Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / June 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cause and Effect

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
William Horatio Bates - 12 Jun 2007 13:09 GMT
Mike T,

I am interested in a statement you made earlier -

"Bad vision causes strain. Strain doesn't cause bad vision."

How do you measure that?
spammer - 13 Jun 2007 00:41 GMT
On Jun 12, 8:09 am, William Horatio Bates <Kyazek...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> Mike T,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> How do you measure that?

  On the Richter scale, about 6.9
otisbrown@pa.net - 13 Jun 2007 01:57 GMT
Dear Dr. W. H. Bates,

Since you were kicked out of a medical school for
your expressed opinion, (by your book), the
majority-opinion people here consider you discredited.

I doubt that you will get an intelligent response.

Otis

On Jun 12, 8:09 am, William Horatio Bates <Kyazek...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> Mike T,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> How do you measure that?
Neil Brooks - 13 Jun 2007 02:08 GMT
On Jun 12, 5:57 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
> Dear Dr. W. H. Bates,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Otis

Now this is getting downright frightening.

Since Uncle Otie HAS NO demonstrated sense of humor, that leads one to
conclude that he genuinely doesn't realize that Bates is ... uh ...
dead.

Has been since 1931.
Neil Brooks - 13 Jun 2007 02:09 GMT
> On Jun 12, 5:57 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Has been since 1931.

Just to get the Google message ID out there ... for when he ... uh ...
realizes his mistake and erases the post:

1181696269.269435.79680@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com

It'll still appear on other groups that pull from Usenet.
otisbrown@pa.net - 13 Jun 2007 03:11 GMT
Here is what happens to ANY medical person who
"objects" to the grinding majority-opinion that
a negative refractive STATE of the fundamental
eye can not be PREVENTED.

Bates>     Between 1886 and 1891 I was a lecturer at the Post Graduate
Hospital and Medical School.  The head of the institution was Dr.
D.  B. St.  John Roosa.  He was the author of many books, and was
honored and respected by the whole medical profession.  At the
school they had got the habit of putting glasses on the
nearsighted doctors, and I had got the habit of curing them
without glasses.  It was naturally annoying to a man who had put
glasses on a student to have him appear at a lecture without them
and say that Dr.  Bates had cured him.  Dr.  Roosa found it
particularly annoying, and the trouble reached a climax one
evening at the annual banquet of the faculty when, in the presence
of one hundred and fifty doctors, he suddenly poured out the vials
of his wrath upon-my head.

    He said that I was injuring the reputation of the Post
Graduate by claiming to cure myopia.  Every one knew that Donders
said it was incurable, and I had no right to claim that I knew
more than Donders.  I reminded him that some of the men I had
cured had been fitted with glasses by himself.  He replied that if
he had said they had myopia he had made a mistake.  I suggested
further investigation.    "Fit some more doctors with glasses for
myopia," I said, "and I will cure them.  It is easy for you to
examine them afterwards and see if the cure is genuine." This
method did not appeal to him, however.  He repeated that it was
impossible to cure myopia, and to prove that it was impossible he
expelled me from the Post Graduate, even the privilege of
resignation being denied to me.

    The fact is that, except in rare cases, man is not a
reasoning being.  He is dominated by authority, and when the facts
are not in accord with the view imposed by authority, so much the
worse for the facts.  They may, and indeed must, win in the long
run; but in the meantime the world gropes needlessly in darkness
and endures much suffering that might have been avoided.

Dr. W. H. B.

Moral of this story in two parts:

1.  You can never "win".

2.  Read #1

Otis

On Jun 12, 8:57 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
> Dear Dr. W. H. Bates,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Neil Brooks - 13 Jun 2007 03:19 GMT
On Jun 12, 7:11 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
> Here is what happens to ANY medical person who
> "objects" to the grinding majority-opinion that
> a negative refractive STATE of the fundamental
> eye can not be PREVENTED.

[snip]

So ... ARE you aware that he's dead -- long dead??

And ... is it just a coincidence that WH Bates seemed to have suffered
from mental illness, too? [1]

Do you feel like he was a kindred spirit to you, Uncle Otie?

