Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Optical device ID

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
R.H. - 26 Oct 2007 18:10 GMT
I'm trying to identify an optical device, if you have a minute please take a
look at the photos here:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v80/harnett65/album%207/_optic2.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v80/harnett65/album%207/_optic3.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v80/harnett65/album%207/_optic4.jpg

Please let me know if you recognize it.

Thanks,
Rob
Mike Tyner - 26 Oct 2007 23:44 GMT
> I'm trying to identify an optical device, if you have a minute please take
> a
> look at the photos here:

That's pretty fascinating. I've seen a lot of antiques but nothing like
this.

What happens when you move the lever around that scale marked -8 to +10? It
just rotates the lens bar?

The brass tools in the front left corner of the case have a concave face. Is
that pink putty, like hardened mud? Do those tools fit onto the dialing
device?

The frosted glass trial lens would be a projection surface, if it's
original.

The extra arm looks like it might have held a light source, maybe sodium
lamp.

From the design and finishes, it could be as old as 1900 or as new as 1940.

There's no company name embossed on the case?

Neither of the purple velvet inserts pop out, do they?

-MT,OD

> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v80/harnett65/album%207/_optic2.jpg
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks,
> Rob
R.H. - 27 Oct 2007 13:59 GMT
>> I'm trying to identify an optical device, if you have a minute please
>> take a
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> -MT,OD

>> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v80/harnett65/album%207/_optic2.jpg
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> Thanks,
>> Rob

Thanks for your help, I sent your questions to the owner of this device and
here is his reply:

"If you look through the lens and rotate the arm nothing appears to change.
The brass disks have pink paint in the concave and what appear to be the
eyes blood vessels leading to a raised pimple which would be the optic nerve
(what it looks to me anyway) and is blank on the other side painted black,
the piece fits snugly into the back? of the dialing device . The frosted
glass lens appears to be original and the extra arm is slotted which may
hold a card ?? . There are also 2 black slides with 3 openings, both slides
have 2 empty openings and one opening with glass which doesn't appear to be
ground at all. The velvet bottom in the the case lifted out but revealed
nothing ( treasure map would have been nice) and there is no markings at all
on the case or bottom of the brass stand and I wasn't game to force the
lining from inside the lid."

He also sent some new photos:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v80/harnett65/album%207/_optic6.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v80/harnett65/album%207/_optic8.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v80/harnett65/album%207/_optic9.jpg

Rob
Mike Tyner - 27 Oct 2007 14:43 GMT
> "If you look through the lens and rotate the arm nothing appears to
> change. The brass disks have pink paint in the concave and what appear to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> and there is no markings at all on the case or bottom of the brass stand
> and I wasn't game to force the lining from inside the lid."

I'm sure the painted retinal images are crucial but I don't see how it could
work as a device for practicing ophthalmoscopy or calibrating some sort of
ophthalmoscope. It appears the concave retinal images are inserted into the
dialing device face-IN, which makes no sense because there's no light path
through the dialing device.

I'm curious enough that I'd like to post the photos to an optometry list, if
you're willing.

-MT
R.H. - 27 Oct 2007 15:24 GMT
>> "If you look through the lens and rotate the arm nothing appears to
>> change. The brass disks have pink paint in the concave and what appear to
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> I'm curious enough that I'd like to post the photos to an optometry list,
> if you're willing.

Yes, feel free to post them there if you want.

Rob
Mike Tyner - 28 Oct 2007 23:04 GMT
> Yes, feel free to post them there if you want.

Not much luck, I'm afraid.

I've heard two suggestions back from the list.

One suggestion was it's a "Badal optometer" but that isn't possible because
those work like a viewmaster or stereopticon - clear path from lens to
target, and not much else.

Another suggestion was - it's a towel rack.

Best I can figure it's a device for practicing ophthalmoscopy.

-MT, OD
R.H. - 29 Oct 2007 00:51 GMT
>> Yes, feel free to post them there if you want.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> -MT, OD

Thanks for checking, if I ever find any info on it, I'll post it here.

Rob
Jan - 01 Nov 2007 00:25 GMT
Mike Tyner schreef:

> Best I can figure it's a device for practicing ophthalmoscopy.
>
> -MT, OD

I also was thinking about a practicing device and besides meant for
ophthalmoscopy  I was thinking it is used to practice in  skiascopy (in
the USA called retinascopy?)
Both spherical and cylindrical.

Because there is no TABO scheme for the axis on the device I might
suggest this instrument must be old, I think +/- 1900.

Besides a towel you might think of an oil or carbid lamp placed on the hook.
I think you can place the hook just out of the axis or beside the
artificial eye so the practicioner can use the mirror on his head to
observe.

I have some antique instruments without an internal light with which you
can practice skiascopy (retinoscopy) and ophthalmoscopy as well by just
changing a mirror.

Greetings,

Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
R.H. - 05 Nov 2007 00:15 GMT
> Mike Tyner schreef:
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Jan (normally Dutch spoken)

Thanks, this is the answer that I posted on the answer page of my web site:

http://pzphotosans204-wt.blogspot.com/

Rob
Neil Brooks - 05 Nov 2007 18:10 GMT
> Thanks, this is the answer that I posted on the answer page of my web site:
>
> http://pzphotosans204-wt.blogspot.com/

I feel compelled to add that 1131 and 1132 were probably NOT used WITH
1130.

Probably not.

;-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.