I don't have the technical measurement information about my current/
pre surgery vision which may render my questions impossible to answer
but I'm hoping to find others who may share their experiences with me.

Pre-surgery I was very near-sighted with apparenly mild astigmatism
and steep corneas. I have worn glasses for about 45 years and use my
eyes intensively/extensively at all distances, including alot of PC
work and reading on the job as well as for close work hobbies. My work
requires that I view alot of different distances minute by minute
through-out the day.

One month after cataract surgery on my dominant eye I now drive
without my glasses for the first time in my life. I go to lectures and
no longer have to sit in the front seat to view. I am able to see the
alarm clock without my glasses. In fact, I've not used my glasses for
the last 3 weeks at all.

Although I'm EXTREMELY pleased with this distant vision, I am
distressed that my "second sight" cataract-caused vision in my non-
operated-on second eye with cataract is so superior to my near vision
in my dominant, newly implanted ReStor eye. I had considerable
swelling (edema) with my surgery and my recovery seemed to be at least
one week behind most other people's recovery. I really couldn't see
well enough to drive to my job for about 5-6 days. (I still have to
get on my hands and knees to get my eyes close enough to my work to do
my work.)

I realize that my "good" "second sight" in my non-dominant eye will
eventually cease due to increasing cataract growth and then I will be
forced to implant some lens in my second eye.
I hate to let my cataract become more dense as I let the dominant eye
cataract get too dense before surgery BUT I can't see giving up my
presently good near vision in my non-dominant eye yet.

I am assured that with the second ReStor implant my near vision will
be much better and that my vision won't really improve until I do get
the second implant.

I wonder how my near vision can improve with a second ReStor implant
when the near vision in the first eye is so much poorer than my
"second sight" in my non-operated eye. It doesn't make sense that if I
can't see up close now that I would see so much better up close with a
second ReStor implant. How can two negatives make up a positive in my
layman's way of thinking?

When I was researching recovery from cataract surgery, I mainly found
articles referring to a very speedy return to work. Acquaintances who
I polled said they were playing cards that evening after cataract
surgery.

Now I understand that neuroadaptation takes as long as up to a year
before one's new lens and brain learn to see as well as they are going
to. One month isn't very far into that process.

It is difficult for me to just "trust" that my near vision will be
better with a second ReStor. I have no desire to have alot of follow-
surgery to get my near vision back. I have no desire to start wearing
readers/glasses for my nearly constant up-close reading needs when
I've not had to wear glasses for up-close reading for the last 2-3
years.

I have difficulty reading my piano music now through the blur. I can't
read the blurry page of a book 8-10 inches from my eyes without the
aid of my non-implanted/original cataracted eye. If I cover my "bad"
eye, this computer text is blurry. With both eyes in use, the blur is
much less.

I feel like I have traded near-sightedness for far-sightedness now and
I'm not sure I'm happy with the exchange. I realize that no implanted
vision is as good as one's healthy original vision (providing that one
did have original good vision!)

With the relatively early onset of my cataracts, the decisions I make
now on my second implant will likely be what I'll have to live with
the rest of my life (hopefully 30-40 years) as I'm not interested in
any more surgery. I know that surgery outcomes can't be predicted and
that each recovery is different.

Thank you for any insights to my near vision concerns.