Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / August 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Never get Ophthalmological treatment in India!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 15 Aug 2007 14:28 GMT
What kind of w.nkers would post internet newsgroup spam in order to
promote their medical treatment abilities?  Somebody who isn't very
professional and has poor judgment-- that's who!

I recommend that NO ONE consider visiting India for any treatment.
Except maybe Otis.
Glenn - USAEyes.org - 15 Aug 2007 16:26 GMT
>I recommend that NO ONE consider visiting India for any treatment.

That seems to be painting an entire country's medical proficiency with
a rather broad brush. There are many excellent medical facilities and
providers throughout South Asia. No need to condemn them all because
of one's less than tasteful use of a newsgroup.

Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes (TM)
Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification

"Consider and Choose With Confidence" (TM)

Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org

http://www.USAEyes.org

Lasik Bulletin Board
http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/

I am not a doctor.

Copyright 2007
All Rights Reserved
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 15 Aug 2007 23:56 GMT
On Aug 15, 11:26 am, Glenn - USAEyes.org
<glenn.hageleSTOPS...@USAEyes.org> wrote:
> >I recommend that NO ONE consider visiting India for any treatment.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Copyright 2007
> All Rights Reserved

i never said anything about Southeast Asia.  I said India.  The
country where the facilities these spammers are advertising are
located.  If  they were smart perhaps they would realize that posting
such spam annoys people rather than promotes a positive image of their
medical prowess.  So I guess I don't really know what you mean.  Do
you complain that I lump all Indian medical facilites together in a
negative light?  Really-- I think you understand what I mean and I
would even guess that on many levels you agree with me that stopping
such spam would be beneficial by holding the originators accountable.
or maybe you wouldn't in which case I don't have a clue what your
problem is.
RT - 16 Aug 2007 01:08 GMT
> i never said anything about Southeast Asia.

Nor has anyone else. India is a country in South Asia as was stated. It
may be spam to advertise repeatedly on this NG, but you're still racist
bigot when you condemn every doctor in a particular country.

Signature

~RT

spammer - 16 Aug 2007 01:34 GMT
> In article <1187218583.845666.278...@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> --
> ~RT

Can't be a racist and bigoted statement. Not all docs in India are
Indian. Can't be bigoted either, lots of religions are represented in
India.

Doctor is a profession not a race or religion, so he would be a
"doctorist", not a racist.
RT - 16 Aug 2007 02:13 GMT
> Can't be a racist and bigoted statement. Not all docs in India are
> Indian. Can't be bigoted either, lots of religions are represented in
> India.

Okay, maybe not racist but certainly a bigot. Bigotry is not limited to
religion, although many doctors believe they are God :)

> Doctor is a profession not a race or religion, so he would be a
> "doctorist", not a racist.

True, there is a lot of doctorism on this NG :)
But pclarkii did clearly state not to go to doctors in India. He's a
locationist then.

Signature

~RT

otisbrown@pa.net - 16 Aug 2007 02:51 GMT
RT>  Okay, maybe not racist but certainly a bigot. Bigotry is not
limited to
religion, although many doctors believe they are God :)

Otis>  Although in MR. PClark's case far more than
"believe", he is convinced he IS a God.

Otis> Funny, in most contrys, MR. PClark is not allowed
to us a title indicating MEDICAL ability.  He is called
Mr. and all he can do is to REFRACT the eye.

Otis>  True medical issues are restricted to MEDICAL
people, as per the MEDICAL DOCTORS in India
and in other countries.

Otis>  But Gods don't have to consider their own
limitations.

Just one man's opinion.

Otis

> In article <1187224474.413252.209...@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> --
> ~RT
Neil Brooks - 16 Aug 2007 04:15 GMT
>Otis>  Although in MR. PClark's case far more than
>"believe", he is convinced he IS a God.

You're an idiot, Otis.

>Otis> Funny, in most contrys, MR. PClark is not allowed
>to us a title indicating MEDICAL ability.  He is called
>Mr. and all he can do is to REFRACT the eye.

In this country, you're an idiot, Otis.

>Otis>  True medical issues are restricted to MEDICAL
>people, as per the MEDICAL DOCTORS in India
>and in other countries.
>
>Otis>  But Gods don't have to consider their own
>limitations.

You're an idiot, Otis.

>Just one man's opinion.

One idiot's opinion, that is.
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 16 Aug 2007 12:09 GMT
> But pclarkii did clearly state not to go to doctors in India. He's a
> locationist then.
>
> --
> ~RT

yeah.  i say don't go to anyone who uses spam as a way to advertise
their business.  if that makes me a bigot in your definition then so
be it you dweeb.  i guess you appreciate the finer points of being
spammed.   idiot!
RT - 16 Aug 2007 19:29 GMT
> > But pclarkii did clearly state not to go to doctors in India. He's a
> > locationist then.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> their business.  if that makes me a bigot in your definition then so
> be it you dweeb.  

