 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Vision / July 2007EYE SURGERY FOR PRESBYOPIA ( NEAR VISION GLASSES REMOVAL)
Throw off your Near Sight Bifocal or Multifocal Glasses EYE SURGERY FOR PRESBYOPIA ( NEAR VISION GLASSES REMOVAL) We are happy to announce that permanent Cure for Near sight defect (Presbyopia) with A new modality which is been practiced for Last 6 years with astounding results.( Live video surgery presented at European society of ophthalmology,Istanbul,Turkey) Even if you undergo LASIK or PRK as a young person and achieve perfect vision, you still will develop a condition called presbyopia as you grow older (typically beginning between the ages of 36 and 42). New Eye Surgery To Avoid Near Vision Glasses Dr. Gurbax Singh, Dr.Hanspal & Dr. Amrit , developed the technique at G.G.S.I. Eye Research &Cure Centre 31, Defence Enclave,Vikas Marg, Delhi claims so far no where in India such an eye surgery is performed ( Live video surgery presented at European society of ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey) Ques. What is Presbyopia ? Ans. In simple words, it is deficiency of accommodation which comes with age at 40 years, there is difficulty in near vision like reading newspaper, books etc or doing near work like putting thread in sewing needle etc. Ques. What is accommodation? Ans. This is the mechanism by which the natural lens of the eye adjusts it self to see objects at various distances. The adjustment is brought about by lens, zonules and ciliary body muscle of the eye. Ques. Where lies the defect in presbyopia ? Ans. All the three that is lens, zonules and ciliary body muscle contributes to it. Ques. Who all develop this eye condition? Ans. It generally people at the age of 40 or above start suffering from presbyopia or the deficiency of accommodation. Ques. How much time it takes to perform new eye surgery for presbyopia? Ans. It takes about 15 minutes to perform the surgery by which the deficiency of accommodation which in medical term is called as presbyopia, in the eye is corrected and the patient can does his work without using near vision glasses. Ques. After operation, does the glasses number returns Ans. No. Ques. Is this eye operation is safe? Ans. The operation is safe without any side effects and the patient is discharged the same day. Though the patient can start working without glasses from next day but full recovery of accommodation takes about a week. Ques. Is there any other means to correct presbyopia? Ans. There are many ways to correct presbyopia, but not the permanent cure like use of convex lenses, bifocal contact lenses, bifocal glasses, separate glasses for near & distance and multi focal glasses. But people suffer a lot of inconvenience in using above aids. But the new surgery of correcting the accommodation gives great relieve to the patient when he is saved from the botheration of using glasses. with regards: Dr.Hanspal web editor: www.visioncareindia.com On Jul 11, 10:27 pm, visioncareindia....@gmail.com wrote: > Throw off your Near Sight Bifocal or Multifocal Glasses > [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > > web editor:www.visioncareindia.com Hi, Are you referring to Conductive Keratoplasty for Presbyopia.If so I do have a lot information to share with all. Let's start with a basic fact: There is no "cure" for presbyopia. Schachar's theory did not hold up. Everything else from monovision to multifocals to Nearvision CK are a workaround. None create accommodation. If you go to the website you find only what has been presented here plus a link to a paper purportedly presented in 2001 at a European ophthalmic congress, however the image is chopped off so nothing of substance is visible. How it is that this particular doctor in India has kept the "cure for presbyopia" a secret for six years (and apparently desires to continue to do so) is beyond belief. Why the doctor elects to cover the "discovery" in subterfuge raises more than enough suspicion. Glenn Hagele Executive Director USAEyes (TM) Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification "Consider and Choose With Confidence" (TM) Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org http://www.USAEyes.org Lasik Bulletin Board http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/ I am not a doctor. Copyright 2007 All Rights Reserved On Jul 12, 8:46 pm, Glenn - USAEyes.org <glenn.hageleSTOPS...@USAEyes.org> wrote: > Let's start with a basic fact: There is no "cure" forpresbyopia. > Schachar's theory did not hold up. Everything else from monovision to [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Copyright 2007 > All Rights Reserve please dont make wrong comment There is no "cure" for presbyopia. Yes Schachar R. (1992) Schachar's theory did not hold up to some extent... because:- Radical cut to introduce scleral band circumferentially see table :- SURGICAL TECHNIQUES :- Schachar R. (1992) 4 eyes Radical cut to introduce scleral band 2.2D accomodation circumferentially. Jose Benz (1999) 9 eyes Four PMMA Micro Segment implants Fukasaku (1999) 12eyes One pair of 3 mm long cuts in 4 quadrants. 