[1] http://www.i-see.org/bates_obit.html
Ms.Brainy - 13 Jun 2007 03:45 GMT
> On Jun 12, 7:11 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> [1]http://www.i-see.org/bates_obit.html

So that you'll know:  Otis will come again and again and will never
give up.  Like Bates and Kepler he's got what it takes to be an
original and genuine great prophet, who never gets tired of telling
the truth.  For the truth he speaks he will repeatedly cut, copy and
paste the same prophecy and will not get discouraged by the fact that
nobody listens.  You can ridicule him, but he will bounce back.  This
is the power of greatness!

Ms. Brainy
Defendant for Otis
and
All Dead Great Men
v.
First Opinioners
and
The Medical Establishment
otisbrown@pa.net - 13 Jun 2007 16:16 GMT
Dear Ms Brainy,

This is the "problem" that any scientist, medical doctor,
or optometrist will have:

There is nothing more difficult to take in hand,
more perilous to contuct,
or more uncertain in its success,
than to take the lead in the
introduction of a new order of things.

Niccolo Machiavelli: The Prince

Enjoy,

Otis

> > On Jun 12, 7:11 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Neil Brooks - 13 Jun 2007 16:25 GMT
On Jun 13, 8:16 am, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
> Dear Ms Brainy,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Niccolo Machiavelli: The Prince

Aphorisms that seem relevant to Uncle Otie:

# A few clowns short of a circus
# The wheel is spinning, but the hamster's dead
# Got a screw loose
# Nutty as a fruit cake
# Bats in the belfry
# Chink in one's armour
# Lost the plot
# Out to Lunch
# Not on the ball
# Odd ball
# Loopy
# Potty
# Doolally
# Mad as a hatter
# As sharp as a marble
# Suffering from a marble deficiency
# There's a rip in his marble's bag
# Losing your marbles
# Basket case
# Mad as a monkey on a trike
# Not firing on all cylinders
# A kangaroo loose in the top paddock
# Hasn't got both hands on the steering wheel
# Hasn't got both oars in the water
# One wave short of a shipwreck
# A few bricks short of a load
# One scout short of a posse
# One card short of a full deck
# An olive short of a pizza
# A sandwich short of a picnic
# A sausage short of a barbecue
# Four quarters short of a dollar
# Ten pence short of a pound
# Five cans short of a six-pack
# A tinny short of a six-pack (australian version)
# A few french fries short of a happy meal
# One putt short of a par
# He or she is living in cloud cuckoo land (nine)
# If I gave a penny for his/her thoughts I'd get change back
# Not the brightest bulb on the tree
# Not the sharpest tool in the box (shed)
# About as bright as a burnt out lightbulb
# There are no phones on planet Pluto
# Wired up to the moon
# A few slates missing from the roof
# A tile (screw) loose
# Not quite the full shilling (ticket)
# Driving on only three wheels
# Knitting with only one needle
# The lift doesn't go all the way to the top
# The lights are on (the door is open) but there's no one at home
Neil Crooks - 13 Jun 2007 16:29 GMT
Aphorisms that seem relevant to myself:

# A few clowns short of a circus
# The wheel is spinning, but the hamster's dead
# Got a screw loose
# Nutty as a fruit cake
# Bats in the belfry
# Chink in one's armour
# Lost the plot
# Out to Lunch
# Not on the ball
# Odd ball
# Loopy
# Potty
# Doolally
# Mad as a hatter
# As sharp as a marble
# Suffering from a marble deficiency
# There's a rip in his marble's bag
# Losing your marbles
# Basket case
# Mad as a monkey on a trike
# Not firing on all cylinders
# A kangaroo loose in the top paddock
# Hasn't got both hands on the steering wheel
# Hasn't got both oars in the water
# One wave short of a shipwreck
# A few bricks short of a load
# One scout short of a posse
# One card short of a full deck
# An olive short of a pizza
# A sandwich short of a picnic
# A sausage short of a barbecue
# Four quarters short of a dollar
# Ten pence short of a pound
# Five cans short of a six-pack
# A tinny short of a six-pack (australian version)
# A few french fries short of a happy meal
# One putt short of a par
# He or she is living in cloud cuckoo land (nine)
# If I gave a penny for his/her thoughts I'd get change back
# Not the brightest bulb on the tree
# Not the sharpest tool in the box (shed)
# About as bright as a burnt out lightbulb
# There are no phones on planet Pluto
# Wired up to the moon
# A few slates missing from the roof
# A tile (screw) loose
# Not quite the full shilling (ticket)
# Driving on only three wheels
# Knitting with only one needle
# The lift doesn't go all the way to the top
# The lights are on (the door is open) but there's no one at home
Neil Brooks - 13 Jun 2007 16:49 GMT
On Jun 13, 8:29 am, Neil Crooks <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

If it's at all within your capability, you really OUGHT to find a way
to come up with something better than the functional equivalent of "I
know you are, but what am I?"

