Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Colour Blindness

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
lesliewright8@hotmail.com - 23 Apr 2007 19:40 GMT
After yet again being turnrd down for a job (this time, British
Telecom), I thought I would post here.

I have Protoanomalia (red-green colour blindness), and, athough I am
quite capable of working with electricity, and/electronics, I am not
allowed into the industry.

Some years ago I wrote a short paper detailing, a method of more
accurate diagnosis of Colour Blindness, and a possible cure.
I forwarde the paper to Mrs Jennifer Birch (Senior Lecturer in
Clinical Optometry, at City University, London), and whilst I was
correct, about the more accurate diagnosis, my possible cure wouldnt
have worked, since my knowlege of the dynamics involved was immature.

Shortly after I came up with a new Idea, which is presented on the
following web page, along with some initial experiments and research:

http://www.fineartradiography.com/hobbies/colour/index.html

I would very much like to hear from anyone who has an opinion, or
constructive critisism, on my idea.

Many thanks to everyone that read this

Leslie Wright
michael toulch - 24 Apr 2007 00:34 GMT
On Apr 23, 2:40 pm, lesliewrig...@hotmail.com wrote:
> After yet again being turnrd down for a job (this time, British
> Telecom), I thought I would post here.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Leslie

Why will dyeing an internal eye structure (vitreous) reduce the "3 D"
effect caused by an external (contact) lens?
leslie - 24 Apr 2007 01:35 GMT
> On Apr 23, 2:40 pm, lesliewrig...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Why will dyeing an internal eye structure (vitreous) reduce the "3 D"
> effect caused by an external (contact) lens?

Obviously, you would want to dye both. I should have been clearer in
the explanation!
The point is dyeing the vitreous humour would be a (semi) permanent
solution, that companies like BT could not ignore.
Granted you would probably have to have regular checkups, depending on
the rate of the bodies excretion of the dye, but then you should be
seeng the opthalmolgist on a regular basis anyway.

I do not know, why the ChromaGen lens, only uses one eye (given the
chromatic binocular disparity it creates)
But with the results of the experiments, I feel that this would work
woith both eyes, thus negating that effect, and be an almost permanent
solution.

Leslie
Dr Judy - 24 Apr 2007 04:28 GMT
> > > I have Protoanomalia (red-green colour blindness), and, athough I am
> > > quite capable of working with electricity, and/electronics, I am not
> > > allowed into the industry.

> I do not know, why the ChromaGen lens, only uses one eye (given the
> chromatic binocular disparity it creates)

The Chroma Gens works by "fooling" the plate type tests.  Wearers
still fail on more precise colour vision tests.  Some users of the
lens have found that by comparing the view through the lens with the
view without (ie compare one eye to the other) they are better able to
colour name.  Also the Chroma Gens lens (and your proposed filters)
remove a significant amount of light so things are dim.  Driving at
night with two Chroma Gens would be difficult.

> But with the results of the experiments, I feel that this would work
> woith both eyes, thus negating that effect, and be an almost permanent
> solution.

If you are actually able to do the jobs you have applied for, despite
the colour defect, you may get further by lobbying the employers to
use real world testing instead of relying on colour vision test
plates.  Here in Canada, the railroads, police forces and even pilot
licensing bodies will use real world testing.  For example, railroad
workers take a Lantern Test, which involves shining small, dim,
coloured lights from a distance and testing whether the individual can
identify them.  Pilots are taken to the flight control tower at night
and tested to see if they can identify the ground lights.

Seems if you were applying for electrical engineering, they could have
provided you with the twenty or thirty different coloured wires used
in electronics and tested whether you could identify them and not
confuse any two.

Dr Judy
leslie - 24 Apr 2007 13:28 GMT
> > > > I have Protoanomalia (red-green colour blindness), and, athough I am
> > > > quite capable of working with electricity, and/electronics, I am not
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Dr Judy

I have tried on several occasions arguing my case with these people,
but it seem somewhere in the manual of theirs, it says Colour
Blindness=no job!
I managed to convince the local college lecturer to give me a real
world test, an whilst I passed it, I was informed that the Law states
that you are not allowed to enter the industry as you are colour
blind.
There is a local Election coming up, so I am going to put my case
across to the candidates, and vote for the one, who offers to take it
further.

