 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Vision / June 2007Wrong as always, Uncle Scrotis
>From his personal soapbox: "Subject: Neil Brooks method of improving your vision -- FYI. Neil Brooks states that he is not an ophthamologist, but he does say that his ophthamologist is Dr. David Granet (San Diego). Neil thinks Granet is great, so I assume that he worked out his method, and got approval from Dr. Granet for this method of relaxation." Wrong as always, Señor DoucheBag. Dr. Granet knows nothing of the at- home methods that I use. Are you EVER right? Ever?? Can you even SPELL "ophthalmologist?" Do you know the meaning of the word? You have the stones to harass people for not capitalizing letters, but you are substantively wrong, dishonest, and crazy time and again. Why must you troll and snip all over the Internet, anyway? God! You're such an idiot. If you are going to cry every time Otis writes some stuff about you on his website, then don't go on his website in the first place. Calling each other idiots isn't going to solve anything. Why don't you act like an adult, Neil? You are about 3 times my age, and you should have 3 times the amount of life experience that I have. So you should know better than me that this sort of petty insulting game won't do much at all. I am not even an adult -- and I am having to explain this basic concept to you. On Jun 14, 1:34 pm, Kisame Hoshigaki <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Why don't you act like an adult, Neil? Just how DO adults act? Do they go around harming innocent children ... like Uncle Otie does ... by prescribing to them without the knowledge of their parents? If so, then I'm good with my current level of maturity. You? Dear Neil Brooks, You keep giving this sort of excuse: There are vulnerable parents and children who come to the internet, and they should know that Otis and his plus lens theory has been disproved. The truth is, you just like seeing your name and your messages out on the internet. You just want to 'look cool' in front of your friends here and say 'haha, I'm clever, everyone look at me'. You just like attention seeking. Here's a wake up call - You are protecting no one. Your ad-hominem attacks against Otis benefit no one. Everyone knows the internet is not a place to seek professional advice. That is common sense. Now stop using this lame excuse. The rest of your messages are very good. In fact they are quite educated and helpful to people. It's just your attacks against Otis that are a bit out of order. On Jun 14, 1:51 pm, Kisame Hoshigaki <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote: How bad IS your Multiple Personality Disorder anyway? On Jun 14, 1:34 pm, Kisame Hoshigaki <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote: > If you are going to cry every time Otis writes some stuff about you on > his website, then don't go on his website in the first place. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I am not even an adult -- and I am having to explain this basic > concept to you. Mr. Hoshigaki, why don't you go to kids' internet forums and play with your own age group? This forum is for, of and by adults. No it's not. Dear Kisame Hoshigaki, This site is for adults -- who act like children. You have shown more maturity of judgment -- than most of them. Otis On Jun 14, 5:11 pm, Kisame Hoshigaki <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote: > No it's not. On Jun 15, 8:13 am, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote: > This site is for adults -- who act like children. > > You have shown more maturity of judgment -- than most of them. Being supported by Uncle Otie, ISTM, is the ultimate in insults. He got you good. > On Jun 15, 8:13 am, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > He got you good. Ouch. That one really hurt. > >From his personal soapbox: > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > God! You're such an idiot. Here is another one, now buried in the "Cause and Effect" thread. Otis wrote: <<<< For the majority-opinion ODs, ANY PERSON who objects to the over-prescribed minus lens (and stair-case myopia to follow), is AUTOMATICALLY CLASSED AS A "Bates person". >>>> Who is advocating over-prescription of the minus lens? Any OD that I know would object to over-prescription and advocate the correct and proper prescription for the myopic eye. No myope would feel good using lenses stronger than needed. What the hell are you talking about Otis? Is this what Otis' plus theory is based on? Is Neil right calling him idiot? > > >From his personal soapbox: > [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > Is this what Otis' plus theory is based on? Is Neil right calling him > idiot? That's rhetorical, right? Otis wrote: <<<< For the majority-opinion ODs, ANY PERSON who objects to the over-prescribed minus lens (and stair-case myopia to follow), is AUTOMATICALLY CLASSED AS A "Bates person". >>>> "Who is advocating over-prescription of the minus lens? Any OD that I know would object to over-prescription and advocate the correct and proper prescription for the myopic eye. No myope would feel good using lenses stronger than needed. What the hell are you talking about Otis? " You seem a little confused here, Brainy. Otis was referring to the current high frequency of a minus lens being prescribed by the majority-opinion