For Zetsu

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 24 Jan 2008 18:22 GMT

Dear Zetsu,

Subject: Is this the Bates method -- or is a "con"?

http://www.eyeslikenew.com/

Please define what part of this sytem is Bates?

What part is "medical"?

Or is Bates completely different?

Can you "trust" their claim of "success"?

Otis

Reply to this Message

Neil Brooks - 24 Jan 2008 18:26 GMT

On Jan 24, 10:22 am, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:

> can you "trust" their claim of "success"?

HE could. YOU might.

Others shouldn't ... unless it's reproducible in controlled studies,
and the difference achieves "statistical significance."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomized_controlled_trial

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_significance

You're welcome.

Reply to this Message

otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 24 Jan 2008 18:36 GMT

As before the resident troll has come up with a stupid answer.

The question was asked of Zetsu.

On Jan 24, 1:22 pm, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:

> Dear Zetsu,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Otis

Reply to this Message

Neil Brooks - 24 Jan 2008 20:41 GMT

On Jan 24, 10:36 am, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:

> As before the resident troll has come up with a stupid answer.

I guess I didn't see what answer you gave.

> The question was asked of Zetsu.

Though you've been informed at least a hundred times, let me enlighten
you yet again: e-mail is what you use to communicate to an individual.

Newsgroups are used for posting TO everybody, and getting replied FROM
anybody.

I hope that's clear enough. Let me know if you need further
clarification.

Reply to this Message

spammer - 25 Jan 2008 00:18 GMT

On Jan 24, 1:22 pm, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:

> Dear Zetsu,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Otis

Okay, two pathetic things here.

1) the above typical nonsensical rant by Otis.

2) His fan club consists of one retard by the name of Zetsu.

Reply to this Message

Rate this thread: