Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

For Zetsu

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 24 Jan 2008 18:22 GMT
Dear Zetsu,

Subject:  Is this the Bates method -- or is a "con"?

http://www.eyeslikenew.com/

Please define what part of this sytem is Bates?

What part is "medical"?

Or is Bates completely different?

Can you "trust" their claim of "success"?

Otis
Neil Brooks - 24 Jan 2008 18:26 GMT
On Jan 24, 10:22 am, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:
> can you "trust" their claim of "success"?

HE could.  YOU might.

Others shouldn't ... unless it's reproducible in controlled studies,
and the difference achieves "statistical significance."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomized_controlled_trial

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_significance

You're welcome.
otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 24 Jan 2008 18:36 GMT
As before the resident troll has come up with a stupid answer.

The question was asked of Zetsu.

On Jan 24, 1:22 pm, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:
> Dear Zetsu,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Otis
Neil Brooks - 24 Jan 2008 20:41 GMT
On Jan 24, 10:36 am, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:

> As before the resident troll has come up with a stupid answer.

I guess I didn't see what answer you gave.

> The question was asked of Zetsu.

Though you've been informed at least a hundred times, let me enlighten
you yet again: e-mail is what you use to communicate to an individual.

Newsgroups are used for posting TO everybody, and getting replied FROM
anybody.

I hope that's clear enough.  Let me know if you need further
clarification.
spammer - 25 Jan 2008 00:18 GMT
On Jan 24, 1:22 pm, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:
> Dear Zetsu,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Otis

           Okay, two pathetic things here.

1)  the above typical nonsensical rant by Otis.

2) His fan club consists of one retard by the name of Zetsu.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.