I hear that it is definitely more permanent than LTK was, but probably
still regresses somewhat, at least partly due to the tendency of
hyperopia to slowly increase in prebyopia. If it helps for a year or
two I'm not sure that it's worse than doing nothing, as it is quite
safe, with almost no risk for a bad outcome.
w.stacy, o.d.
>I looked into a couple years ago and it only lasted a few years and then
>slowly faded back to the way it was before. That seemed much worse than
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>
William Stacy - 29 Mar 2007 18:46 GMT
Also, it can be redone several times. I'm not sure why it hasn't really
caught on that much.
Toller - 29 Mar 2007 21:03 GMT
>I hear that it is definitely more permanent than LTK was, but probably
>still regresses somewhat, at least partly due to the tendency of hyperopia
>to slowly increase in prebyopia. If it helps for a year or two I'm not
>sure that it's worse than doing nothing, as it is quite safe, with almost
>no risk for a bad outcome.
What I want to do is to be able to ski, drive, etc. without glasses. I am
willling to wear them for reading.
But if it fades so I need glasses to drive, I don't see how I am any better
off then now. And probably worse, since I would need new prescriptions more
often as it fades.
Conductive Keratoplasty (CK) is a temporary method to reduce hyperopia
(farsighted, longsighted) vision or induce myopia (nearsighted,
shortsighted) vision for the purpose of monovision. CK is not
permanent, regressing at a rate of about 1.00 diopter every 2-3 years
after the initial six month healing process. We have a detailed
article about CK at:
http://www.usaeyes.org/lasik/faq/lighttouch-nearvision-ck.htm
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
Lasik Bulletin Board
http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/
I am not a doctor.
Copyright 2007
All Rights Reserved