Otherwise, please put one of your (even less mature) siblings back on
the keyboard.  At least they have an excuse....
Neil Crooks - 13 Jun 2007 16:59 GMT
>If it's at all within your capability,

I shall assure myself: It's not.
Dan Abel - 13 Jun 2007 19:27 GMT
> # Not the sharpest tool in the box (shed)
> # About as bright as a burnt out lightbulb

Along the same lines:

Not the sharpest knife in the block.
Nicolaas Hawkins - 13 Jun 2007 03:50 GMT
> On Jun 12, 7:11 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
>> Here is what happens to ANY medical person who
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> [1] http://www.i-see.org/bates_obit.html

Did it occur to you that it is not Brown posting but a clever
impersonator?

Signature

Nicolaas.

2007 Pricelessware CD now available.  600Mb of the best of the best in
Freeware.  E-Mail me for details.

... Losing your temper doesn't get rid of it.

Neil Brooks - 13 Jun 2007 03:55 GMT
> Did it occur to you that it is not Brown posting but a clever
> impersonator?

Yes, but ... you can verify for yourself: It's lovable, old Uncle Otie.
Nicolaas Hawkins - 13 Jun 2007 05:13 GMT
>> Did it occur to you that it is not Brown posting but a clever
>> impersonator?
>
> Yes, but ... you can verify for yourself: It's lovable, old Uncle Otie.

I really don't care about him enough to be bothered, Neil, being on the
other side of the world -- but I really did think that any attempt at wit,
however weak, was right out of character.

Signature

Nicolaas.

2007 Pricelessware CD now available.  600Mb of the best of the best in
Freeware.  E-Mail me for details.

... If you are on the cutting edge, you are holding the knife the wrong
way

Neil Brooks - 13 Jun 2007 05:40 GMT
> I really don't care about him enough to be bothered, Neil, being on the
> other side of the world

I think I'm fond of you, Nicholaas ;-)
Nicolaas Hawkins - 13 Jun 2007 07:44 GMT
>> I really don't care about him enough to be bothered, Neil, being on the
>> other side of the world
>
> I think I'm fond of you, Nicholaas ;-)

<Hmmmm>
:-)

Signature

Nicolaas.

2007 Pricelessware CD now available.  600Mb of the best of the best in
Freeware.  E-Mail me for details.

... A good pun is its own reword.

Kisame Hoshigaki - 14 Jun 2007 17:23 GMT
> On Jun 12, 7:11 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> [1]http://www.i-see.org/bates_obit.html

Dear Neil Brooks,

Subject: My respect for Dr. Bates

Bates did not suffer from "aphasia".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Bates#Bates.27_mental_health

The true story of Dr. Bates' life and work is yet to be told. It is a
life that has all the makings of a NYT bestseller. Where and when did
he successfully self-treat his own presbyopia? Was his marital
situation and family as unsupportive of his work as were the
ophthalmologists? Newspaper accounts of his "disappearances" are
speculative and sensationalized. He was obviously a person of interest
to the general public, yet he chose to remove himself to North Dakota,
where his most remarkable research in treating eyesight of children
was conducted. He was a member of Atlantic Lodge of Ancient Free and
Accepted Mason. There is no evidence of mental illness. I do not think
this remarkable man and scientist ever was or "went crazy".

http://www.iblindness.org/forum/index.php/topic,540.msg2508.html#msg2508
Kisame Hoshigaki - 14 Jun 2007 17:35 GMT
Dear Neil Brooks,

Subject: A "biography" of Bates.

This is a particularly "well-written" biography -

Brief Biography of W.H. Bates, MD

The National Cyclopaedia of American Biography, vol 24, pp. 383-4.

BATES, William Horatio, physician, was born in Newark, N.J., Dec. 23,
1860, the son of Charles and Amelia (Halsey) Bates. He was graduated
A.B. at Cornell university in 1881 and received his medical degree at
the college of physicians and surgeons in 1885. Establishing a
practice in New York city, he served for a time as clinical assistant
at the Manhattan Eye and Ear hospital and was attending physician at
Bellevue hospital, 1886-88, the New York Eye infirmary, the Northern
dispensary and the Northeastern dispensary, 1886-98.

