 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Vision / August 2007Good Advice!
Sometimes Otis gives a very good advice. Recently he responded to the following on his MyopiaFree yahoo group: >> I am very upset about my friend, who >> Still thinks that he had good doctor. > Otis> Then do not argue with him. This is his issue, not your issue. Until he chooses to do something about it -- your taking will only "harden" him in his conviction that the plus is wonderful and PERFECT FOR HIM. > My suggestion? > Just let it go. > Otis Dear Otis, will you please follow your own advice? Just let it go! Dear Brainy, Subject: You are correct! Yes, most people have no interest in keeping or protecting their distant vision. That is fine with me. But they should receive information on the threshold -- which then can understand, and act upon -- or ignore. But once they choose to ignore the scientific information concerning plus-prevention -- then they should never complain about the consequences at a later date. In any event, as I suggested previously, anyone who wishes a second-opinion evaluation of these issues, should go to Alex Eulenberg site. Enjoy, Otis > Sometimes Otis gives a very good advice. Recently he responded to the > following on his MyopiaFree yahoo group: [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Dear Otis, will you please follow your own advice? Just let it go! > Yes, most people have no interest in keeping or > protecting their distant vision. That is fine with me. That statement is false. That's fine with you too. It should read "most people have no interest in placebo treatment." > But they should receive information on the threshold -- which > then can understand, and act upon -- or ignore. So you recommend early FDA approval for pirenzipine? No other "prevention" has been proven to work. > But once they choose to ignore the scientific information > concerning plus-prevention -- then they should never > complain about the consequences at a later date. Please post an authoritative reference showing that "plus-prevention" works better than placebo in humans. Parssinen tried "plus prevention" two different ways and neither one worked. Are there better studies available? -MT On Aug 7, 4:10 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote: > But once they choose to ignore the scientific information > concerning plus-prevention -- then they should never > complain about the consequences at a later date. Hey, why don't we beat this ridiculous internet scam theory to death some more. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.