2.2D accomodation Gurbax & Hanspal (2001) 20eyes Anterior Sclerotomy with lifting of 10.80+0.79 accomodation sclera + implant The mechanism of accommodation has been normalised by combination and permutation of following changes: - Increase in length of the eye by 0.34mm preaccommodated to 0.88mm during accommodated. Shifting of anterior pole of the lens backwards in preaccommodated and more so accommodated state. Decrease in the length of posterior pole of the lens. Changes in the lens. Decrease in preaccommodated thickness of the lens. Increase in the thickness of the lens during accommodation and decrease in pre-accommodated state. Decrease in I.L.C. Leading to normalization of lens substances. we have lot of work in presbyopia :- Biometric Changes in the Eye & Their Relationship to Accommodation in Various Age Groups ADVANTAGES OF U.S.G. IN THIS STUDY Easy to perform. The changes which are seen are definite. It gives details about all the parameters of the eye which is not possible with even with partial coherence inferometry. It demonstrates even the intra-lenticular changes which are not seen with other techniques which are going to be helpful in the study of Presbyopia. The post-operative serial U.S.G. in presbyopic surgery is helpful in demonstrating the mechanism of utility of a particular operation in accommodation. ------ Biometric changes in the eye and their relationship to accommodation in various age groups has been very helpful in laying the basic data in these groups which is lacking in the literature. We feel that the accommodation is brought about not by a single parameter of the eye but it results from the combination and permutations of the various factors responsible for accommodation which includes length of the eye, thickness of the lens, intra- lenticular changes, anterior pole of the lens, posterior pole of the lens The length of the eye & anterior pole of the lens decrease during accommodation and increasing age. The thickness of the lens, posterior pole of the lens and intra- lenticular changes increase during accommodation as well as with the increasing age. This study has put forward a classification of the intra-lenticular changes which has been classified for the first time which may be helpful in the study of age related changes. I'd be as delighted as anyone if presbyopia could be cured, but no one has come up with a reliable and predictable way to cure presbyopia. There are several attempts, many workarounds, but no cures. When someone claims a cure, provides no details of the methodology, and then cuts off the "paper" purportedly presented six years ago in the middle of the sentence (literally the middle) without any substantive information, I'm more than inclined to suspect a massive lack of credible science backing the claim. Subject the device to the scrutiny of the appropriate government agencies, and perhaps there will be something more than wishful thinking. Submit your technique with supporting scientific studies to a peer reviewed journal, and then we might have something to talk about. Perhaps you have something worthwhile, but until it can be replicated it is nothing more than ghosts in the attic. Glenn Hagele Executive Director USAEyes (TM) Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification "Consider and Choose With Confidence" (TM) Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org http://www.USAEyes.org Lasik Bulletin Board http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/ I am not a doctor. Copyright 2007 All Rights Reserved On Jul 12, 8:46 pm, Glenn - USAEyes.org <glenn.hageleSTOPS...@USAEyes.org> wrote: > Let's start with a basic fact: There is no "cure" for presbyopia. > Schachar's theory did not hold up. Everything else from monovision to [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Copyright 2007 > All Rights Reserved On Jun 24, 2:12 pm, Glenn - USAEyes.org - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - <glenn.hageleSTOPS...@USAEyes.org> wrote: > Around and around she goes ignoring facts that disprove her anti-Lasik > mania, like a decade of international Lasik studies and government > approvals, millions of satisfied patients, air force fighter pilots > approved to have (all-laser) Lasik, and that the Lasik flap does heal, > but not like a scratch on your arm. Seehttp://www.usaeyes.org/lasik/faq/lasik-flap-heal.htm > That Lauranell "Nell" Burch, a staff scientist at the National > Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, would describe a > successful surgical outcome in the absence of clinically significant > complications as a "permanent adverse effect", clearly shows that you > cannot discuss reason and logic with an unreasonable and illogical > person. > That Lauranell "Nell" Burch would publicize my personal identity > including Social Security number on her website shows just how > illogical and unreasonable she is. If you don't buy into her mania, > she will attack you, defame you, and expose you to identity theft. > The Sunday May 6th edition of the News & Observer, a major North > Carolina newspaper, carries an article about Lauranell "Nell" Burch > publicizing on her website the personal information of patient > advocate GlennHagele, including Social Security number, drivers > license number, bank account numbers, credit card numbers, and more. > Forty six pages of documents includingHagele'spersonal identity were > made available at Lauranell "Nell" Burch's website. These pages have > been