I agree with your statement above about not patronizing spammers, but
that's not what you wrote and that's not what I was responding to. You
said "I recommend that NO ONE consider visiting India for any
treatment." Can you see the difference? If it was an American practice
that posted 3 times in a row, would you caution everyone from visiting
the US for treatment? England, France, Russia, Brazil, Japan, China,
Pakistan, Jordan, South Africa, Morocco, Norway--where do you draw the
line? Your statement came across as condemning India because that poster
was from India and you have something against India. Want to throw some
other locations in there or is it just India; and why?

> i guess you appreciate the finer points of being
> spammed.   idiot!

Actually, I think I missed those finer points because I didn't read the
posts, I simply kill filed them. As soon as I noticed they were
advertisements, I deleted them. You and "Brainy" (now that's funny)
don't seem to see that I'm not defending spam on this NG, I just get
appalled when I see statements like "I recommend that NO ONE consider
visiting India for any treatment." It's absurd and offensive to the
thousands of doctors in India who care for millions and contribute to
the international scientific community with medical studies and
research.

I don't necessarily recommend traveling to another country or even
across your own country for treatments that you can get closer to home
simply because you are then too far away from the doctor should
complications arise. In fact, many doctors in India received their
training in top US and Europe (and other Western and other) med schools
and have the same skills and work at top rate facilities there. There
are times I would recommend travel to India. For example, someone in the
remote regions of a neighboring country needs a corneal transplant. The
closest experts might be in India and traveling to India might be the
difference between keeping or losing eye sight.

If you are referring to "medical tourism" that is another matter
altogether and is really about economics. Then again, unless you have a
participating doctor/partner in your home country for followups, you are
at risk for being stranded if complications arise and there have been
some real horror stories I've read about of botched operations. But
those are mostly for elective surgeries, especially cosmetic.

I think you forget that there are people who read this NG and indeed
people in general from all over the world, not just from the US, Europe,
Australia or wherever you are. I read this NG when I'm traveling through
and living in Asia. There might be circumstances when my best best would
be to travel to India to receive treatment.

BTW, I haven't heard anyone called a "dweeb" since I was in 5th grade,
which was a very long time ago. It made me laugh. Good comeback. "idiot"
was not so inspired.

Signature

~RT

p.clarkii@gmail.com - 17 Aug 2007 01:14 GMT
> In article <1187262569.614098.155...@a39g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>
>  p.clar...@gmail.com wrote:>
> If it was an American practice
> that posted 3 times in a row, would you caution everyone from visiting
> the US for treatment?

most definitely.  boycott ALL spammers!

and I'm not sure that recommending anyone to come to the US so they
can be overcharged would be too helpful anyway since there is good
healthcare in a lot of countries.

> > i guess you appreciate the finer points of being
> > spammed.   idiot!
>
> Actually, I think I missed those finer points because I didn't read the
> posts, I simply kill filed them.

good for you.
Glenn - USAEyes.org - 16 Aug 2007 02:08 GMT
South Asia (not Southeast Asia) is a common term for the area that
encompasses India.

Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes (TM)
Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification

"Consider and Choose With Confidence" (TM)

Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org

http://www.USAEyes.org

Lasik Bulletin Board
http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/

I am not a doctor.

Copyright 2007
All Rights Reserved
Ms.Brainy - 16 Aug 2007 04:44 GMT
On Aug 15, 6:08 pm, Glenn - USAEyes.org
<glenn.hageleSTOPS...@USAEyes.org> wrote:
> South Asia (not Southeast Asia) is a common term for the area that
> encompasses India.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Copyright 2007
> All Rights Reserved

To all those who rushed to defend the spammer from India and accuse
PClar of crimes against humanity:  Have you lost any touch with
reality?  Lighten up!

The spammer posted under "VisionCareIndia", purporting to represent
the vision care system of the entire Indian subcontinent.  PClar had a
spontaneous response, nothing more and nothing else.  I can assure you
that he did not suggest the entire population of India should be
blamed, or that there is no decent physician in India who does an
honest job of eye care and is not engaged in spamming.

As to Hitler, he didn't do it alone.  There were the masses of
supporters and enablers who made that last century insanity
possible.

Apparently now we have here a wave of spam supporters, attacking the
one who stood up to denounce it.  Shame on you!
Kakuzu - 16 Aug 2007 08:03 GMT
>To all those who rushed to defend the spammer

Stupid woman. No one was defending the spammer, only your idiotic mind
perceived it as so.

