he said the barbituate was the only option because it sedates sufficiently for the surgery and then wears off very quickly, whereas ativan hangs around for hours and hours. I personally don't mind so much being under the effects of a gentle sedative for the hours following a minor surgery :), but I can see how the clinic would prefer not to have to deal with a bunch of patients sitting around recovering for that long.
I got wheeled into the operating room and my husband was sent off to the public waiting room. At this point I was pretty alert, and everyone introduced themselves to me (anaesthesiologist plus assistant, doctor plus two assistants). Then the barbituates were administered and they started the surgery. I was knocked absolutely out cold for about one minute (by design), tho not before I saw the hazy image of my doctor leaning over my head with a scalpel coming towards my eye. :) My doctor said he made about six incisions I think, and my eyelashes were getting stuck in one of them so he yanked out three or four at once to remove the ones that were poking into the wound. After being sedated a little while, my eyes started to roll back into my head. I wasn't aware of this, but I do remember my doctor instructing me to keep looking at my toes several times.
By the time they wheeled me out of the operating room, I was fairly conscious again, enough where my doctor was making conversation with me and getting semi-coherent responses. I was wheeled into a little curtained room and the same nurse came back and monitored my recovery from the sedative and got me something to drink. I had a hard plastic eyepatch taped over my eye that I needed to keep on until the next morning I think. They also called my husband into the room, and he helped me get dressed. I had to be wheelchaired to our car, and there was a kit of eyedrops, some medical tape, an instruction sheet, and some sunglasses in a bag for me at the check-in desk. I was adviced I could take ibuprofen to deal with the ache, but if anything like sharp pain in the eye or discharge started oozing from the eye, I was to call the doctor ASAP. I had to put four different types of drops in four times a day for one week, with ~5 minutes between each drop so they could be absorbed. There was an antibacterial, an antiinflammatory that targeted the retina, a prednisolone steroid drop to treat inflammation in the front of the eye, and I can't for the life of me remember what that fourth drop was for. Then after that I was done with the retinal antiinflammatory and for the remaining three weeks I had to put in three different eyedrops four times a day. I asked my husband to administer the drops for me for the rest of the day of my surgery because I was in such discomfort I didn't want to do it myself. I'm sure I could have in a pinch, but I didn't want to. For the rest of the day I didn't do too much. I kept the plastic patch on that whole day and that night, and wore the eyepatch every night until ten days post-op. It can be hard to remember to put the patch on, so I got in the habit of putting it on my pillow every morning so I would remember to put it on that night.
The next morning I had a follow-up appointment that my husband drove me to, and then had another followup one week post-surgery, and a final follow-up four weeks post-surgery where they tested my vision and gave me a new glasses prescription.
Now, my list of Things I Wish They Told Me Before My First Eye Surgery and This Surgery:
1. You can't shower for 24 hours after the surgery. I made sure I showered just before going for surgery. :)
2. We knew that I wouldn't be out of the clinic before 2 pm, so my husband made sure I had a good sized snack at about 11:30 the night before so I wouldn't be totally starving the next day.
3. If you are a regular coffee drinker, you will get a caffiene withdrawal headache during the fast and you will just have to live with it.
4. The appointment the following morning was casually mentioned to us on our way out -- while I had taken the rest of the week off, my husband had to make last-minute arrangements to get time off work to drive me to that appointment. So be aware you might need a driver the next morning.
5. While we had planned for the copay on the surgery, we hadn't expected the antibacterial eyedrop to cost so danged much. In the kit, we got plenty of all of the eyedrops except for the antibacterial one, for which we only received a week's supply. We had to get a refill on that eyedrop and it turns out that the best antibacterial eyedrop on the market doesn't have a generic yet, and there are no substitutions my doctor would accept, so we wound up paying a $75 copay for it instead of $5 or $10.
6. Operating rooms tend to be on the cool side, so wear warm socks.
:) They do have extra blankets in the OR, but I find nothing beats a pair of good socks.
7. You may need to talk yourself out of doing any and all lifting for the first ten days. I know I caught myself several times a day about to move something quite manageable, and I had to ask for help doing it which goes against my nature. But, it is very important to follow the doctor's directions regarding no lifting or bending.
Dan Abel - 20 Feb 2008 10:46 GMT > Hi Jim, I'm 32 and had my second cataract surgery just > last month and found your post when I was doing a search on bifocal [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > that matched the first one so I am stuck with needing +2.5 ~+2.75 > readers . It's too bad it wasn't discussed, in detail. Much of this could have to do with your optometrist, if you are in the US.