He was an instructor in ophthalmology at the New York Post-Graduate
medical school and hospital, 1886-91. In his professional work Bates
at first devoted his attention to the various organs of the head but
finally restricted himself to the eye alone. He resigned his hospital
appointments in 1896 and for several years engaged in experimental
work. After practicing for several years at Grand Forks,
North.Dakota., he returned to New York and was attending physician at
the Harlem hospital during 1907-22.

In his researches Bates proved exerimentally that the normal fixation
of the eye is central, but never stationary, and the technique
developed by him for treating imperfect eye sight without the use of
glasses was based on this principle. This technique was the practical
application of the psychological theory of the field of consciousness,
which is predicated as a point of focus, the so-called point of
apperception, surrounded by a field of increasing vagueness.

His method was to develop central fixation by training the patient in
the dual art of relaxing and focusing the eyes. While carrying on his
experiments he developed a method of photographing the eye to reveal
changes in surface curvature as the eye functioned. The work is
discussed in "A Study of Images Reflected from the Cornea, Iris, Lens,
and Sclera" (N.Y. Med. Jour., May 18, 1918).

His researches on the influence of memory upon the function of vision
are described in "Memory as an Aid to Vision" (N.Y.Med. Jour., May 24,
1919). In 1894, while seeking to determine the therapeutic effect on
the eye of the active principles of the ductless glands, he discovered
the stringent and hemostatic properties of the aqueous extract of the
suprarenal capsule, later commercialized as adrenalin.

In 1896 he announced this discovery in a paper read before the New
York Academy of Medicine. He introduced a new operation for the relief
of persistent deafness in 1886, consisting of puncturing or incising
the ear drum membrane.

He published a book, "Perfect Eyesight Without Glasses" (1919), which
he had to issue at his own expense, expounding his theories which were
for the most part contrary to established ophthalmological practice.
He also wrote articles describing his methods. He was a member of the
New York State Medical Society and was affiliated with the Dutch
Reformed church. He was fond of sports, especially of tennis in which
he won several awards and while living in North Dakota was state
champion. He was an excellent runner and at the advanced age of fifty-
eight was still able to win a prize.

Bates was a quiet, modest man, a serious student of literature and
astronomy, with a fondness for children. He was married three times:
(1) in 1883, to Edith Kitchell of New York city, by whom he had one
son, Halsey Bates; she died in 1886; (2) to Margaret Crawford, who
died in 1927, leaving two children, William Crawford, and Milo Bates,
wife of Charles McComb; and (3) Aug. 9, 1928, to Mrs. Emily (Ackerman)
Lierman, daughter of Robert Ackerman, of Newark, N.J. Bates died in
New York city, July 10, 1931.

- http://www.vision-training.com/Bates/Biography.htm

KH
Neil Brooks - 14 Jun 2007 18:44 GMT
I guess I could believe you, but--for whatever reason (it'll come to
you)--I'll go with what I saw in the New York Times.

Crazy is as crazy does.  If then were now, he'd be living the quiet
life at Camp Happy, sharing a room with Uncle Otie:

from: http://www.i-see.org/bates_obit.html

New York Times, July 11, 1931, p. 13, col 1.
DR. W. H. BATES DIES; AN EYE SPECIALIST

   Victim, Many Years Ago of a Strange Form of Aphasia, He
Disappeared Twice.

   DISCOVERED VALUED DRUG

   Added Suprarenal to Field of Optic Surgery -- Wrote Book, "Perfect
Sight Without Glasses."

Dr. William H. Bates, a specialist in diseases of the eye, died
yesterday, after a year's illness, at his residence, 210 Madison
Avenue. He is survived by a widow, the former Mrs. Emily Ackerman
Lierman, who had been his assistant and partner in experiment al
research for seventeen years before their marriage in August 1928, and
by a son of the first of two earlier marriages. Dr. Bates was twice a
widower.

The death of Dr. Bates recalls some years ago of his two strange
disappearances, which medical men regarded as among the most
remarkable instances of aphasia [sic] or loss of memory. In 1902,
seven years after his graduation from the College of Physicians and
Surgeons, when he was making his way rapidly in his profession and was
at work on an important medical book, he vanished from the sight and
knowledge of his friends. The day that he was last seen, on Aug. 30,
he had written an affectionate, characteristic letter to his wife, who
was then visiting her mother in Newport, and had sent her books and
instruments from his apartment in the Lonsdale, 567 Madison Avenue.

