Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is CK considered permanent now?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Toller - 29 Mar 2007 17:41 GMT
I looked into a couple years ago and it only lasted a few years and then
slowly faded back to the way it was before.  That seemed much worse than
doing nothing.

Now my eye doctor tells me it has improved and is permanent.  He doesn't do
it, but is referring me to someone else.

Has it improved that much?  I really don't want to mess with it if it will
be drifting around.
William Stacy - 29 Mar 2007 18:35 GMT
I hear that it is definitely more permanent than LTK was, but probably
still regresses somewhat, at least partly due to the tendency of
hyperopia to slowly increase in prebyopia. If it helps for  a year or
two I'm not sure that it's worse than doing nothing, as it is quite
safe, with almost no risk for a bad outcome.

w.stacy, o.d.

>I looked into a couple years ago and it only lasted a few years and then
>slowly faded back to the way it was before.  That seemed much worse than
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>  
William Stacy - 29 Mar 2007 18:46 GMT
Also, it can be redone several times.  I'm not sure why it hasn't really
caught on that much.
Toller - 29 Mar 2007 21:03 GMT
>I hear that it is definitely more permanent than LTK was, but probably
>still regresses somewhat, at least partly due to the tendency of hyperopia
>to slowly increase in prebyopia. If it helps for  a year or two I'm not
>sure that it's worse than doing nothing, as it is quite safe, with almost
>no risk for a bad outcome.

What I want to do is to be able to ski, drive, etc. without glasses.  I am
willling to wear them for reading.
But if it fades so I need glasses to drive, I don't see how I am any better
off then now.  And probably worse, since I would need new prescriptions more
often as it fades.
Glenn - USAEyes.org - 29 Mar 2007 18:54 GMT
Conductive Keratoplasty (CK) is a temporary method to reduce hyperopia
(farsighted, longsighted) vision or induce myopia (nearsighted,
shortsighted) vision for the purpose of monovision. CK is not
permanent, regressing at a rate of about 1.00 diopter every 2-3 years
after the initial six month healing process. We have a detailed
article about CK at:
http://www.usaeyes.org/lasik/faq/lighttouch-nearvision-ck.htm

Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification

"Consider and Choose With Confidence"

Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org

http://www.USAEyes.org

Lasik Bulletin Board
http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/

I am not a doctor.

Copyright 2007
All Rights Reserved
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.