> Crizal and Transitions are both name brands with good reputations. $400 for
> those premium brands isn't scalping.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> -MT
> Suppose I get the task of, say, choosing a porcelain shade matching
> the color of another object. ( done indoors )
> Will these chosen lenses interfere with my ability in choosing the
> right value, chroma, and hue? ( color )
If you're comparing side-by-side, IMO no. It's pretty difficult to imagine a
problem with gray photochromic in its lightest state. Neutral-density
filters are widely used in photography without disturbing color balance.
Brown is another story but you don't say which Transitions you chose. No
matter, in the lightest state even brown wouldn't prevent you from matching
hues in side-by-side comparisons.
> Will they ever be a problem when the lenses loose their photochromic
> ability in the future?
The gray Transitions don't discolor with time, that I noticed.
> your feedback is different from what Mark A had written.
> Did you both personally try transitions?
There are other topics Mark and I don't agree on, but I didn't say anything
outright contradictory. The incidence of "color distortion" complaints is
very small, with Crizal or Transitions.
I wore Transitions once. They lightened to about 90% transmittance, or
better. They didn't get dark enough in sun, so separate sunglasses always
make more sense for me.
-MT