When he failed to return to the apartment for several days the janitor
informed Mrs. Bates, his second wife, who hurried to the city and
began the search for her husband. Six weeks later she learned that he
was working as an assistant in the Charing Cross Hospital, London, to
which he had been taken as a patient. Mrs. Bates went to London, where
she found her husband in an exhausted, nervous state, with no
recollection of recent events. She took him to the Savoy Hotel, where
he rested for two days and then disappeared again.

Mrs. Bates sought her husband on the Continent and in this country in
vain, tracing every clue that reached her. She died before he was
heard of again. How he was discovered and induced to return to New
York and resume his practice has never been revealed in detail.
According to the best version, a fellow-oculist, Dr. J. E. Kelly,
found Dr. Bates, by accident in 1910, practicing in Grand Forks, N.D.
A few months later the two men occupied offices together in this city,
and thereafter Dr. Bates worked as hard and as successfully as he had
done before his original disappearance.

The theories and methods of eye treatment used by Dr. Bates did not
always accord with those of the majority of eye specialists. He was
the originator of a method of treating imperfect eyesight by mental
relaxation. He discovered the drug suprarenal, which has been called
almost as valuable as cocaine in optic surgery. The best known of his
books is "Perfect Sight Without Glasses."
Kisame Hoshigaki - 14 Jun 2007 19:19 GMT
Dear Neil Brooks,

Subject: A "biography" of Bates.

This is a particularly "well-written" biography -

Brief Biography of W.H. Bates, MD

The National Cyclopaedia of American Biography, vol 24, pp. 383-4.

BATES, William Horatio, physician, was born in Newark, N.J., Dec. 23,
1860, the son of Charles and Amelia (Halsey) Bates. He was graduated
A.B. at Cornell university in 1881 and received his medical degree at
the college of physicians and surgeons in 1885. Establishing a
practice in New York city, he served for a time as clinical assistant
at the Manhattan Eye and Ear hospital and was attending physician at
Bellevue hospital, 1886-88, the New York Eye infirmary, the Northern
dispensary and the Northeastern dispensary, 1886-98.

He was an instructor in ophthalmology at the New York Post-Graduate
medical school and hospital, 1886-91. In his professional work Bates
at first devoted his attention to the various organs of the head but
finally restricted himself to the eye alone. He resigned his hospital
appointments in 1896 and for several years engaged in experimental
work. After practicing for several years at Grand Forks,
North.Dakota., he returned to New York and was attending physician at
the Harlem hospital during 1907-22.

In his researches Bates proved exerimentally that the normal fixation
of the eye is central, but never stationary, and the technique
developed by him for treating imperfect eye sight without the use of
glasses was based on this principle. This technique was the practical
application of the psychological theory of the field of consciousness,
which is predicated as a point of focus, the so-called point of
apperception, surrounded by a field of increasing vagueness.

His method was to develop central fixation by training the patient in
the dual art of relaxing and focusing the eyes. While carrying on his
experiments he developed a method of photographing the eye to reveal
changes in surface curvature as the eye functioned. The work is
discussed in "A Study of Images Reflected from the Cornea, Iris, Lens,
and Sclera" (N.Y. Med. Jour., May 18, 1918).

His researches on the influence of memory upon the function of vision
are described in "Memory as an Aid to Vision" (N.Y.Med. Jour., May 24,
1919). In 1894, while seeking to determine the therapeutic effect on
the eye of the active principles of the ductless glands, he discovered
the stringent and hemostatic properties of the aqueous extract of the
suprarenal capsule, later commercialized as adrenalin.

In 1896 he announced this discovery in a paper read before the New
York Academy of Medicine. He introduced a new operation for the relief
of persistent deafness in 1886, consisting of puncturing or incising
the ear drum membrane.

He published a book, "Perfect Eyesight Without Glasses" (1919), which
he had to issue at his own expense, expounding his theories which were
for the most part contrary to established ophthalmological practice.
He also wrote articles describing his methods. He was a member of the
New York State Medical Society and was affiliated with the Dutch
Reformed church. He was fond of sports, especially of tennis in which
he won several awards and while living in North Dakota was state
champion. He was an excellent runner and at the advanced age of fifty-
eight was still able to win a prize.

