Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tonometers

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
critterfarms@aland.net - 09 May 2007 21:20 GMT
This may be a bit off topic but maybe somebody here can help me. My
older dog was recently diagnosed with acute glaucoma in one eye. He
has probably lost his vision in that eye and it will maybe be removed.
However I do hope we can save his vision in the other eye, but my
veterinarian doesn't have access to a tonometer!

She says they are too expensive and cases with glaucoma too rare.
After asking around, no other vet in my area have a tonometer (I live
on an island) so now I'm thinking about buying one myself. I know they
are expensive, but maybe there is somebody who knows a good place to
buy used or reconditioned tonometers? Preferably it should be air-puff
or otherwise non contact and hand held. Is there a difference in
tonometers for animals and humans?

Please if you know of a good place to buy one, let me know. It pains
me so much if my dog would become totally blind just because we don't
have the right equipment.

Thanks.
Neil Brooks - 09 May 2007 21:37 GMT
On May 9, 1:20 pm, critterfa...@aland.net wrote:
> This may be a bit off topic but maybe somebody here can help me. My
> older dog was recently diagnosed with acute glaucoma in one eye. He
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks.

At the risk of asking seemingly ridiculous questions, have you called
-- begging and pleading -- every HUMAN-seeing optometrist and
ophthalmologist in your area??

I could easily imagine one being a dog lover and having you come by
after hours to check your dog's pressure.

I'm not too sure how different the technique is (fitting a canine face
into a human gizmo), but ... YOU would face the same challenges ...
with less experience ... if you went the route you propose.

Worth a few calls, no?
Don W - 09 May 2007 21:51 GMT
So why are we not Googling "canine tonometers"?

There are a lot of follow up links there.

Don W.
Salmon Egg - 09 May 2007 22:15 GMT
On 5/9/07 1:20 PM, in article
1178742057.602577.243670@e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,

> This may be a bit off topic but maybe somebody here can help me. My
> older dog was recently diagnosed with acute glaucoma in one eye. He
> has probably lost his vision in that eye and it will maybe be removed.
> However I do hope we can save his vision in the other eye, but my
> veterinarian doesn't have access to a tonometer!
<snip>

Get a new life and/or dog.

Bill
Neil Brooks - 09 May 2007 23:52 GMT
> On 5/9/07 1:20 PM, in article
> 1178742057.602577.243...@e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Bill

Hey, Bill:

Here's a link for ya':

http://tinyurl.com/jqh2p

Happy reading,

Neil
Salmon Egg - 10 May 2007 06:42 GMT
On 5/9/07 3:52 PM, in article
1178751175.393394.227830@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com, "Neil Brooks"
<neil0502@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hey, Bill:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Happy reading,

Because of my neighbors, I have little empathy for dog owners.
Finally, they put down the worst barkers because of health problems. They
did not walk them, train them, or pay with them. They leave food out for all
the cats, rats, possums, and pigeons. They have a sh.t lined roof. Just
today, I had to wipe up a big bird plop on my windshield before I could
drive.

I know all dog owners are not the same, but these are the ones that give the
greatest trouble.

Bill
-- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.
Neil Brooks - 10 May 2007 16:01 GMT
> Because of my neighbors, I have little empathy for dog owners.

Because of this, you extrapolated from a sample size of one to the
entire universe of dog owners.  More particularly, you exhibited
callous disregard for somebody pained by watching their dog deal with
late-stage physical problems.

With each successive post, you seem to have more and more in common
with Otis, Bill.

And that's far from a compliment.

Bitch at your neighbors.  Leave people like the OP alone.
spammer - 10 May 2007 17:01 GMT
> > Because of my neighbors, I have little empathy for dog owners.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Bitch at your neighbors.  Leave people like the OP alone.

When that sample size of the universe is on your back every day, his
feelings are understandable.
Neil Brooks - 10 May 2007 17:04 GMT
> > > Because of my neighbors, I have little empathy for dog owners.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> When that sample size of the universe is on your back every day, his
> feelings are understandable.

I have no problem with his feelings.  I have a large problem with his
actions.