ODs; not its Rx. "Is Neil right calling him idiot?" No. Neil Brooks is not right (in more ways than one). As my friend here has stated, calling each other idiots will not accomplish very much at all. Now please, dear Neil, stop your whining. Either that, or perhaps you could try the kill-file. I'm told it's quite cozy in there. On Jun 15, 2:19 am, Kisame Hoshigaki <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote: > You seem a little confused here, Brainy. Otis was referring to the > current high frequency of a minus lens being prescribed by the > majority-opinion ODs; not its Rx. a) You're wrong. Go look at his 10,000 posts. You'll see. b) Even if you WERE right, the implication is that more minus is being prescribed than is necessary, so ... you're STILL wrong. On 14 Jun, 19:11, Neil Brooks <neil0...@yahoo.com> wrote: Wrong as always, Señor DoucheBag. Dr. Granet knows nothing of the at- home methods that I use. Are you EVER right? Ever?? Can you even SPELL "ophthalmologist?" Do you know the meaning of the word? God! You're such an idiot. "Is Neil right calling him idiot?" No. Neil Brooks is not right (in more ways than one). As my friend here has stated, calling each other idiots will not accomplish very much at all. Now please, dear Neil, stop your whining. Either that, or perhaps you could try the kill-file. I'm told it's quite cozy in there. What are these Japanese-named, fantasy-gamer, cartoon characters that you so admire as to hide behind them as pseudonyms: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akatsuki_(Naruto) I'm glad you live in the fantasy world most of the time. It makes it easier to understand how that translates so readily into support for Uncle Otie. > What are these Japanese-named, fantasy-gamer, cartoon characters that > you so admire as to hide behind them as pseudonyms: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > easier to understand how that translates so readily into support for > Uncle Otie. It's called an avatar, Señor DoucheBag. > > What are these Japanese-named, fantasy-gamer, cartoon characters that > > you so admire as to hide behind them as pseudonyms: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > It's called an avatar, Se?or DoucheBag. It's called the fantasy game from which all of your pseudonyms are taken. It must be an awfully important component in your life for you to choose solely from this well. I happen to like science, reality, rational thought, and honesty. But that's just me. I hope your characters improve their vision by following the dictates of Uncle Otie, and that ... whoever you are, in reality ... you're not hurt by his advice. Your brilliance, incidentally, in co-opting my pithy phrases, is staggering. Good show! Calm down, dear Neil. It was not necessary for you to get an erection over my avatar. Now, I'm sure your girlfriend Brainy will enjoy listening to your lectures with the greatest of attentiveness, but I, on the other hand, don't really need to listen to your moaning. Calm down, dear old chap Neil. It was not necessary for you to get an erection over my avatar. Now, I'm sure your girlfriend Brainy will enjoy listening to your lectures with the greatest of attentiveness, but I, unfortunately, don't really need to listen to your moaning. Thanks ;) > Calm down, dear old chap Neil. It was not necessary for you to get an > erection over my avatar. Now, I'm sure your girlfriend Brainy will > enjoy listening to your lectures with the greatest of attentiveness, > but I, unfortunately, don't really need to listen to your moaning. > Thanks ;) Could you at least extend the courtesy of posting under one name? It makes the kill file easier to manage.  SignatureScott Reverse name to reply > > Calm down, dear old chap Neil. It was not necessary for you to get an > > erection over my avatar. Now, I'm sure your girlfriend Brainy will [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Scott > Reverse name to reply Could you at least extend the courtesy of realizing that I couldn't care less about your management problems? > Could you at least extend the courtesy of realizing that I couldn't > care less about your management problems? Maybe instead of being a Fundamentalist Bates Disciple, you should browse a copy of: http://tinyurl.com/66xwd instead. I would, if you'd stop putting your links in tinyurl form. [snipped absolutely nothing] > Could you at least extend the courtesy of posting under one name? It makes > the kill file easier to manage. ObComputerStuff: Whathisname uses the same Email address about 90% of the time. I can killfile on part of an author, so I do that. > > > What are these Japanese-named, fantasy-gamer, cartoon characters that > > > you so admire as to hide behind them as pseudonyms: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > Your brilliance, incidentally, in co-opting my pithy phrases, is > staggering. Good show! Calm down, dear old chap Neil. It was not necessary for you to get an erection over my avatar. Now, I'm sure your girlfriend Brainy will enjoy listening to your lectures with the greatest of attentiveness, but I, unfortunately, don't really need to listen to your moaning. Thanks ;) > Calm down, dear old chap Neil. It was not necessary for you to get an > erection over my avatar. Can I expect another lesson on maturity soon? |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.