Bates was a quiet, modest man, a serious student of literature and
astronomy, with a fondness for children. He was married three times:
(1) in 1883, to Edith Kitchell of New York city, by whom he had one
son, Halsey Bates; she died in 1886; (2) to Margaret Crawford, who
died in 1927, leaving two children, William Crawford, and Milo Bates,
wife of Charles McComb; and (3) Aug. 9, 1928, to Mrs. Emily (Ackerman)
Lierman, daughter of Robert Ackerman, of Newark, N.J. Bates died in
New York city, July 10, 1931.

- http://www.vision-training.com/Bates/Biography.htm

KH
Kisame Hoshigaki - 14 Jun 2007 19:23 GMT
Dear Neil Brooks,

Subject: A "biography" of Bates.

This is a particularly "well-written" biography -

Brief Biography of W.H. Bates, MD

The National Cyclopaedia of American Biography, vol 24, pp. 383-4.

BATES, William Horatio, physician, was born in Newark, N.J., Dec. 23,
1860, the son of Charles and Amelia (Halsey) Bates. He was graduated
A.B. at Cornell university in 1881 and received his medical degree at
the college of physicians and surgeons in 1885. Establishing a
practice in New York city, he served for a time as clinical assistant
at the Manhattan Eye and Ear hospital and was attending physician at
Bellevue hospital, 1886-88, the New York Eye infirmary, the Northern
dispensary and the Northeastern dispensary, 1886-98.

He was an instructor in ophthalmology at the New York Post-Graduate
medical school and hospital, 1886-91. In his professional work Bates
at first devoted his attention to the various organs of the head but
finally restricted himself to the eye alone. He resigned his hospital
appointments in 1896 and for several years engaged in experimental
work. After practicing for several years at Grand Forks,
North.Dakota., he returned to New York and was attending physician at
the Harlem hospital during 1907-22.

In his researches Bates proved exerimentally that the normal fixation
of the eye is central, but never stationary, and the technique
developed by him for treating imperfect eye sight without the use of
glasses was based on this principle. This technique was the practical
application of the psychological theory of the field of consciousness,
which is predicated as a point of focus, the so-called point of
apperception, surrounded by a field of increasing vagueness.

His method was to develop central fixation by training the patient in
the dual art of relaxing and focusing the eyes. While carrying on his
experiments he developed a method of photographing the eye to reveal
changes in surface curvature as the eye functioned. The work is
discussed in "A Study of Images Reflected from the Cornea, Iris, Lens,
and Sclera" (N.Y. Med. Jour., May 18, 1918).

His researches on the influence of memory upon the function of vision
are described in "Memory as an Aid to Vision" (N.Y.Med. Jour., May 24,
1919). In 1894, while seeking to determine the therapeutic effect on
the eye of the active principles of the ductless glands, he discovered
the stringent and hemostatic properties of the aqueous extract of the
suprarenal capsule, later commercialized as adrenalin.

In 1896 he announced this discovery in a paper read before the New
York Academy of Medicine. He introduced a new operation for the relief
of persistent deafness in 1886, consisting of puncturing or incising
the ear drum membrane.

He published a book, "Perfect Eyesight Without Glasses" (1919), which
he had to issue at his own expense, expounding his theories which were
for the most part contrary to established ophthalmological practice.
He also wrote articles describing his methods. He was a member of the
New York State Medical Society and was affiliated with the Dutch
Reformed church. He was fond of sports, especially of tennis in which
he won several awards and while living in North Dakota was state
champion. He was an excellent runner and at the advanced age of fifty-
eight was still able to win a prize.

Bates was a quiet, modest man, a serious student of literature and
astronomy, with a fondness for children. He was married three times:
(1) in 1883, to Edith Kitchell of New York city, by whom he had one
son, Halsey Bates; she died in 1886; (2) to Margaret Crawford, who
died in 1927, leaving two children, William Crawford, and Milo Bates,
wife of Charles McComb; and (3) Aug. 9, 1928, to Mrs. Emily (Ackerman)
Lierman, daughter of Robert Ackerman, of Newark, N.J. Bates died in
New York city, July 10, 1931.

- http://www.vision-training.com/Bates/Biography.htm

KH
otisbrown@pa.net - 15 Jun 2007 03:31 GMT
Dear Kisame Hoshigaki,

Sci.med.vision is of course AGAINST BATES, and
any and all PREVENTIVE methods.

But people like Dr. Jacob Liberman Ph.D.,
advocate and support Bates.  See:

http://www.exerciseyoureyes.com/

He has a good book on the subject.

