Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

For Zetsu

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 24 Jan 2008 18:22 GMT
Dear Zetsu,

Subject:  Is this the Bates method -- or is a "con"?

http://www.eyeslikenew.com/

Please define what part of this sytem is Bates?

What part is "medical"?

Or is Bates completely different?

Can you "trust" their claim of "success"?

Otis
Neil Brooks - 24 Jan 2008 18:26 GMT
On Jan 24, 10:22 am, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:
> can you "trust" their claim of "success"?

HE could.  YOU might.

Others shouldn't ... unless it's reproducible in controlled studies,
and the difference achieves "statistical significance."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomized_controlled_trial

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_significance

You're welcome.
otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 24 Jan 2008 18:36 GMT
As before the resident troll has come up with a stupid answer.

The question was asked of Zetsu.

On Jan 24, 1:22 pm, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:
> Dear Zetsu,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Otis
Neil Brooks - 24 Jan 2008 20:41 GMT
On Jan 24, 10:36 am, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:

> As before the resident troll has come up with a stupid answer.

I guess I didn't see what answer you gave.

> The question was asked of Zetsu.

Though you've been informed at least a hundred times, let me enlighten
you yet again: e-mail is what you use to communicate to an individual.

Newsgroups are used for posting TO everybody, and getting replied FROM
anybody.

I hope that's clear enough.  Let me know if you need further
clarification.
spammer - 25 Jan 2008 00:18 GMT
On Jan 24, 1:22 pm, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:
> Dear Zetsu,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Otis

           Okay, two pathetic things here.

1)  the above typical nonsensical rant by Otis.

2) His fan club consists of one retard by the name of Zetsu.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.