preserved, witnessed, notarized, and examined by North Carolina > officials. An example of a few of these pages with numbers redacted is > available at:http://www.GlennHagele.com/LauranellBurch/CyberAssassin.pdf > The news article is available athttp://www.newsobserver.com/104/story/571344.html > After a detailed investigation of the facts, the North Carolina > Attorney General issued a "cease and desist" letter to Lauranell [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > information on Lauranell "Nell" Burch and a copy of the Attorney > General's letter, visithttp://www.GlennHagele.com/LauranellBurch/ > GlennHagele > Executive Director > USAEyes (TM) > Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification > "Consider and Choose With Confidence" (TM) > Email to glenn dothageleat usaeyes dot org > http://www.USAEyes.org > Lasik Bulletin Boardhttp://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/ > I am not a doctor. > Copyright 2007 > All Rights Reserved TO EVERYONE REGARDING GLENN HAGELE: BE VERY, VERY CAREFUL OF GLENN HAGELE AND CRSQA. I HEAR THAT GLENN HAGELE HAS "DONE IT AGAIN, AND IN A VERY BAD WAY, AND COULD BE IN VERY SERIOUS TROUBLE WITH THE LAW OUT OF FLORIDA..." MORE COMING SOON. AND HIS WIFE AND CHILDREN SHOULD ALSO BE MADE AWARE OF THIS. MY ADVICE TO MR. HAGELE WOULD BE "TO BE CAREFUL IN WHAT YOU ACCUSE OTHERS OF, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU ARE CONVICTED OF A CRIMINAL ACT YOURSELF..." GOD AND MOTHER NATURE HAVE A WAY OF EXPOSING THE REAL TRUTHS IN DUE TIME...LOOKS LIKE YOUR TIME IS COMING SOON... MORE ON CRSQA DOCTORS AND GLENN HAGELE'S ACTS OF BULLSHIT AND DESPERATION AT: IS THIS THE SAME GLENN HAGELE THAT "PLAYS GOD" AND SAYS THIS PERSON IS LYING WHEN IT IS INDEED GLENN HAGELE AND ALL OF HIS ONGOING LYING BLOGS?? IS THIS THE SAME GLENN HAGELE THAT HAS BEEN KNOWN TO HARASS HURT LASIK PATIENTS? IS THIS GLENN HAGELE WHO GOT A HURT LASIK PATIENT FIRED? IS THIS GLENN HAGELE WHO HIDES BEHIND HIS COMPUTER KEYBOARD AND WORKS OUT OF HIS HOUSE? IS THIS GLENN HAGELE WHO IS "PRO LASIK DOCTOR" AND "ANTI HURT LASIK PATIENT?" IS THIS GLENN HAGELE, HIGH SCHOOL DEGREE GLENN HAGELE WHO LEADS "DOCTORATE LEVEL DOCTORS" AT $5,000 A YEAR FOR A MEMBERSHIP CALLED CRSQA, THAT ISN'T EVEN RECOGNIZED BY ANY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND THANKS TO US IS UNDER INVESTIGATION AS A "NON PROFIT?" IS THIS THE SAME GLENN HAGELE THAT HAD TO "IMPORT" A RUSSIAN WIFE BECAUSE NO ONE HERE IN THE STATES WOULD PUT UP WITH HIS BULLSHIT? THAT GLENN HAGELE...OH...MAY GOD HAVE MERCY ON HIS SOUL FOR WHAT HE HAS DONE TO HURT SO MANY PEOPLE!! THAT GLENN HAGELE??? USAEYES AND COMPLICATED EYES HEADED BY THIS MAN???? HELLO EVERYONE: FIRST IT IS GLENN HAGELE THAT IS CONSIDERED BY HUNDREDS TO BE A "DEEPLY DISTURBED" AND "UNSTABLE INDIVIDUAL." MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT, HE DOES NOT CARE ABOUT HURT LASIK PATIENTS AND IS RATHER PAID TO MAKE ALL OF THEM AND THEIR WEBSITES GO AWAY...RATHER, IF THE TRUTH BE TOLD, GLENN HAGELE IS IN "BED" WITH THE DOCTORS THAT PAY FOR HIS OFFICE/HOUSE PAYMENT...EVERYONE KNOWS THIS, AND NOW SO DO YOU. HE HAS TRIED TO HURT MY FAMILY AS WELL THROUGH ONLINE HARASSMENT AND EVEN CONTACTED THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THAT I SERVE AS 2ND VICE PRESIDENT ON TO TRY TO GET ME TERMINATED FROM THE BOARD, AND BECAUSE OF HIS ACTIONS, I AM COMMITTED TO SPREAD THE TRUTH UNTIL THE TRUTH HELPS HIM TO GO BANCRUPT AGAIN...HE DID THIS TO HIMSELF, BECAUSE GLENN HAGELE DOESN'T KNOW WHEN TO SHUT HIS MOUTH AND NOT "BUD IN." OH, BUT MAYBE HE IS "PAID" TO DO SOMEONE ELSES DIRTY WORK AND BUD IN...BUT THAT IS GLENN HAGELE, AND THUS THE REASON HE IS IN TROUBLE WITH THE FLORIDA LAW...(COMING SOON)... HE WILL TELL YOU THAT I AM IN TROUBLE WITH THE FBI, FOR AN ATTEMPT TO EXTORT MONEY (GLENN CAN'T VALIDATE THIS, IT IS GLENN HAGELE THAT HAS COME INTO TROUBLE WITH THE LAW, AND HE JUST KEEPS TALKING OUT OF HIS a.s)...FROM THE PIECE OF sh.t LASIK DOCTOR NAMED NICK CARO, WHO DID INDEED RUIN MY VISION, HAS 60+ LAWSUITS, AN ILLEGAL BLACK BOX LASER THAT HAD TO BE SEIZED BY US MARSHALLS, PISTOLS DRAWN AT THE REQUEST OF THE FDA BECAUSE NICK CARO WAS HARMING INNOCENT PEOPLE... MORE ON GLENN HAGELE: WWW.USAEYES.INFO WWW.LASIKFLAP.COM WWW.LIFEAFTERLASIK.COM WWW.LASIKFRAUD.COM WWW.LASIKSUCKS4U.COM I WON'T REST UNTIL NICK CARO IS IN JAIL AND GLENN HAGELE IS IN THE JAIL CELL NEXT TO HIM FOR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO MYSELF, TO MY FAMILY AND TO MY DEAR FRIENDS WHO HAVEN'T DONE A DARN THING TO GLENN HAGELE OR HIS FAMILY...