Callous, mis-directed anger and insensitivity didn't help Bill, didn't
resolve the neighbor issue, and hadn't a snowball's chance in hell of
doing anything productive for the OP.
spammer - 10 May 2007 17:47 GMT
> I have no problem with his feelings.  I have a large problem with his
> actions.
>
> Callous, mis-directed anger and insensitivity didn't help Bill, didn't
> resolve the neighbor issue, and hadn't a snowball's chance in hell of
> doing anything productive for the OP.

  And so the beauty of an unmoderated group.  :)
Salmon Egg - 10 May 2007 23:35 GMT
On 5/10/07 9:04 AM, in article
1178813072.494833.179790@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com, "Neil Brooks"
<neil0502@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> When that sample size of the universe is on your back every day, his
>> feelings are understandable.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> resolve the neighbor issue, and hadn't a snowball's chance in hell of
> doing anything productive for the OP.

It made me feel better! That is good enough for me.

I realize that poisoning the dogs is futile and that the fault does not lie
with the dogs. Poisoning the neighbors would be more appropriate although
illegal and counterproductive in the long run. :=)

Bill
-- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.
spammer - 11 May 2007 01:01 GMT
> I realize that poisoning the dogs is futile and that the fault does not lie
> with the dogs. Poisoning the neighbors would be more appropriate although
> illegal and counterproductive in the long run. :=)

Yes, neighbor poisoning is illegal in most states, but not
necessarily counterproductive.  :)
Dr Judy - 09 May 2007 23:01 GMT
On May 9, 4:20 pm, critterfa...@aland.net wrote:
> This may be a bit off topic but maybe somebody here can help me. My
> older dog was recently diagnosed with acute glaucoma in one eye. He
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks.

I practice near a Vet training clinic and have talked to the vet eye
docs.  They use old Schiotz type tonometers, calibrated for dog.  They
are available on E-bay and at antique dealers and are affordable.  An
air puff will set you back thousands of dollars and I doubt if you
could convince your dog to sit still long enough to get a reading.

Frankly, you don't need a tonometer to diagnose acute glaucoma and,
from what I understand, chronic open angle glaucoma is rare in dogs.

Also, dogs don't rely on their vision as much as we do; smell is their
primary sensory organ and blind dogs function quite well.

Dr Judy
William Stacy - 10 May 2007 01:23 GMT
>They use old Schiotz type tonometers, calibrated for dog.  They
>are available on E-bay and at antique dealers and are affordable.
>  

I was going to recommend that one.  Somone will have to hold the dog
still with it's eye aimed upward and keep the lids pulled apart for the
second or two the reading takes, and you'll have to get some topical
anesthetic to drop in first.  They're pretty easy to use and accurate
enough for this purpose.  You might even find an old Tonomat around.  
Even easier to use.

w.stacy, o.d.
critterfarms@aland.net - 10 May 2007 06:11 GMT
> >They use old Schiotz type tonometers, calibrated for dog.  They
> >are available on E-bay and at antique dealers and are affordable.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> w.stacy, o.d.

Thank you for your replies. I must clarify that I meant to donate the
instrument to the vet of course. I realise that I can't use it
myself.

I have a breed that is predisposed to glaucoma due to pectin ligament
dysplasia, and from what I've heard it is important to check the other
eye for elevated pressure.

I will try at ebay and see if I can get the old Schiotz type like you
recommended.

Thanks
Salmon Egg - 10 May 2007 06:44 GMT
On 5/9/07 5:23 PM, in article
1Et0i.2235$zj3.1460@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net, "William Stacy"
<wstacy@obase.net> wrote:

>> They use old Schiotz type tonometers, calibrated for dog.  They
>> are available on E-bay and at antique dealers and are affordable.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> w.stacy, o.d.

How skilful can practitioners get in estimating IOP by touch?

Bill
-- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.
Dr Judy - 10 May 2007 14:01 GMT
> On 5/9/07 5:23 PM, in article
> 1Et0i.2235$zj3.1...@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net, "William Stacy"
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> How skilful can practitioners get in estimating IOP by touch?

You can tell the difference between stony hard and mushy soft.

Dr Judy
Anon E. Muss - 11 May 2007 06:42 GMT
>How skilful can practitioners get in estimating IOP by touch?

