 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Vision / June 2007Otis? Just a pathological liar, huh?
Also seen on Otis's little soapbox forum: [QUOTE]The issue of the natural eye's proven dynamic behavior has always been a "hot" subject in medicine. If you wish to consult with a majority-opinion ophthamoligist contact David Granet at: http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/granet.htm [/QUOTE] What reason could you POSSIBLY have for singling out David Granet? He's an ocular motility/pediatric strabismus ophthalmologist. Are you simply off your meds again?? [QUOTE] Or his patient, Neil Brooks at: http://nbeener.com/ [/QUOTE] What reason could you POSSIBLY have for referring people to MY website? The only page on there about vision is the page of questions that you won't answer. Are you simply off your meds again?? [QUOTE] Both people have posted their judgment that a -3 diopter lens has no effect on the refractive STATE of the natural eye on sci.med.vision.[/QUOTE] Hey, Douchebag! You're the only one who uses this ridiculous terminology. Stop lying. [QUOTE] It is not clear exactly what medical qualifications Mr. Brooks has for making any scientific statement about the natural eye's behavior when experimentally tested.[/QUOTE] Hey, Douchebag! You're the only one who uses this ridiculous terminology. Stop lying. As to my "medical qualifications," I believe I've stated them: I have none. Otis, you're a sick old man. I think it's time you sought some professional help. It's not his fault, he keeps falling down his "staircase" on his head. Neil, you were right and I apologize. Otis is nothing but scumbag and I will work together with you too make sure that everybody are know that he is a lyer. Please you forgive my earlier attitude? This "Revival" is U34484@uwe -- and probably not the original "Revival". > Neil, you were right and I apologize. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > -- > Message posted viahttp://www.medkb.com On Jun 6, 7:38 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote: > This "Revival" is U34484@uwe -- and probably > not the original "Revival". But you ARE a pathological liar (just like "Revival," et al). Care to address THAT? On Jun 6, 10:38 pm, "otisbr...@pa.net" <otisbr...@pa.net> wrote: > This "Revival" is U34484@uwe -- and probably > not the original "Revival". [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > -- > > Message posted viahttp://www.medkb.com Otis, Subject: Myopia prevention with plus lenses Most young hyperopes do not wear any glasses to correct their farsightedness. So they go throughout their entire waking life accommodative excessively. Sometimes, 2,3, or even 4 diopters. This is optically equivalent to a young child holding a book very very close to their eyes. It is the same as taking an emmetropic human, and suturing a -3.00 D lens on their eye all the time so they have no choice but to see through it. Why so, then, don't these hyperopes become more myopic (= less hyperopic)? If what you say about reading distance being a critical factor in myopia development, as well as excessive minus lens prescriptions, then your theory predicts they should lose their hyperopia-- yet the vast majority do not. Can you explain this observation? Because this is a major "chink" in your argument about myopia development. Are you just going to remain silent while the dam bursts around you? Or are you just going to give us another cut and paste repeat of Raphaelson or Sterling Colgate replete with old black-and-white photos. People are watching while your true inability to provide a rational defense of your therapy becomes more and more obvious. Even the laypeople who read this forum notice the buzzards circling. I had no idea that engineers behaved in such a way. Best, p. clarkii RUN AND HIDE, OTIS!! RUN AND HIDE!!! PEOPLE ARE CHALLENGING YOUR FAITH AGAIN!!!! OH, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooo!!! |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.