 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Vision / August 2007Cali? Wouldn't you like to address....
Things like this: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/238 Quoted Verbatim. Obviously, this was typed by Otis. My home phone number was NEVER part of the original complaint, so .... he went out of his way to find it and post it. He did this on other sites, too, with or without any context--often simply posting my first, middle, and last name, home address, and phone number. [I have, of course, moved since then, but....] So ... I ask again. Is calling Otis demented, a pathological liar, or operating at diminished capacity REALLY the #1 offense around here, or is HIS disregard for fact, resulting in harm to others, AND attempting to lobby some pretty disconcerting phone calls by posting my personal information to the Web really just a tad more reprehensible? By the way, I'm glad that my inquiry was only ONE among "then uber oif cases." Very reassuring. Thanks. ============================== [quote] Commonwealth of Pennasylvania Professional Compliance Office December 29, 2005 To: Neil D. Brooks 5707 Stanta Fe St. Sandiego, CA 92109-1622 Phone: 858--483-5292 Dear Complaintant: This letter will acknowledge recipt of your formal complaint filed against Otis S. Brown We will conduct an inquiry into the allegations. Unfortunately, due to then uber oif cases, we are unable to provide regular status reports or updates. You will, at the least, benotified of the final disposition of your complaint. Thank you for your patience. Sincerely, Patty Ridley Professional Compliance Office [quote] X-no-archive: Dear Friends, Subject: Posting MY NAME all over the net. I will point out that: 1. Neil Choose to post my name and phone number all over the net. (I never offered him permission to do that.) 2. Layman Neil filed false charges against me in Penna., which forced me to contact them and find out who this person was, and what was wrong with his head. 3. I contacted the PA. agency and described Neil's antics and sent them the vearious emails he sent to me. (Not fit for public publication.) 4. They reviewed these details, and since Layman Brooks had no basis for filing anything of this nature, they put it down as a "crank" posting. 5. Further, since Brooks was in San Diego, he had no business posting any remarks to the State of Pa. But, since he posted a on a public forum, I had the right to know the poster -- who also posted my name all over the place. So Neil, stop bitching about this issue. And in fact I has lost your address some time ago. > Things like this: > [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > Professional Compliance Office > [quote] What address is in an Industrial Park??? In fact, with use of MapQuest, the address supplied to the State of PA, turned out to be in the middle of an Industrial Park. With the life-style, that Neil Brooks shows on his web-site -- how does he live off a rail road track, and in such poor conditions??? One has to wonder about that. On Aug 4, 12:38 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote: > X-no-archive: > [quoted text clipped - 89 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Commonwealth of Pennasylvania Whose address? Whose phone number. Neil Brooks does not realize his phone has been disconnected? I wonder why? In fact what I could check seemed to be a "sheltered" living facility. But you might enjoy stopping by Brook's apartment and talking about these issues with him. ================== December 29, 2005 To: Neil D. Brooks 5707 Stanta Fe St. Sandiego, CA 92109-1622 Phone: 858-483-5292 On Aug 4, 12:42 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote: > What address is in an Industrial Park??? > [quoted text clipped - 105 lines] > > - Show quoted text - >Commonwealth of Pennasylvania > >Whose address? Whose phone number. > >Neil Brooks does not realize his phone has been >disconnected? Unable to read again, are we, Uncle Otie? >I wonder why? In fact what I could check seemed >to be a "sheltered" living facility. Never let the facts get in the way of a good story, Otis. >But you might enjoy stopping by Brook's apartment and >talking about these issues with him. And, as I recall, this sort of comment is what STARTED my phone ringing in the wee hours of the morning. >================== > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Sandiego, CA 92109-1622 >Phone: 858-483-5292 Hasn't anybody ever suggested to you that--when you're in a hole--the first thing you should do is to stop digging? They probably tore the Industrial Park down by now, so the address is not correct. > On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:55:19 -0700, "otisbr...@pa.net" > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > Hasn't anybody ever suggested to you that--when you're in a hole--the > first thing you should do is to stop digging? >They probably tore the Industrial Park down by now, >so the address is not correct. You're a f.cking idiot, Otis. How do you judge Neil Brook's character??? You can always tell the "quality" of a person -- by the language he uses. It speaks for itself. Do your friends have this type of foul mouth. Do you respect a person -- posting on a public forum -- who says this??? Ask youself -- who is tearing down sci.med.vision??? > On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:05:48 -0700, "otisbr...