He has cleared the visiohn of OTHER OPTOMETRISTS
by his method.

Best,

Otis

On Jun 14, 2:23 pm, Kisame Hoshigaki
<absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Neil Brooks,
>
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
>
> KH
Neil Brooks - 15 Jun 2007 04:36 GMT
On Jun 14, 7:31 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
> Dear Kisame Hoshigaki,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> He has a good book on the subject.

Sure he does.  You sell books.  Fred Deakins sells books.  Steve Leung
sells books.

All of you, though, are at least myopic.  Some of you are highly
myopic.  One of you even "guinea pigged" his niece ... who wound up a
myope with a restricted driver's license.

What's that say?
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 15 Jun 2007 05:12 GMT
On Jun 14, 10:31 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
> Dear Kisame Hoshigaki,
>
> Sci.med.vision is of course AGAINST BATES, and
> any and all PREVENTIVE methods.

of course.  we want everyone to get addicted to the wretched minus
lens.  we want to plunge their lives into despair so that they develop
staircase myopia and must return to our offices yearly for stronger
and stronger prescriptions.  this way we make lots of money, and then,
after we are done exploiting our patients, their retinas will detach
and then our ophthalmology co-conspirators will make truck-loads of
money doing the surgery after which they will refer them back to us
for low vision care.

and docs, don't miss the next meeting of the secret society of primary
opinion optometrists (SSPOO) to be held in Monaco in september.  we
will discuss methods to facilitate myopia progression while we dine on
lobster and sip fine wines.  our featured guest speakers at the kick-
off reception will be scooter libby and donald trump.  see you there
fellow docs!
Mike Tyner - 14 Jun 2007 19:36 GMT
> The true story of Dr. Bates' life and work is yet to be told. It is a
> life that has all the makings of a NYT bestseller. Where and when did

I only know Dr. Bates from what he wrote, but that's enough to convince most
readers that his observations aren't very repeatable. From PSWG:

"Only a small part of the phenomena of refractive errors is accounted for by
the inaccuracy of focus"

"The lens is not a factor in accommodation"

"Yet it is to-day a perfectly well-known and undisputed fact that many
persons, after the removal of the lens for cataract, are able to see
perfectly at different distances without any change in their glasses."

"All persons with errors of refraction [have], at frequent intervals,
moments of normal vision when their myopia, hypermetropia, or astigmatism
wholly disappears."

"A sudden exposure to strong light, or rapid or sudden changes of light, are
likely to produce imperfect sight in the normal eye, continuing in some
cases for weeks and months.

"Noise is also a frequent cause of defective vision in the normal eye. All
persons see imperfectly when they hear an unexpected loud noise. Familiar
sounds do not lower the vision, but unfamiliar ones always do."

"Women who wear glasses for minor defects of vision often observe that they
are made more or less color-blind by them."

And my favorite: "Some patients are so responsive to mental suggestion that
you can relieve their discomfort, or improve their sight, with almost any
glasses you like to put on them."

-MT
Ms.Brainy - 14 Jun 2007 20:11 GMT
One of the most comprehensive debunking of the Bates' fallacies can be
found in the following article:  http://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/bates.html
.
Highly recommended!
Kisame Hoshigaki - 14 Jun 2007 21:12 GMT
You know, that website has been debunked itself on many occasions.

In fact, one time I remember them saying something like 'acupuncture
is a load of crap and doesn't do jack $hit'.
Neil Brooks - 14 Jun 2007 21:28 GMT
On Jun 14, 1:12 pm, Kisame Hoshigaki
<absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> You know, that website has been debunked itself on many occasions.
>
> In fact, one time I remember them saying something like 'acupuncture
> is a load of crap and doesn't do jack $hit'.

Despite the fact that you've adopted Uncle Otie's writing .. um ..
"style," the idea of "Proof by Assertion" is rather looked down upon
around these parts.

Here's the article.  A little research wouldn't kill you.

Sadly.

http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/acu.html
Ms.Brainy - 14 Jun 2007 21:39 GMT
> On Jun 14, 1:12 pm, Kisame Hoshigaki
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/acu.html

I wonder where our Japanese friend learned American slang.