> I've been nearsighted all my life (as the inflammation and cataract in > my 'reading eye' got worse I joked that I read by smell because of how > close I had to hold things to be able to read them :) ) -- as a If you were used to having one eye for reading and the other for distance, that could have easily been done. As it is, if that is your desire, contacts might work for that.
If you want to use both eyes together, and don't want to spend a lot of time putting on reading glasses and then taking them off, there are glasses that will do this. Most people who have had cataract surgery find that bifocals don't let them see at all distances. Most of these people need at least three different corrections, distance, mid-range and reading. If you choose distance and mid-range, then I would predict that you could get by seeing the remote control and cutting the produce. Any kind of fine print would be hard, and would cause eye strain in many people if used for a long time. Some people use lined trifocals, which give all three. Some use progressives, which theoretically give an infinite number of corrections, but some people hate them.
My choice was to get my vision set for distance. I'm pretty happy with that. I have three pairs of reading glasses, and use all three. The +1.75 work for computer use and large print (a standard book). The +2.25 work for finer print, like newspapers and paperback books. The +2.75 are for tiny print, like pill bottles.
> result, since my second surgery it's been pretty frustrating to have > to run get my reading glasses to cook following a recipe, use the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > enough to it, and making the change to the opposite is a little > uncomfortable. Having cataract surgery is a compromise. Something gets lost. Most of us having cataract surgery are older, and the eyes already lost some or all of the ability to focus near and far. At your age, you may have lost a lot more.
> I definitely know what you mean about the prospect of surgery being > scary. One way of trying to minimise this for you would be to ask > your doc to walk you through the day of surgery and the following > day, what to expect the following week, etc. I can post some info > about my two surgeries, if you would find that helpful. Anything new is going to be scary, especially when it involves surgery to the eyes. We all tend to protect our eyes a lot. Still, the most dangerous part of the surgery is the drive down there. There are a million cataract surgeries done every year in the US. The doctors have it down. It's good to talk to people who've had it done, and read accounts. Still, each doctor does pre op, surgery and post op a little differently. After my first surgery, my wife and I went out to lunch together. I felt fine. I could not drive, due to the tranquilizers I had been given.
 Signature Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA dabel@sonic.net
The Real Bev - 20 Feb 2008 23:49 GMT > My choice was to get my vision set for distance. I'm pretty happy with > that. I have three pairs of reading glasses, and use all three. The > +1.75 work for computer use and large print (a standard book). The > +2.25 work for finer print, like newspapers and paperback books. The > +2.75 are for tiny print, like pill bottles. And what's neat about this is that the readers from the 99-Cents-Only store are very good and very cheap -- buy 'em by the dozen!
> Anything new is going to be scary, especially when it involves surgery > to the eyes. We all tend to protect our eyes a lot. Still, the most [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > together. I felt fine. I could not drive, due to the tranquilizers I > had been given. I once found on the web a movie of a "typical" cataract operation. It might or might not be good to watch such a thing, depending on how squamish you are.
 Signature Cheers, Bev ====================================================== Guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
Dan Abel - 21 Feb 2008 03:03 GMT > > My choice was to get my vision set for distance. I'm pretty happy with > > that. I have three pairs of reading glasses, and use all three. The [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > And what's neat about this is that the readers from the 99-Cents-Only > store are very good and very cheap -- buy 'em by the dozen! I only buy the highest quality reading glasses. I pay US$18.99 for three pairs at Costco.
 Signature Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA dabel@sonic.net
The Real Bev - 21 Feb 2008 23:52 GMT >> > My choice was to get my vision set for distance. I'm pretty happy with >> > that. I have three pairs of reading glasses, and use all three. The [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > I only buy the highest quality reading glasses. I pay US$18.99 for > three pairs at Costco. The problem with those is that you can't try them on first. I have nose-comfort issues, and I think you can only get three of the same size...
I bought some [real or fake, who cares?] Ray-Bans for 99 cents. Most of their glasses look as good as what you'd buy at the drugstore for $10-20 (or computer swap meets for $5), including the imitation Oakley M-frame sunglasses (not counterfeit, just nameless lookalikes) which I love.
 Signature Cheers, Bev ----------------------------------------------------------------- "Nothing in the universe can withstand the relentless application of brute force and ignorance." -- Frd, via Dennis (evil)
otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 19 Feb 2008 05:44 GMT Dear Jim,
Dr. Robins information is excellent. Here is a site that reviews some of these details
http://www.tecnisiol.com/
Otis
> i'm coming up to having cataract surgery in the not so distant future, > and so am reading a lot here. It's something I'll have to do eventually, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > . Jim - 19 Feb 2008 15:11 GMT > Dear Jim, > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Otis Thanks a lot.
jim d
|
|
|