>accuse PClar of crimes against humanity:

As if PClar doesn't do it himself, on a constant basis with Otis?
Filth like him deserve to be condemned, for every last stupid word
they utter. Give them a taste of their own medicine, it will!

> I can assure you that he did not suggest the
>entire population of India should be blamed

He as good as, did!

>Apparently now we have here a wave of spam supporters

Stupid woman. Only in your foolish mind.

>attacking the one who stood up to denounce it.

No, just attacking the whiners who stood up to see their flag waving.

>Shame on you!

Shame on you, Brainy! Go suck up to your boyfriend PClar somewhere
else. I know how much he enjoys it.
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 16 Aug 2007 12:12 GMT
> As if PClar doesn't do it himself, on a constant basis with Otis?
> Filth like him deserve to be condemned, for every last stupid word
> they utter.

better go to bed Revival.  i hear mummy calling.  daddy will be mad.
Kakuzu - 16 Aug 2007 15:14 GMT
>i say don't go to anyone who uses spam as a way to advertise

Such pathetic lies... This is what you said in your first post:

>I recommend that NO ONE consider visiting India for any treatment.

It wasn't that long ago, and you have already forgotten?

You dimwit moronic idiot.
Kakuzu - 16 Aug 2007 15:18 GMT
>i hear mummy calling.  daddy will be mad.

Speaking of mummies and daddies... Didn't yours ever tell you not to
lie?

>i guess you appreciate the finer points of being spammed.   idiot!

Spam or no spam, it is irrelavant. Your first remark was filth either
way.

Deny all you like, you pathetic old dweeb.
But you remain the idiot you always were.
Churie. - 16 Aug 2007 08:05 GMT
> On Aug 15, 6:08 pm, Glenn - USAEyes.org
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Hi
There are much better institutes than this and they never involve in
such activities.Lot of patient awarness programmes are done in the
rural areas free of cost.Request Vision Care to provide a detailed
programmes that they have done on Behalf on National Blind Control
Society Of India with documental evidences.I'll do more postings on
this.
DAK - 17 Aug 2007 01:09 GMT
> > On Aug 15, 6:08 pm, Glenn - USAEyes.org
>
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Hello Gang:

Be very careful of Glenn Hagele and his advice...Here are some
references that you may want to read on Hagele:

http://lasikflap.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=21

(if you doubt any of this to be true, or in the opinions of many hurt
lasik patients that Hagele has tried to blackmail, then please contact
any of the hurt lasik patients because most of them have websites
warning you of Glenn Hagele)

Be very, very careful as some of the people on line who are giving you
advice certainly are not doctors and should not be.  Some of these
same people, are getting kick backs or commissions from lying lasik
doctors to funnel patients their way.  I have an investigation with
several US departments that are checking into this and posing as hurt
patients to verify the fraud attempts.  Again, be very careful...these
are YOUR eyes and you can NOT afford one mistake!

Why do I care?  Very simply put, I now understand how corrupt lying
lasik doctors can be first hand.  Many/most will lie to you in order
to take your money and believe it or not, once you sign the Informed
Consent form, these lying lasik doctors KNOW that you won't win in a
courtroom even if you were hurt by their negligence...That is just the
tip of the iceburg and I'll leave it at that!

I operate a website called:  www.LifeAfterLasik.com and I hear all of
the complaints about Lasik.  If I may put my two cents worth in here.
I would say to first and foremost, DO NOT ELECT LASIK SURGERY, because
GREED is at the front and PATIENT's SAFETY AND WELL BEING is at the
back.  Truly I am educated on this subject since I have had about 500
conversations with suicidal post lasik patients and I heard the
numbers were more like 10,000 hurt lasik patients in the USA alone and
growing.  But neither here nor there, the best treatment in my opinion
after speaking with doctors, educated phd's, scientists, attorneys is
to NOT have treatment within the USA as they make you sign a INFORMED
CONSENT FORM, which is really there to protect the lying lasik doctors
from YOU suing them.  I would recommend that you go to either
Germany,Norway or Italy as they are 3 years ahead of the USA, they
don't tend to lie to get your money and tend to give you a more biased
honest opinion.  I had to fly out of the country to Tromso, Norway
twice this year to get a surface PRK treatment because the technology
wasn't even safe for doing TOPO guided PRK to fix what the USA
lying lasik doctors are messing up.

Anyway, please do your du-dilligence, and TRUST NO ONE especially the
USA doctors!  They tend to lie, charge you top dollar, and by the time
the Statute of Limitations runs out, you can't sue them for the
irreversible damages incurred.  Trust me, I know how corrupt it is
here in the USA...

Please reference chat rooms that are full of unhappy lasik patients
that once had great lives, great stories,
and now the common word is "suidical", see for yourself:

www.LasikFlap.com

www.LifeAfterLasik.com

www.LasikFraud.com

www.YouTube.com  Search:  Glenn Hagele, CRSQA, Lasik FDA,
And you will discover the documentaries that were aired showing that
the lasik industry has "skewed" success rates actually LYING to the
public about how many patients reported being "happy."  This is shown
here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqomPX4ADvE

Or read about the idiot that ruined my eyesight and has 60+ lawsuits
and is now being sued by our family here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rhq68dCvj1k

Good luck!  I ask you for not one penny, no money, just that you
understand one thing:

Know this:  "You only have one set of eyes.  PERIOD.  Why let anyone
take a razor blade and slash through your perfectly clear optics that
can tolerate glasses or contacts?  Did you know after Lasik, most of
us can't even tolerate glasses or contacts and have to be on
prescription strength eye drops for the rest of our lives at the tune
of $150/month?"

"Most lasik surgeries are a failure 1,3,5,8 years later."  Do you know
why?  Answer:  Your eyes change, gravity changes your eyes, and worse
yet, the flap created by their blades are lifelong and never fully
heal.  Most of you will have a medical condition called Dry Eye
Syndrome which there is NO KNOWN CURE for.  The lying lasik doctors
aren't really enforcing this or "telling the entire story nor are they
properly educating their patients" about ALL of the indepth problems
associated with lasik such as Suicide and Blindness.

And the reason is simple, they are making "millions."  Their families
are benefiting off of your families suffering ongoing and the industry
could care less.  The news channels could care less.  It's all a mafia
style gravy train to be blunt.
Glenn - USAEyes.org - 17 Aug 2007 05:09 GMT
I've become a person at which a handful of people who had a bad Lasik
outcome have decided to direct their ire. Their attacks include lying
about my financial history, insulting my wife, publishing my personal
identity including Social Security number, bank account numbers,
credit card numbers on their bulletin boards, defamation, trademark
infringement, listing doctors we have not certified as recommended,
harassing those who fund and govern our nonprofit organization, and
often doing this while hiding behind false identities and multiple
aliases.

Considering the work I do to advocate for Lasik patients and the
nonprofit patient advocacy I founded, their acts seem to have no logic
or reason. Even stranger is the fact that these people did not seek
our information before surgery and did not use doctors certified by
our organization, but you can't use logic and reason on illogical and
unreasonable people.

The outrageous accusations, manipulations, half-truths, outright lies,
false complaints, and attacks on me and others by these anti-Lasik
zealots have caused them some serious trouble.

One recently had the FBI show up at his door investigating an alleged
extortion attempt against his former surgeon and had previously been
charged with felony use of false identity and resisting arrest.
Another has the Attorney General investigating her for publicizing my
personal identity including Social Security number on her website. Her
employer is investigating how her access to federal secure computer
systems was used to publish defamation on the Internet, and she uses
so many aliases it is hard to keep up. Another has a permanent
restraining order against him for threatening Dallas Lasik doctor
William Boothe, MD with physical violence, has been sued for
defamation, lost, found in contempt of court and sentenced to jail
(fled state), is in bankruptcy, cyber-pirated our organization's
trademark domain, plus I'm personally suing him for defamation and
invasion of privacy in California Superior Court.

Rather than copy and pasting the details again and again, just Google:

Brent Hanson
http://tinyurl.com/yrjayg

Lauranell "Nell" Burch
http://tinyurl.com/2y74l7

Dean Andrew Kantis
http://tinyurl.com/2zf3qa

Or you can stop by my personal website:
http://www.GlennHagele.com

For those who would like to form their own opinion about the work I do
and the organization I founded, visit our website and/or our Lasik
Patient Forum listed below my signature.

Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes (TM)
Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification

"Consider and Choose With Confidence" (TM)

Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org

http://www.USAEyes.org

Lasik Bulletin Board
http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/

I am not a doctor.

Copyright 2007
All Rights Reserved
Kakuzu - 16 Aug 2007 08:16 GMT
>The spammer posted under "VisionCareIndia", purporting to represent
>the vision care system of the entire Indian subcontinent.

What new level of stupidity have you reached, Brainy? Just because the
name is "VisionCareIndia" does not follow the conclusion that it is
purporting to represent the vision care system of the entire
subcontinent. You have never heard ofa typical company name such as
'MedicareUK' or 'TrainExpressAmerica'? Do you even hear anything at
all, Brainy? With this new level of stupidity I now witness, I would
very much doubt you do!
Kakuzu - 15 Aug 2007 19:00 GMT
>What kind of w.nkers would post internet newsgroup spam

Better to ask: What kind of fool can't use a kill file?

>I recommend that NO ONE consider visiting India for any treatment.

You idiotic moron! What kind of a stupid filthy crap remark is this?

And we should all avoid visiting Germany because Hitler ruled?
Kakuzu - 15 Aug 2007 19:05 GMT
>What kind of w.nkers would post internet newsgroup spam

Better to ask: What kind of moronic fool can't use a kill file?

>Somebody who isn't very professional
>and has poor judgment-- that's who!

Wow! How long did it take you to work this one out?

>I recommend that NO ONE consider visiting India for any treatment.

You idiotic scum! What kind of a stupid filthy crap remark is this?

And we should all avoid visiting Germany because Hitler ruled?
Ms.Brainy - 15 Aug 2007 19:41 GMT
> >What kind of w.nkers would post internet newsgroup spam
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> And we should all avoid visiting Germany because Hitler ruled?

Dear Troll Kakuzu-Quasimodo,

When a new person finds this NG and sees the entire first page of
messages consisting on spam and commercials only, s/he would think (as
would I and probably you) that this is another Internet group that was
taken over by the spammers.  They would then skip this usenet group
and continue the search for an uncontaminated group.

Moreover, a barrage of such posts kills any outstanding discussion by
pushing it to the back.  Only seldom those older posts are visited
once they are pushed to older pages.

This has happened to you as well.  You (or your little brother?) was
told by your parents to "go to bed" so you couldn't respond to my
post, but you promised to write "tomorrow".  This promise was killed
by the spammers and your a.s was saved.  Or maybe it wasn't you but
rather Hoshigaki (it was his style and personality), confusingly using
your identity?  You should get your act together, Troll!
Zetsu - 15 Aug 2007 20:50 GMT
Hello,

Ms.Brainy, you are directing this post to me? Your first paragraph
displays the foolishness which I would hope to illustrate before we
must all contend with a new outbreak of stupidity which in these
situations so inevitably arises, which also shares remarkable
similarities to the case of the 'Neil Brooks vs Otis battle'.

You will not destroy this spam poster by your petty whining. It is an
advertiser, who cares little for the newsgroup it must insinuate
itself into and pollute for gain of wealth! Do not attempt to vanquish
it with a fresh parade of moaning, as Neil Brooks continually attempts
to do in the case of Otis. It is futile! If you truly wish for its
banishment, then you should confront the member with use of a formal
complaint. The fact is that there is no other way, and to post your
futile exhibits of aggravated rants is self defeating in its purpose,
lending the spammer a higher level of attention; and attracting
further potential customers. Ever studied Economics? If you had, you
would have the commonsense knowledge that this is a typical market
strategy! Although, common sense is clearly lacking with a number of
participants in here.

>Moreover, a barrage of such posts kills any outstanding discussion by
>pushing it to the back.  Only seldom those older posts are visited
>once they are pushed to older pages.

Yes, but the newsgroups have been designed in this way with good
reason. Older posts are pushed to the back so that the new horde of
threads may prosper. It aids fast progression of the discussion. It is
an advantage, not a disadvantage. If it is felt by the participants
that any of the buried or hidden threads may still carry any
discussion value, then by posting in that thread, it will ensure its
display under the 'active older topics' heading, which is a small
column to the far right in the page. It is a brilliant and intelligent
system for increased productivity of conversation, surely?

>This has happened to you as well.  You (or your little brother?) was
>told by your parents to "go to bed" so you couldn't respond to my
>post, but you promised to write "tomorrow".

It was me. I note that you write 'go to bed' in quotations, as though
to mark your disbelief. Perhaps it seems odd to you, but recall that
you are living in America and the timezone is different. Therefore
night approaches here before night approaches your own country. And
thus bedtime for me is earlier also, than your own.

My promise was held on the account that you would simplify your post
such as to allow me to decipher the basis of each point you are making
against me. You have not done this, therefore my promise does not take
effect.

>You should get your act together, Troll!

I do not understand what is meant by that!
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 15 Aug 2007 23:57 GMT
> >What kind of w.nkers would post internet newsgroup spam
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> And we should all avoid visiting Germany because Hitler ruled?

Revival-- you are an idiot.  how about you go away along with all the
spammers as well.
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 16 Aug 2007 12:16 GMT
On Aug 15, 9:28 am, p.clar...@gmail.com wrote:

> Except maybe Otis.

did this honk you off Otis?  you pathetic simpleton.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.