And yes, Quackwatch has debunked numerous health/medical frauds and
quackeries, from chiropractice to homeopathy.  The revivalists,
zestues, kazes and their teenage syblings could learn something about
scientific methods and conclusions v. faith and fake.
http://www.quackwatch.org/index.html
otisbrown@pa.net - 15 Jun 2007 03:04 GMT
Subject: Who is ainti-Bates?  Who is against the second-opinion?

For the majority-opinion ODs, ANY  PERSON
who objects to the over-prescribed minus lens
(and stair-case myopia to follow), is
AUTOMATICALLY CLASSED AS A "Bates person".

In evaluating Bate's arguments (scientific and medical),
I think that the majority-opinion medical people
NEVER REVIEW ANY ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC FACTS OR TRUTH.

Bate's deserved a FAIR HEARING.

He never got it.  That is why I developed my
site, and refer to all who OBJECT to the
minus lens, and SEEK better preventive methods,
as second-opinion people.

That is how and why I pay my respects to Dr.
W. H. Bates.

For those who think I am "anti-Bates", I would
ask you to read and understand this
situation clearly.

Best,

Otis

+++++++++++

On Jun 12, 10:11 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
> Here is what happens to ANY medical person who
> "objects" to the grinding majority-opinion that
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 13 Jun 2007 14:46 GMT
On Jun 12, 8:57 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote:
> Dear Dr. W. H. Bates,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> > How do you measure that?

I would like to get your intelligent responses to the questions that i
keep asking you on this forum Otis.  why do you keep ducking and
running anything anyone asks you to back-up what you say?  your
credibility in this forum has gone from zero to negative numbers since
you are unable to support your point-of-view with ANY data on humans,
and unable to explain why all the human data that has been collected
on plus prevention and overminusing clearly shows that the "dynamic
human fundamental eye" (your strange terminology, not mine) DOES NOT
function as you say it does!

furthermore you can't even prove that you are the retired engineer
that you claim to be.

you are like Kaze (=WH Bates, etc. etc.).  just a troll who keeps
coming back over and over again.
no life huh?  sad and pathetic.  just go down to the senior center and
play cards with your friends.
Old_A$$_Brown@pa.net - 13 Jun 2007 16:40 GMT
Dear PClar,

Subject: running ducks

PClar> I would like to get your intelligent responses to the questions
that i keep asking you on this forum Otis.  

OAB> I have little doubt that you would.  I would be amazed
to see that, myself.

PClar> why do you keep ducking and running anything anyone
asks you to back-up what you say?  

OAB> There is more than "adequate" "back-up" on my site:

 www.Believe-Me-Because-I-am-Myopic-As-Hell.com

PClar> your credibility in this forum has gone from zero to negative
numbers since you are unable to support your point-of-view with ANY
data on humans

OAB> You're virtually BEGGING for me to trot out Raphaelson's
"The Printer's Son," now aren't you?

PClar> and unable to explain why all the human data that has been
collected on plus prevention and overminusing clearly shows that the
"dynamic human fundamental eye" (your strange terminology, not mine)
DOES NOT function as you say it does!

OAB> Have I told you that my nephew, Keith Benson, has 20/20
vision?  Why isn't that enough?  His sister, Joy Benson, would
be here to speak for herself, but her myopia prevents her from
functioning in "civil society."

PClar> furthermore you can't even prove that you are the retired
engineer that you claim to be.

OAB> From this we learn that a wise prince sees to it that never, in
order to attack someone, does he become the ally of a prince more
powerful than himself, except when necessity forces him, as I said
above. If you win, you are the powerful king’s prisoner, and wise
princes avoid as much as they can being in other men’s power.

- Niccolo Machiavelli

PClar> you are like Kaze (=WH Bates, etc. etc.).  just a troll who
keeps coming back over and over again.  no life huh?  sad and
pathetic.  just go down to the senior center and
play cards with your friends.

OAB> Putting aside your petty insults for the moment: I
WOULD VERY MUCH like to "go down to the senior center
and play cards with my friends."  Sadly, I am under-minused and
cannot safely leave the house.  Also, those at the senior center
"don't really like me" very much.  They are under the impression
that I talk but do not listen.

Can you "imagine?"

Old_A$$_Brown
En-gun-ear (and out the other)
Mike Tyner - 13 Jun 2007 02:36 GMT
> I am interested in a statement you made earlier -
>
> "Bad vision causes strain. Strain doesn't cause bad vision."
>
> How do you measure that?

In the textbooks they measure it as the incidence of asthenopia.

You would be surprised how often bad vision exists without asthenopia.

-MT
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.