(IN FACT, YOU WOULD HAVE TO KILL ME FOR ME TO STOP CONTACTING THE LEGAL DEPARTMENTS WITH ONGOING COMPLAINTS...) THE PERSON DESCRIBED ABOVE, GLENN HAGELE, IS ANYTHING BUT HONEST AND SURELY ISN'T A PATIENT ADVOCATE. HE HAS ATTEMPTED TO "HARASS AND INJURE" KNOWN HURT- LASIK -PATIENTS... HE IS IN SERIOUS TROUBLE WITH THE LAW, SO I HEAR, AND THIS WILL ALL BE MADE VERY PUBLIC SOON ENOUGH, AS I HEAR HE HAS GOTTEN IN TO SOME SERIOUS CHARGES OUT OF FLORIDA...I THINK EVERY CRSQA SURGEON SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THIS AS WELL, AND SOON ENOUGH, THEY WILL... HAVE THE FOLLOWING CRSQA DOCTORS FIGURED OUT THAT THEY ARE PAYING GLENN HAGELE $5,000 A YEAR TO RUIN THEIR REPUTATIONS? I WILL MAKE SURE THEY KNOW...ANY DOCTOR BELOW DOING BUSINESS WITH GLENN HAGELE SHOULD BE UNDER FULL EXAMINATION BY MULTIPLE LAW DEPARTMENTS FOR HAVING "TIES" TO A CRIMINAL... HERE IS THE LIST OF "POTENTIAL CRSQA DOCTORS" THAT ARE WORKING WITH A "CRIMINAL:" Lasik Doctor Kerry Assil Lasik Doctor Jay Bansal Lasik Doctor Daniel Beers Lasik Doctor Scott Behler Lasik Doctor Robert Brems Lasik Doctor Stephen Brint Lasik Doctor Ronald Brown Lasik Doctor Randy Burks Lasik Doctor Andrew Caster Lasik Doctor Benjamin Chang Lasik Doctor David Dulaney Lasik Doctor Daniel Durrie Lasik Doctor Ella Faktorovich Lasik Doctor Raymond Gailitis Lasik Doctor Robert Gladsden Lasik Doctor Daniel Goldberg Lasik Doctor Jack T Holladay Lasik Doctor Thierry Hufhagel Lasik Doctor Kent Kirk (isn't this guy the one on the video telling how great the statistics were about Alcon, i think many people lost a lot of credibility for this guy, as in our opinions...he seemed to be lying through his eyes) Lasik Doctor Robert Lin Lasik Doctor Richard Lindstrom Lasik Doctor Robert Maloney (isn't this the guy that just did lasik on Kristen from Laguna Beach, who is like 20 years old...can you believe a doctor would do that for publicity??? she's a kid, and who can say if her eyes are stable and he just did lasik on her for probably what...exposure??...very sick, two words: DEEPLY DISTURBING!!) Lasik Doctor James McDonald Lasik Doctor Michael Mockovak Lasik Doctor Sanford Moretsky Lasik Doctor Thomas Planchard Lasik Doctor Philip Roholt Lasik Doctor James Rynerson Lasik Doctor Cary M Silverman Lasik Doctor Swati Singh Lasik Doctor Barrie Soloway Lasik Doctor Gregory Stainer Lasik Doctor Harmon Stein Lasik Doctor Steven Stetson Lasik Doctor Dan Tran Lasik Doctor Mark Volpicelli Lasik Doctor David A Wallace Lasik Doctor Robert Weisenthal Lasik Doctor Marc Werner Lasik Doctor Norman Zaffater Reply Reply to author Regardless of the false statements against me being repeated in this thread, there is no cure for presbyopia and the current propagator from south Asia continues to obfuscate the methodology that s/he claims attains the unattainable. I've become the person at which a handful of people who had a bad Lasik outcome have decided to direct their ire. Their attacks include lying about my financial history, insulting my wife, publishing my personal identity, defamation, trademark infringement, listing doctors we have not certified as recommended, harassing those who fund and govern our organization, and often doing this while hiding behind false identities and multiple aliases. Considering the work I do to advocate for Lasik patients and the nonprofit patient advocacy I founded, their acts seem to have no logic or reason. Even stranger is the fact that these people did not seek our information before surgery and did not use doctors certified by our organization, but you can't use logic and reason on illogical and unreasonable people. The outrageous accusations, manipulations, half-truths, outright lies, false complaints, and attacks on me and others by these anti-Lasik zealots have caused them some serious trouble. One had the FBI show up at his door investigating an alleged extortion attempt against his former surgeon. Another has the Attorney General investigating her for publicizing my personal identity including Social Security number on her website. Her employer is investigating how her access to federal secure computer systems was used to publish defamation on the Internet, and she uses so many aliases it is hard to keep up. Another has a permanent restraining order against him for threatening Dallas Lasik doctor William Boothe, MD with physical violence, has been sued for defamation, lost, found in contempt of court and sentenced to jail, is in bankruptcy, cyber-pirated our organization's trademark domain, plus I'm personally suing him for defamation and invasion of privacy in California Superior Court.. Rather than copy and pasting the details again and again, just Google: Brent Hanson http://tinyurl.com/yrjayg Lauranell "Nell" Burch http://tinyurl.com/2y74l7 Dean Andrew Kantis http://tinyurl.com/2zf3qa Or you can stop by my personal website: http://www.GlennHagele.com For those who would like to form their own opinion about the work I do and the organization I founded, visit our website and/or our Lasik Patient Forum listed below my signature. One more thing: USAEyes is a trademark of the Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance (http://www.USAEyes.org). The use of usaeyes.INFO, usaeyes.BIZ, usaeyes.NET, usaeyes.US, and other use of USAEyes by Brent Hanson is not approved by Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance and appears to be a violation of the US Federal Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, regulations under the authority of the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), and other trademark law. Glenn Hagele Executive Director USAEyes (TM) Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification "Consider and Choose With Confidence" (TM) Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org http://www.USAEyes.org Lasik Bulletin Board http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/ I am not a doctor. Copyright 2007 All Rights Reserved On Jul 12, 8:46 pm, Glenn - USAEyes.org <glenn.hageleSTOPS...