Some examiners, by comparing palpation after determining the IOP by
another technique, may be able to estimate IOP within 2-3mm.
William Stacy - 11 May 2007 17:00 GMT
I'm hoping that was stated with tongue firmly planted in the buccal
mucosa...

>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>another technique, may be able to estimate IOP within 2-3mm.
>  
Mike Tyner - 11 May 2007 17:18 GMT
To me, they all feel like "18" :)

-MT

 I'm hoping that was stated with tongue firmly planted in the buccal mucosa...

 Anon E. Muss wrote:
 Some examiners, by comparing palpation after determining the IOP by
 another technique, may be able to estimate IOP within 2-3mm.

   
William Stacy - 11 May 2007 17:35 GMT
I've personally never even tried that method of "tonometry", because I
was taught that someone way back when had double blinded the technique
and it was found to be completely useless.

> To me, they all feel like "18" :)
>  
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>      
>      
Neil Brooks - 11 May 2007 18:01 GMT
> I've personally never even tried that method of "tonometry", because I
> was taught that someone way back when had double blinded the technique
> and it was found to be completely useless.

Some mechanics (typical for bicycle mechanics) "don't need to
steenkin' torque wrench" to properly tighten fasteners.

When their "decades of experience" were checked with calibrated
equipment, they were always significantly off--way beyond the
prescribed tolerances.

Trust but verify ;-)
Anon E. Muss - 12 May 2007 06:32 GMT
>>>How skilful can practitioners get in estimating IOP by touch?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I'm hoping that was stated with tongue firmly planted in the buccal
>mucosa...

Uh, no.

=====
"Atlas of Glaucoma -- Second Edition" -- Edited by Neil T
Choplin/Diane C Lundy.  (c) 2007 Informa UK Ltd.

    <http://tinyurl.com/2baorz>

ISBN-10:  1 84184 518 3
ISBN-13:  978 1 84184 518 0
Publication Date:  02/13/2007

Chapter 4 -- "Intraocular pressure and its measurement", p. 30-1,
section entitled "Estimation of Intraocular Pressure by Palpation" --
last sentence:

    [...]

    "If palpation is applied after determining pressure by another
    technique, the examiner may become quite capable of estimating
    intraocular pressure to within 2-3mm."
=====
=====
    <http://tinyurl.com/2bzvl9>

    [...]

    "In fact, it is said that the famous Dr. Claus Dohlman,
    Harvard professor of Ophthalmology at the Massachusetts Eye
    and Ear Infirmary, remains as accurate in measuring IOP with
    his fingers as any ophthalmologist using the high-tech    
    tonometers of today!"
=====
=====
    <http://tinyurl.com/29cnxe>

    [...]

    " P:   This sounds a little strange, but can you tell by
    feeling the eyeball whether pressure is high?  I ask because
    the eyeball that has not had a trabeculectomy feels somewhat
    larger to the touch than the one that had the trab.

    Dr. Wilson:  Yes, with training, you can estimate the IOP by
    finger palpation.

    Moderator:  I try to guess my IOP before I get it taken, and
    I'm usually pretty close.

    [...]
=====
=====
    <http://tinyurl.com/yv7alm>

    [...]

    "Soon afterwards, digital palpation tonometry became an
    essential clinical skill to be mastered by all
    ophthalmologists. When mechanical tonometry was first
    introduced in the late 1800s, many ophthalmologists felt so
    confident with their ability to estimate IOP by palpation that
    they viewed the new technology as inferior. Schnabel, in a
    1908 address to the Vienna Ophthalmological Society, stated
    that although he did not object in principle to mechanical
    tonometry, he expected “…very little from this test since
    digital tonometry by an expert is a much more accurate
    test.”"

    [...]
=====
Anon E. Muss - 11 May 2007 06:47 GMT
>This may be a bit off topic but maybe somebody here can help me. My
>older dog was recently diagnosed with acute glaucoma in one eye. He
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>or otherwise non contact and hand held. Is there a difference in
>tonometers for animals and humans?

First, there are veterinary ophthalmologists -- here's one:

    http://tinyurl.com/ywxnpb

probably only located in large urban areas.

You can also try veterinary schools if there is one relatively close
to you.

A veterinary assistant I spoke to a while ago uses a TonoPen XL.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.