Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Dr. Harris defines the need for prevention.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
otisbrown@pa.net - 06 Oct 2007 04:45 GMT
Harris.txt

Dear Second-opinion friends,

Subject:  Paul Harris spells this preventive second-opinion
on Robert Hohendorf's web site

>From Dr.  Hohendorf's web site...

http://www.vscenter.com/mstaff.html#ContactUs

A FAQ prepared by Paul Harris:

http://www.vscenter.com/faq.html#7

    DrHarris> During the course of treatment the role of the
lenses often changes.  Whereas at first they helped to maintain a
good working distance and helped the child concentrate better,
later on they take on more of a role in the prevention of the
development of nearsightedness.  You may have noticed that more of
your excellent students are nearsighted and wear glasses or
contact lenses to see clearly at distance.  There are links
between doing large amounts of sustained close work in people who
are goal-oriented and detail-oriented and the development of
nearsightedness or myopia.  You may have also noticed fewer of
those children with learning problems wearing glasses.    Once the
vision therapy has helped the child acquire the visual abilities
necessary to learn and once they begin applying themselves in
school they become at-risk to development of nearsightedness.  The
stress-relieving lenses help to prevent this.

    Keep an open mind about plus-prevention, and second-opinion
doctors.  Learn from them.

    Your children could avoid ENTRY into myopia -- if you support
them.

Best,

Otis
serebel - 06 Oct 2007 05:01 GMT
A web site. It must be true if there's a website out there.
Neil Brooks - 06 Oct 2007 06:41 GMT
On Oct 5, 8:45 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:

>      Your children could avoid ENTRY into myopia -- if you support
> them.

Your niece, Joyce V. Benson, couldn't.  She's a -1.00d (or so) myope
now.

Why didn't you support her?

Oh, wait.  You did.  It simply doesn't seem to have worked, now does
it.

Hmmm...
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 07 Oct 2007 05:58 GMT
> On Oct 5, 8:45 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Hmmm...

we don't discuss failures!  it worked for Keith.  perhaps it works 50%
of the time.  perhaps random chance would give a 50% success rate
too!  how would Otis know since he never did any studies-- he just
flaps his mouth over and over again.

Oh wait-- I hear another rousing rendition of "The Printer's Son" by
Raphaelson coming on.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.