@USAEyes.org> wrote: > Let's start with a basic fact: There is no "cure" for presbyopia. > Schachar's theory did not hold up. Everything else from monovision to [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Copyright 2007 > All Rights Reserved On Jul 4, 12:35 am, capnspaldi...@yahoo.com wrote: > > GlennHagele > > I am not a doctor. HERE IS MY OWN INTERPRETATION OF WHAT A PIECE OF sh.t, THE LOWEST AND STINKIEST, A PERSON NAMED GLENN HAGELE IS...HE HAS LOST HIS SOUL, IN MANY'S OPINION, AND IS THE WORST NIGHTMARE ONE COULD POSSIBLY HAVE. I AM A HURT LASIK PATIENT, AND HE TRIED TO BLACKMAIL ME, PERIOD! I HAVE COMPLAINTS IN TO VARIOUS US DEPARTMENTS ON HIS DEEPLY DISTURBING BEHAVIOR. GLENN HAGELE COULDN'T TELL YOU ABOUT A FLAP, MICROSCOPICALLY SPEAKING, IF HIS LIFE AND HIS RUSSIAN WIFE'S DEPENDED ON IT!! HE IS JUST READING FROM TEXT...AT BEST, JUST LIKE A HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT REPEATS A TEACHER'S WORKS...GLENN HAGELE HAS NO CLUE AS TO WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT. HE HAS NO MEDICAL DEGREE, AND THEREFORE, YOU SHOULDN'T TAKE ANY ADVICE HE GIVES YOU. PERIOD. HE IS A HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT GRADUATE AT BEST!! HE HAS SHOWN TO BE AN IMMORAL PERSON THAT LACKS TRUST, INTEGRITY AND MORALS ON ALL LEVELS... Google search: Glenn Hagele CRSQA First advice, I WOULDN'T TAKE ANY ADVICE FROM A Glenn Hagele...he's been a proven liar, he's been found to have violated laws, he's filed for BANCRUPTCY, and he has been found guilty of trying to blackmail hurt lasik patients and is full of sh.t, period, end of story... Hopefully all of the sh.t that he has put out on others will haunt him and his family very soon, IT IS SEROUSLY OVERDUE, and will come back full circle and when it does, it will be out all over the web, rest assured. In my opinion, he is a SICK, DEEPLY DISTURBED INDIVIDUAL, that has been proven to LIE, LIE, LIE and call everybody else "less than credible" when if the truth be told, MR. GLENN HAGELE HAS NO CREDIBILITY...PROBABLY NEVER HAS!! Lets look at the credibility or discredibility of Glenn Hagele, who takes on a God complex, has a HIGH SCHOOL diploma, and is talking down to a scientist/doctor that is proven, educated, not to mention many others. Instead of this moron trying to work with a hurt lasik patient, as you would think a PATIENT ADVOCATE promotes, he has chosen to serve the DARK SIDE, and has earned that reputation... Here is what we have gathered on the discredibility of Glenn Hagele and YOU SHOULD know this: http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?um=1&tab=wb&hl=en&q=glenn%20h... www.UsaEyes.info http://www.lasikflap.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=21&sid=9823ffd3db2bccf... http://www.lasikfraud.com/ PS-GLENN HAGELE IS A BOTTOM FEEDER, BELOW THE LOWEST ATTORNEYS!! AND THAT IS INDEED A COMPLIMENT!! Regardless of the false statements against me being repeated in this thread, there is no cure for presbyopia and the current propagator from south Asia continues to obfuscate the methodology that s/he claims attains the unattainable. I've become the person at which a handful of people who had a bad Lasik outcome have decided to direct their ire. Their attacks include lying about my financial history, insulting my wife, publishing my personal identity, defamation, trademark infringement, listing doctors we have not certified as recommended, harassing those who fund and govern our organization, and often doing this while hiding behind false identities and multiple aliases. Considering the work I do to advocate for Lasik patients and the nonprofit patient advocacy I founded, their acts seem to have no logic or reason. Even stranger is the fact that these people did not seek our information before surgery and did not use doctors certified by our organization, but you can't use logic and reason on illogical and unreasonable people. The outrageous accusations, manipulations, half-truths, outright lies, false complaints, and attacks on me and others by these anti-Lasik zealots have caused them some serious trouble. One had the FBI show up at his door investigating an alleged extortion attempt against his former surgeon. Another has the Attorney General investigating her for publicizing my personal identity including Social Security number on her website. Her employer is investigating how her access to federal secure computer systems was used to publish defamation on the Internet, and she uses so many aliases it is hard to keep up. Another has a permanent restraining order against him for threatening Dallas Lasik doctor William Boothe, MD with physical violence, has been sued for defamation, lost, found in contempt of court and sentenced to jail, is in bankruptcy, cyber-pirated our organization's trademark domain, plus I'm personally suing him for defamation and invasion of privacy in California Superior Court.. Rather than copy and pasting the details again and again, just Google: Brent Hanson http://tinyurl.com/yrjayg Lauranell "Nell" Burch http://tinyurl.com/2y74l7 Dean Andrew Kantis http://tinyurl.com/2zf3qa Or you can stop by my personal website: http://www.GlennHagele.com For those who would like to form their own opinion about the work I do and the organization I founded, visit our website and/or our Lasik Patient Forum listed below my signature. One more thing: USAEyes is a trademark of the Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance (http://www.USAEyes.org). The use of usaeyes.INFO, usaeyes.BIZ, usaeyes.NET, usaeyes.US, and other use of USAEyes by Brent Hanson is not approved by Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance and appears to be a violation of the US Federal Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, regulations under the authority of the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), and other trademark law. Glenn Hagele Executive Director USAEyes (TM) Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification "Consider and Choose With Confidence" (TM) Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org http://www.USAEyes.org Lasik Bulletin Board http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/ I am not a doctor. Copyright 2007 All Rights Reserved > On Jul 11, 10:27 pm, visioncareindia....@gmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 81 lines] > Are you referring to Conductive Keratoplasty for Presbyopia.If so I do > have a lot information to share with all. personally, I would like to hear about your information. I also am interested in knowing the reliability/efficacy of other approaches to reducing presbyopia (e.g. scleral expanding bands, etc.). > > On Jul 11, 10:27 pm, visioncareindia....@gmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 87 lines] > > - Show quoted text - please dont make wrong comment There is no "cure" for presbyopia. Yes Schachar R. (1992) Schachar's theory did not hold up to some extent... because:- Radical cut to introduce scleral band circumferentially see table :- SURGICAL TECHNIQUES :- Schachar R. (1992) 4 eyes Radical cut to introduce scleral band 2.2D accomodation circumferentially. Jose Benz (1999) 9 eyes Four PMMA Micro Segment implants Fukasaku (1999) 12eyes One pair of 3 mm long cuts in 4 quadrants. 2.2D accomodation Gurbax & Hanspal (2001) 20eyes Anterior Sclerotomy with lifting of 10.80+0.79 accomodation sclera + implant The mechanism of accommodation has been normalised by combination and permutation of following changes: - Increase in length of the eye by 0.34mm preaccommodated to 0.88mm during accommodated. Shifting of anterior pole of the lens backwards in preaccommodated and more so accommodated state. Decrease in the length of posterior pole of the lens. Changes in the lens. Decrease in preaccommodated thickness of the lens. Increase in the thickness of the lens during accommodation and decrease in pre-accommodated state. Decrease in I.L.C. Leading to normalization of lens substances. we have lot of work in presbyopia :- Biometric Changes in the Eye & Their Relationship to Accommodation in Various Age Groups ADVANTAGES OF U.S.G. IN THIS STUDY Easy to perform. The changes which are seen are definite. It gives details about all the parameters of the eye which is not possible with even with partial coherence inferometry. It demonstrates even the intra-lenticular changes which are not seen with other techniques which are going to be helpful in the study of Presbyopia. The post-operative serial U.S.G. in presbyopic surgery is helpful in demonstrating the mechanism of utility of a particular operation in accommodation. ------ Biometric changes in the eye and their relationship to accommodation in various age groups has been very helpful in laying the basic data in these groups which is lacking in the literature. We feel that the accommodation is brought about not by a single parameter of the eye but it results from the combination and permutations of the various factors responsible for accommodation which includes length of the eye, thickness of the lens, intra- lenticular changes, anterior pole of the lens, posterior pole of the lens The length of the eye & anterior pole of the lens decrease during accommodation and increasing age. The thickness of the lens, posterior pole of the lens and intra- lenticular changes increase during accommodation as well as with the increasing age. This study has put forward a classification of the intra-lenticular changes which has been classified for the first time which may be helpful in the study of age related changes. On Jul 11, 10:27 pm, visioncareindia....@gmail.com wrote: > Throw off your Near Sight Bifocal or Multifocal Glasses > [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > > web editor:www.visioncareindia.com ABOUT GLENN HAGELE EXCUSE ME FOR BUDDING IN, BUT DR. LAURANELL BURCH IS A RESPECTED SCIENTIST, AND GLENN HAGELE IS A "HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE" AT BEST...GLENN HAGELE HAS TARGETED HARASSING CAMPAIGNS AT MANY HURT LASIK PATIENTS OVER THE YEARS, ONE I HEARD HE HAS EVEN SUCCEEDED IN GETTING "FIRED" FROM HER PREVOUS POSITION THANKS TO HIS "PATIENT ADVOCACY WAYS..." IN OUR OPINION, HE IS NOTHING BUT A "HURT LASIK PATIENT HATER," HE AS EARNED THIS REPUTATION FOR HIS VERBAL AND LIBELOUS ACTIONS, WHICH IN MANY WAYS I AND MANY OTHER HAVE FOUND TO BE "RATHER CRIMINAL" IN NATURE... HE IS SOMEONE THAT WE BELIEVE CAN NOT BE TRUSTED, HE SEEMS TO POINT THE FINGER AT EVERYONE ELSE BUT HIMSELF, AND HOW HE CAN LOOK HIMSELF IN THE MIRROR FOR HIS LYING, HARASSING WAYS, IS BEYOND MY UNDERSTANDING, BUT HE STILL GETS UP AND DOES THE DAMAGE HE DOES...AFTER ALL, THAT IS THE REAL GLENN HAGELE... I WILL END