@pa.net" > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > You're a f.cking idiot, Otis. >How do you judge Neil Brook's character??? With any luck, that's not the primary issue. Validity and accuracy of information is. >You can always tell the "quality" of a person -- by >the language he uses. I swear. You lie, defraud, hurt people, misquote, defy every rule of logic, withhold important information that would help people make better decisions, post my personal information, try to encourage people to call or stop by my HOUSE, for god's sake, and you have the audacity to question my "character?" In case anybody missed it: you're a f.cking idiot, Otis. If there was any doubt about the uncouth Brooks and his crude approach to scientific questions -- just read his last sentence. > On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:18:23 -0700, "otisbr...@pa.net" > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > In case anybody missed it: you're a f.cking idiot, Otis. On Aug 5, 10:39 am, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote: > If there was any doubt about the uncouth Brooks and > his crude approach to scientific questions -- just > read his last sentence. I can't help that, Uncle Otie. Read it again. Profanity is NOTHING against your dishonesty, irrationality, stupidity, and lack of concern about the people you've hurt. You're ... well .... um .... a f.cking idiot. It is what it is, Otis. Deal with it. > > I swear. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > > In case anybody missed it: you're a f.cking idiot, Otis. >If there was any doubt about the uncouth Brooks and >his crude approach to scientific questions -- just >read his last sentence. Yet another textbook example of what a f.cking idiot you are, Otis. Let me give you some spot-on analogies: - That Picasso beat his wife. What kind of painter COULD he have been? - That chef? He drinks too much. How COULD he cook tasty food? - That mechanic has brown spots ALL OVER his front lawn. Why WOULD I let him fix my car? - My dry cleaner is Korean. How can I trust him not to break buttons? - That pilot is wearing brown shoes with a black belt. IS IT SAFE to fly with him at the controls? - Dr's Judy and Mike BOTH have four letter first names (full, given names notwithstanding). HOW COULD they be competent eye care professionals. You're a f.cking idiot, Otis. An absolute, unmitigated, no-holds-barred f.cking idiot. Address my language all ... you ... like. I'm going to continue to have a grand old time showing people what an irrational, demented, pathological liar you are. Bring it on, Baby! >What address is in an Industrial Park??? > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >One has to wonder about that. God, but you are an idiot. Never let the facts stand in the way of a good story, Otis. You pathetic, demented, old fool. >X-no-archive: > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >1. Neil Choose to post my name and phone number >all over the net. (I never offered him permission to do that.) Liar. YOU posted your name all over the net, WITH YOUR ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER, because you were trying to sell books. >2. Layman Neil filed false charges against me in Penna., >which forced me to contact them and find out who >this person was, and what was wrong with his >head. I filed charges based on good faith evidence. It's up to the State to determine whether or not a case exists. >3. I contacted the PA. agency and described Neil's >antics and sent them the vearious emails he [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Brooks had no basis for filing anything of this nature, >they put it down as a "crank" posting. That isn't what they told me. >5. Further, since Brooks was in San Diego, he >had no business posting any remarks to the >State of Pa. That's patently untrue. Nowhere did it say that the process was limited to residents of PA. >But, since he posted a on a public forum, I had >the right to know the poster -- who also >posted my name all over the place. I have NO idea what that means, but it sounds like flat-out bullshit to me. YOU have posted your name in THOUSANDS OF PLACES, all over the Internet ... so .... liar. >So Neil, stop bitching about this issue. I hope you see that ... there's just ONE way that I'll stop my quest. When you're gone from s.m.v. >And in fact I has lost your address some time ago. Hard to imagine, since you clearly saved it in a text file and posted it on numerous sites. I guess I have your answer, Calli. Thanks. > Things like this: > [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > Professional Compliance Office > [quote] |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.