Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

best-form spheric vs aspheric

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
infoseeker - 22 May 2007 19:18 GMT
I was told by my optician that there would always be a slight benefit
to aspheric lenses.  However, my research seems to indicate that a
true best-form spheric is best.  My question is, If someone has a
prescription filled with a CR-39 lens, would they automatically be
getting a best-form spheric?  If not, how can a person make sure they
are getting a best-form spheric?
Salmon Egg - 23 May 2007 01:20 GMT
On 5/22/07 11:18 AM, in article
1179857932.768082.55450@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com, "infoseeker"
<sheilasc@gmail.com> wrote:

> I was told by my optician that there would always be a slight benefit
> to aspheric lenses.  However, my research seems to indicate that a
> true best-form spheric is best.  My question is, If someone has a
> prescription filled with a CR-39 lens, would they automatically be
> getting a best-form spheric?  If not, how can a person make sure they
> are getting a best-form spheric?

The real question is: Best for what? Lens design is always a trade-off. That
applies even for simple lenses. For example, how much do you value best
resolution looking straight ahead along the axis of your lens compared to
facing straight ahead and pivoting your eyes to see in and off-axis
direction?

Lens designers use some kind of merit function that is a weighted average of
all kinds of performances. Such a merit function is often subjective. With
that merit function, a lens can be designed to maximize it under whatever
fabrication constraints there may be. It is like asking what combination of
spices will give the best taste to chili.

Fortunately, it is usually not necessary to go to such extremes.

Bill
-- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.
infoseeker - 23 May 2007 02:29 GMT
> On 5/22/07 11:18 AM, in article
> 1179857932.768082.55...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com, "infoseeker"
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Bill
> -- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.

The reason I ask is that my mother has macular degeneration.  She can
still see to carry out daily activities, but she is starting to lose
central vision.  I am trying to determine what type of lens will give
her the widest field of clear vision.
Salmon Egg - 23 May 2007 04:23 GMT
On 5/22/07 6:29 PM, in article
1179883756.743107.213850@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com, "infoseeker"
<sheilasc@gmail.com> wrote:

> The reason I ask is that my mother has macular degeneration.  She can
> still see to carry out daily activities, but she is starting to lose
> central vision.  I am trying to determine what type of lens will give
> her the widest field of clear vision.

I am not a health professional, but you do not have to be one to understand
that her problem arises from her retina and not from the optics of her eye
and associated external lenses. It is likely that a health professional
working with macular degeneration may have a few tricks of the trade that
might eke out a bit of performance by fine tuning the optics. I would not
expect much improvement, but you have nothing to lose by asking. Your best
bet might be to use television to give extra magnification of printed pages.

Bill
-- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.
infoseeker - 23 May 2007 02:29 GMT
> On 5/22/07 11:18 AM, in article
> 1179857932.768082.55...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com, "infoseeker"
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Bill
> -- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.

The reason I ask is that my mother has macular degeneration.  She can
still see to carry out daily activities, but she is starting to lose
central vision.  I am trying to determine what type of lens will give
her the widest field of clear vision.
infoseeker - 23 May 2007 02:30 GMT
> On 5/22/07 11:18 AM, in article
> 1179857932.768082.55...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com, "infoseeker"
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Bill
> -- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.

The reason I ask is that my mother has macular degeneration.  She can
still see to carry out daily activities, but she is starting to lose
central vision.  I am trying to determine what type of lens will give
her the widest field of clear vision.
infoseeker - 23 May 2007 02:30 GMT
> On 5/22/07 11:18 AM, in article
> 1179857932.768082.55...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com, "infoseeker"
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Bill
> -- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.

The reason I ask is that my mother has macular degeneration.  She can
still see to carry out daily activities, but she is starting to lose
central vision.  I am trying to determine what type of lens will give
her the widest field of clear vision.
infoseeker - 23 May 2007 02:32 GMT
> On 5/22/07 11:18 AM, in article
> 1179857932.768082.55...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com, "infoseeker"
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Bill
> -- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.

The reason I ask is that my mother has macular degeneration.  She can
still see to carry out daily activities, but she is starting to lose
central vision.  I am trying to determine what type of lens will give
her the widest field of clear vision.
infoseeker - 23 May 2007 03:58 GMT
> On 5/22/07 11:18 AM, in article
> 1179857932.768082.55...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com, "infoseeker"
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Bill
> -- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.

The reason I ask is that my mother has macular degeneration.  She can
still see to carry out daily activities, but she is starting to lose
central vision.  I am trying to determine what type of lens will give
her the widest field of clear vision.
Robert Martellaro - 23 May 2007 20:04 GMT
>I was told by my optician that there would always be a slight benefit
>to aspheric lenses.  However, my research seems to indicate that a
>true best-form spheric is best.

Aspherics should be "best form" also. On and off-axis vision is the same with
both types of lenses as long as they are fit properly.  

>My question is, If someone has a
>prescription filled with a CR-39 lens, would they automatically be
>getting a best-form spheric?  

Only if the lab uses the base curve that the lens manufacturer recommends.

>If not, how can a person make sure they
>are getting a best-form spheric?

Top quality labs will always use the recommended curve. You can get pretty good
idea if the curve is correct by using a lens clock to measure the base curve,
and then check with the lab or lens manufacturer.

>The reason I ask is that my mother has macular degeneration.  She can
>still see to carry out daily activities, but she is starting to lose
>central vision.  I am trying to determine what type of lens will give
>her the widest field of clear vision.

Avoid polycarbonate if the Rx is above three diopters or so, don't use small
frames or frames with wide temples, use segmented multifocals (lines) instead of
progressives, especially if the Add for reading is above +2.75, and see a low
vision specialist.

Robert Martellaro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Optician/Owner
Roberts Optical
Wauwatosa Wi.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself."
- Richard Feynman
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.