SAYING THAT "WHAT GOES AROUND EVENTUALLY COMES FULL CIRCLE." I AM SURE THAT NATURE'S LAW WILL PROVE THIS TO BE SOONER RATHER THAN LATER WITH MR. GLENN HAGELE. I AM HEARING THAT MANY CRSQA DOCTORS ARE DISGUSTED WITH MR. HAGELE'S ACTIONS, AND HAVE FINALLY FIGURED OUT THAT IT IS "MORE OF A DETRIMENT THAN A BENEFIT" TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH MR. GLENN HAGELE. MORE ON GLENN HAGELE AND WHAT HE STANDS FOR AT: WWW.LIFEAFTERLASIK.COM WWW.LASIKFLAPC.OM WWW.USAEYES.INFO WWW.LASIKFRAUD.COM GOOGLE SEARCH: GLENN HAGELE CRSQA OR SIMPLY CLICK HERE: http://www.google.com/custom?q=glenn+hagele+crsqa+doctors+scam&sa=Sea... Regardless of the false statements against me being repeated in this thread, there is no cure for presbyopia and the current propagator from south Asia continues to obfuscate the methodology that s/he claims attains the unattainable. I've become the person at which a handful of people who had a bad Lasik outcome have decided to direct their ire. Their attacks include lying about my financial history, insulting my wife, publishing my personal identity, defamation, trademark infringement, listing doctors we have not certified as recommended, harassing those who fund and govern our organization, and often doing this while hiding behind false identities and multiple aliases. Considering the work I do to advocate for Lasik patients and the nonprofit patient advocacy I founded, their acts seem to have no logic or reason. Even stranger is the fact that these people did not seek our information before surgery and did not use doctors certified by our organization, but you can't use logic and reason on illogical and unreasonable people. The outrageous accusations, manipulations, half-truths, outright lies, false complaints, and attacks on me and others by these anti-Lasik zealots have caused them some serious trouble. One had the FBI show up at his door investigating an alleged extortion attempt against his former surgeon. Another has the Attorney General investigating her for publicizing my personal identity including Social Security number on her website. Her employer is investigating how her access to federal secure computer systems was used to publish defamation on the Internet, and she uses so many aliases it is hard to keep up. Another has a permanent restraining order against him for threatening Dallas Lasik doctor William Boothe, MD with physical violence, has been sued for defamation, lost, found in contempt of court and sentenced to jail, is in bankruptcy, cyber-pirated our organization's trademark domain, plus I'm personally suing him for defamation and invasion of privacy in California Superior Court.. Rather than copy and pasting the details again and again, just Google: Brent Hanson http://tinyurl.com/yrjayg Lauranell "Nell" Burch http://tinyurl.com/2y74l7 Dean Andrew Kantis http://tinyurl.com/2zf3qa Or you can stop by my personal website: http://www.GlennHagele.com For those who would like to form their own opinion about the work I do and the organization I founded, visit our website and/or our Lasik Patient Forum listed below my signature. One more thing: USAEyes is a trademark of the Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance (http://www.USAEyes.org). The use of usaeyes.INFO, usaeyes.BIZ, usaeyes.NET, usaeyes.US, and other use of USAEyes by Brent Hanson is not approved by Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance and appears to be a violation of the US Federal Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, regulations under the authority of the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), and other trademark law. Glenn Hagele Executive Director USAEyes (TM) Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification "Consider and Choose With Confidence" (TM) Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org http://www.USAEyes.org Lasik Bulletin Board http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/ I am not a doctor. Copyright 2007 All Rights Reserved >ABOUT GLENN HAGELE Nobody cares. Sorry you're all hurt. You sound a lot like Otis Brown. Do you know Otis? Maybe, instead of posting here, you guys should just start a private, e-mail-based dialogue? > Maybe, instead of posting here, you guys should > just start a private, e-mail-based dialogue? And just who the hell elected YOU hall monitor? Tell you who - Nobody. On Jul 11, 10:27 pm, visioncareindia....@gmail.com wrote: > Throw off your Near Sight Bifocal or Multifocal Glasses > [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > > web editor:www.visioncareindia.com On Jul 4, 12:35 am, capnspaldi...