Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

FYI:  Invitation to Trolling

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ms.Brainy - 20 Sep 2007 21:15 GMT
To: PerfectSight@yahoogroups.com
From:  "Hatake Kakashi" <kyazekage@yahoo.co.uk>  Add to Address Book
Add Mobile Alert
Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by
yahoogroups.com. Learn more
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:39:36 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [PerfectSight] sci.med.vision -- would you help me argue with
them?
   Hello G.Gatti,

I have recognized that you are a skillful debater and dedicated
proponent of the rest methods in the cure of imperfect sight by
treatment without glasses.

Would you like to join me, in the arguments with sci.med.vision?

They are very dumb but I think we will make a powerful force and
perhaps we will be able to inject a small amount of intelligence into
their very misguided and ignorant minds.

If you would like to join in the argument, please then come back to
sci.med.vision, if you do have the time.

They are very stupid and believe that sun treatment causes permanent
damage. I am arguing that it does not.

http://groups. google.com/ group/sci. med.vision/ browse_thread/
thread/425291b61 98e5b2c/0e4d77ea 0db4e23a? q=neil+brooks+ recommends&
lnk=ol&

I am the one named 'Zetsu', my friend is called Jason.

Come on join, if you please.

Best to you.

____________
Zetsu - 20 Sep 2007 21:19 GMT
Hello MsBrainy,

I am surprised you are a member of the PerfectSight group.
I thought you disapproved of such 'alternative places'.
Well then, you should read the archives. You will learn very much!
Zetsu - 20 Sep 2007 21:21 GMT
It is not an 'invitation to trolling'.

Rishi is a good debator and I think he would be able to show the
people here lots. So I have asked him if he wants to come. But you
should not call it 'trolling'.
Ms.Brainy - 21 Sep 2007 01:23 GMT
Rishi's Reply:

To: PerfectSight@yahoogroups.com
From:  "Rishi Giovanni Gatti" <rishiggatti@yahoo.it>  Add to Address
Book  Add Mobile Alert
Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by
yahoogroups.com. Learn more
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:13:47 -0000
Subject: [PerfectSight] Re: sci.med.vision -- would you help me argue
with them?

> Would you like to join me, in the arguments with sci.med.vision?

Dear friend,

We have been many years ago on sci.med.vision, when we where less
skillful and more enraged because of the damage those people do with
the
eyes of people.

I was not alne in debating with them, there were also other people,
which later have been revealed to be charlatans themselves. Some of
them
were also here but then I needed to f.ck them away and restart from
scratch as you may see in the archives.

I cannot join with you in the battle because for me now there is no
time
for such a thing, which may be good for youngsters, I think.

Those people have a very big problem before them: they are RIGHT, from
their own standpoint.

To have them recognize their error, thy must first change the very
basis
of their work, and since this is what feeds them, it is stupid to try
to
convince them to quit their income!

> They are very stupid and believe that sun treatment causes permanent
damage. I am arguing that it does not.

They are right. The sun injures the retina if you are wthout perfect
sight staring at it.
They have proofs for that, they show you their scans, so you cannot
convince them.

The only way to show them they are wrong, is to work with a patient of
them who has the hole in the retina and have it practice the Bates
Original System.

Now this is quite very difficult!

Where is such a man, with damaged retina, frightened, blinded in his
trust and following the wrong doctors as a faith, who wants to detach
from them and follow the only method that works?

Most of all, if you want to fight really with them to the very last,
you
need to have perfect sight in all conditions, and you must be able to
endure the tests they do with their machine which are very much
straining.

Are you cured in such a complete and invincible way?

If you are, I believe you won't be anymore interested with
sci.med.vision.

The very truth about perfect sight is that once you attain it, it
becomes such a trivial thing that you lose interest into it and start
living your life as a normal huamn being as it should be.

Doctor MacCracken has stated this saying that in children the
achievement of the cure of their imperfect sight is the minimum, the
least of all of what they will achieve in life!!

The cure of imerfect sight is not difficult.

The patient should start with one very clear statement in his mind,
that is: he understands that he has to re-train himself to use his own
eyes without strain.

This cannot be difficult because it is the natural thing to do, you do
not need to be re-educated or educated to perfect sight.

What you need to do to your self is to train yourself to be AWAY FROM
STRAIN TO SEE.

You have to train yourself NOT into improving your eyesight, but just
in becoming accustomed to stop the stare all the time.

In the beginning, once you are able to stop the stare for a few
seconds at leaast, you may see that the eyes and mind start to
function in the normal way.

When I say "start" I mean that in most cases at the beginning YOU NEED
TIME, you need time for the stare once it has been stopped to remain
stopped and have the eye and mind recalibrate and let themselves do
the right job.

This may take minutes at a time before the eyesight becomes less
blurred and the stare less, that means, really gone away continuously.

Most people stop to stop the stare too early and vision has no
possibility to become good again.

Then you have the clear flashes that happen by themselves but we are
not interested in clear flashes because we are interested in
methodology and practice.

The clear flashes must be discarded quickly.

Whenever you have a clear flash, let it go away, start to do thing to
have it desappear, star the stare, destry the good vsion, because it
was not obtained because of your practice but despite your wrong
behaviour.

This is tricky as an arguent, I know, but is the truth.

It must become a very hard work to have you succeed in destroying the
clear flash.

So you must work along two opposite lines of treatment.

1) stop the stare all the time.
2) once the clear flash comes, try the hardest to destroy it.
1.bis) once you have succeeded in destroying the clear flash, this
means you have been successful with the stare, so you start again to
destroy the stare with methods that work.
2.bis) it will be more and more difficult to stop it unless you will
forget all about it and you then are cured.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.