Ok, here is one for the you. If you are a Batesian then please don't
reply.
As noted before, my RX is:
Sph Cyl Axis Add
-0.50 -0.25 165 +0.75 OD
plano -0.75 040 +0.75 OS
I have not tried bifocals yet, but do have both distance and
reading glasses made from that RX.
The distance glasses are ok for computer work and even for
reading tho the reading glasses are better for both (of course).
Since a very large percentage of my normal day involves close
vision work, I was wondering how terrible it would be if I used a
single vision pair of glasses using:
Sph Cyl Axis
-0.25 -0.25 165
+0.25 -0.75 040
If I am understanding the optics correctly, then this would be a
slight improvement for close work and would maybe still work well
enough for general distance work.
Is this a silly idea?
Would the be likely to be dangerous for driving?
I know I would want to ask my own O.D. before trying this, but I am
asking *you* right now (if you are not a Bates follower). Note that I
can get a pair like that for $13 to experiment with, so if this is not
silly or dangerous then it could easily be worth the cost of trying a
pair.

Signature
Doug Herr
doug*at*wombatz*dot*com
William Stacy, O.D. - 19 May 2007 20:16 GMT
> If I am understanding the optics correctly, then this would be a
> slight improvement for close work and would maybe still work well
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Would the be likely to be dangerous for driving?
Not silly and not dangerous.
Ms.Brainy - 19 May 2007 20:28 GMT
> > If I am understanding the optics correctly, then this would be a
> > slight improvement for close work and would maybe still work well
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Not silly and not dangerous.
You can be your own judge regarding the sufficiency of your vision.
Doug Herr - 19 May 2007 20:49 GMT
>> > If I am understanding the optics correctly, then this would be a
>> > slight improvement for close work and would maybe still work well
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> You can be your own judge regarding the sufficiency of your vision.
Way cool, thank you both.
Clearly I would not want to hurt my future vision abilities; so if there
was a medical/scientific view that it could do even a little harm, then I
would not consider it (again, no Bates views needed).
With some of the online retailers being as cheap as they are, it affords
the possibility of doing some experimentation that would not seem
worthwhile otherwise.

Signature
Doug Herr
doug*at*wombatz*dot*com
michael toulch - 19 May 2007 21:42 GMT
> Ok, here is one for the you. If you are a Batesian then please don't
> reply.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> Doug Herr
> doug*at*wombatz*dot*com
not a dangerous or bad thing to try, they will probably work exactly
as you expect.