@yahoo.com wrote: > > GlennHagele > > I am not a doctor. HERE IS MY OWN INTERPRETATION OF WHAT A PIECE OF sh.t, THE LOWEST AND STINKIEST, A PERSON NAMED GLENN HAGELE IS...HE HAS LOST HIS SOUL, IN MANY'S OPINION, AND IS THE WORST NIGHTMARE ONE COULD POSSIBLY HAVE. I AM A HURT LASIK PATIENT, AND HE TRIED TO BLACKMAIL ME, PERIOD! I HAVE COMPLAINTS IN TO VARIOUS US DEPARTMENTS ON HIS DEEPLY DISTURBING BEHAVIOR. GLENN HAGELE COULDN'T TELL YOU ABOUT A FLAP, MICROSCOPICALLY SPEAKING, IF HIS LIFE AND HIS RUSSIAN WIFE'S DEPENDED ON IT!! HE IS JUST READING FROM TEXT...AT BEST, JUST LIKE A HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT REPEATS A TEACHER'S WORKS...GLENN HAGELE HAS NO CLUE AS TO WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT. HE HAS NO MEDICAL DEGREE, AND THEREFORE, YOU SHOULDN'T TAKE ANY ADVICE HE GIVES YOU. PERIOD. HE IS A HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT GRADUATE AT BEST!! HE HAS SHOWN TO BE AN IMMORAL PERSON THAT LACKS TRUST, INTEGRITY AND MORALS ON ALL LEVELS... Google search: Glenn Hagele CRSQA First advice, I WOULDN'T TAKE ANY ADVICE FROM A Glenn Hagele...he's been a proven liar, he's been found to have violated laws, he's filed for BANCRUPTCY, and he has been found guilty of trying to blackmail hurt lasik patients and is full of sh.t, period, end of story... Hopefully all of the sh.t that he has put out on others will haunt him and his family very soon, IT IS SEROUSLY OVERDUE, and will come back full circle and when it does, it will be out all over the web, rest assured. In my opinion, he is a SICK, DEEPLY DISTURBED INDIVIDUAL, that has been proven to LIE, LIE, LIE and call everybody else "less than credible" when if the truth be told, MR. GLENN HAGELE HAS NO CREDIBILITY...PROBABLY NEVER HAS!! Lets look at the credibility or discredibility of Glenn Hagele, who takes on a God complex, has a HIGH SCHOOL diploma, and is talking down to a scientist/doctor that is proven, educated, not to mention many others. Instead of this moron trying to work with a hurt lasik patient, as you would think a PATIENT ADVOCATE promotes, he has chosen to serve the DARK SIDE, and has earned that reputation... Here is what we have gathered on the discredibility of Glenn Hagele and YOU SHOULD know this: http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?um=1&tab=wb&hl=en&q=glenn%20h... www.UsaEyes.info http://www.lasikflap.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=21&sid=9823ffd3db2bccf... http://www.lasikfraud.com/ PS-GLENN HAGELE IS A BOTTOM FEEDER, BELOW THE LOWEST ATTORNEYS!! AND THAT IS INDEED A COMPLIMENT!! Regardless of the false statements against me being repeated in this thread, there is no cure for presbyopia and the current propagator from south Asia continues to obfuscate the methodology that s/he claims attains the unattainable. I've become the person at which a handful of people who had a bad Lasik outcome have decided to direct their ire. Their attacks include lying about my financial history, insulting my wife, publishing my personal identity, defamation, trademark infringement, listing doctors we have not certified as recommended, harassing those who fund and govern our organization, and often doing this while hiding behind false identities and multiple aliases. Considering the work I do to advocate for Lasik patients and the nonprofit patient advocacy I founded, their acts seem to have no logic or reason. Even stranger is the fact that these people did not seek our information before surgery and did not use doctors certified by our organization, but you can't use logic and reason on illogical and unreasonable people. The outrageous accusations, manipulations, half-truths, outright lies, false complaints, and attacks on me and others by these anti-Lasik zealots have caused them some serious trouble. One had the FBI show up at his door investigating an alleged extortion attempt against his former surgeon. Another has the Attorney General investigating her for publicizing my personal identity including Social Security number on her website. Her employer is investigating how her access to federal secure computer systems was used to publish defamation on the Internet, and she uses so many aliases it is hard to keep up. Another has a permanent restraining order against him for threatening Dallas Lasik doctor William Boothe, MD with physical violence, has been sued for defamation, lost, found in contempt of court and sentenced to jail, is in bankruptcy, cyber-pirated our organization's trademark domain, plus I'm personally suing him for defamation and invasion of privacy in California Superior Court.. Rather than copy and pasting the details again and again, just Google: Brent Hanson http://tinyurl.com/yrjayg Lauranell "Nell" Burch http://tinyurl.com/2y74l7 Dean Andrew Kantis http://tinyurl.com/2zf3qa Or you can stop by my personal website: http://www.GlennHagele.com For those who would like to form their own opinion about the work I do and the organization I founded, visit our website and/or our Lasik Patient Forum listed below my signature. One more thing: USAEyes is a trademark of the Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance (http://www.USAEyes.org). The use of usaeyes.INFO, usaeyes.BIZ, usaeyes.NET, usaeyes.US, and other use of USAEyes by Brent Hanson is not approved by Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance and appears to be a violation of the US Federal Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, regulations under the authority of the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), and other trademark law. Glenn Hagele Executive Director USAEyes (TM) Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification "Consider and Choose With Confidence" (TM) Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org http://www.USAEyes.org Lasik Bulletin Board http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/ I am not a doctor. Copyright 2007 All Rights Reserved |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.