Mr Harris`s ChromaGen lens, did indeed remove a significant portion of
the available light, and did cause innacuracies in colour perception,
whilst being able to fool the Ishahara test. However, I feel that with
more accurate measuring of the degree of colour vision deficiency, and
dyes being mixed, on a more individual basis, that it would be
possible to produce more acceptable results.
Regarding the dimness of the percieved scene, there are dyes
available, and dyes can be engineered with, very narrow absorption
peaks, if dyes such as these were used, the total light reaching the
retina, would only be reduced by around 2 or 3%.
In the ChromaGen lens, the light reaching the retina was reduced
(depending on filter) by approx 30%, as the dyes used in the filter
were quite broadband in their absorption characteristics.

Leslie
callimico66@yahoo.com - 24 Apr 2007 00:46 GMT
lesliewrig...@hotmail.com wrote:
> After yet again being turnrd down for a job (this time, British
> Telecom), I thought I would post here.

Sorry to hear you were turned down. I am not colour-blind at all, but
found your link interesting--you have certainly put much time into
researching a solution. Your color-filter seemed to have worked well
and could lead to a real product in the future that could help many
people.

I understand your frustration, but I don't think you should be
considering injecting any dye in your vitreous or cornea--that's
really a radical approach.

A side note: I once read a book written by an ophthalmologist (sorry I
don't remember the name) who discussed some possible genetic reasons
for color-blindness---that I found fascinating. He said that it is
more common in people of European origin (western Europe), and that it
could have been an evolutionary adaptation originating during the time
of the last Ice Age. His theory held that people spent much more time
inside, doing tasks by firelight, and that color-blindness is an
advantage in these low and yellow-spectrum light conditions. It allows
people to see much more detail, and could have increased the ability
to do tasks involving fine detail (sewing, tool-making, etc), and thus
would have given them a competitive advantage toward survival in harsh
conditions.

C
leslie - 24 Apr 2007 01:41 GMT
On 24 Apr, 00:46, callimic...@yahoo.com wrote:
> lesliewrig...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > After yet again being turnrd down for a job (this time, British
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> C
I`m sure that people once considered laser ablating the cornea a
radical approach to eyesight correction, though it is now common place
(Lasik), but sometimes a radical approach is needed for certain
problems.

I read a similar text about the evolutionary advantages of colour
blindness, and as well as the low light capability, you mention, it
also suggested that early colour defficient man, was more easily able
to spot camoflaged prey, also giving an advantage.
I have heard rumours of the Armed forces employing red-green colour
blind people for this reason!

Leslie
callimico66@yahoo.com - 24 Apr 2007 06:36 GMT
the evolutionary advantages of colour
> blindness, and as well as the low light capability, you mention, it
> also suggested that early colour defficient man, was more easily able
> to spot camoflaged prey, also giving an advantage.
>  I have heard rumours of the Armed forces employing red-green colour
> blind people for this reason!

I had not heard about these other theories.

In my original reply to you, I was responding to your way of thinking:
That colour-blindness can be "cured" as though it were a disease. For
me, thinking of it as an evolutionary adaptation is a more positive
view. In that view, there is nothing "wrong" with you.

I would think that within the field of electronic engineering there is
work that does not require precise color-matching, and if you are
qualified in other skills (which seems likely) then you will
eventually find work doing what you like.

Gook luck, and keep working on the color-correcting lens research.
There will be far quicker acceptance of a product than there will be
of any invasive or surgical procedure.

C66
Salmon Egg - 24 Apr 2007 06:38 GMT
On 4/23/07 11:40 AM, in article
1177353622.813256.99160@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,

> After yet again being turnrd down for a job (this time, British
> Telecom), I thought I would post here.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Leslie Wright

I presume that you were rejected because you might have to read color codes
on resistors and cable conductors. Please let us know why you cannot do the
work that would be required of you.

Rather than trying to figure out how to change your vision to solve the
problems, consider inventing something that will read the color code so that
you will not need to perceive them. This will be complicated because I have
notice that the colors on resistors easily obtained vary. The modern glassy
covered colors on 1/10 watt resistors that are common now are very different
from the bakelite covered composition resistors (1/4, 1/2, 1/2, 1, and 2W)
resistors of yesteryear.

Bill
-- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.
leslie - 24 Apr 2007 13:34 GMT
> I presume that you were rejected because you might have to read color codes
> on resistors and cable conductors. Please let us know why you cannot do the
> work that would be required of you.

I can do the work. Some crackpot behind a desk deceded it was illegal,
or too much of a risk etc

> Rather than trying to figure out how to change your vision to solve the
> problems, consider inventing something that will read the color code so that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> from the bakelite covered composition resistors (1/4, 1/2, 1/2, 1, and 2W)
> resistors of yesteryear.

I use a mutimeter! However I did once build an RGB LED "light", to
illuminate the resistor. By adjusting the values of RGB, I can read
the codes, in my case it is a slight red bias.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.