Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Vision in 2 Eyes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ms.Brainy - 22 Mar 2007 05:39 GMT
In my previous thread ("from Macular Hole to Retinal Detachment to
Cataract") I described my present situation and a brief history of my
eye.  I am not an eye professional, only a 68 yr old healthy woman who
just wants to retain her vision and independence, so please bear with
me.  I appreciate much the input from the professionals in this group,
but any personal experiences of others contributes to my evaluation,
and I am intelligent enough to sort things out using logic, some
knowledge and science, and mainly common sense.

I have just discovered my last (and old) Rx, and was quite surprised,
since I have forgotten the numbers.  Here they are for my distant
progressive glasses,  as prescribed on 11/20/03:

        Sphere   Cylinder   Axis    Other
O.D.    -2.50     -2.00        80      20/30
O.S.    -3.75     -1.00        92      20/25
Add:   +2.00

I still use these for driving, outdoors and TV viewing, and
occassionally for some other activities involving distant vision.

I have another Rx, prescribed on the same date, which was designed
originally for use by the computer, but I wear them most of the time
indoors, as the first pair is somewhat uncomfortable at this stage.
Here are the numbers:

        Sphere   Cylinder   Axis    Other
O.D.    -1.25     -2.00        80      20/30
O.S.    -2.50     -1.00        92      20/20
Add:   +1.00

My vision in the left eye (my "good eye") is practically unchanged,
but the right eye, after the multiple trauma it has sufferred combined
with the resulting cataract, is very poor.  I believe it's now -7.75,
but have no clue as to the astigmatism.

Interestingly, my right eye (the "bad eye") was originally less myopic
than the left, though had more astigmatism.  I believe the "20/30"
indication under "other" is the corrected result, which probably could
not be brought to 20/20 with any Rx.  My speculation is that I already
had then the beginning of a macular hole, which had developed during
the following years to stage 3, and eventually was diagnosed and
operated upon on 10/11/06.

If you recall, my cataract was formed within one month after the mac-
hole surgery, and on 12/14/06 I had a retinal detachment surgery,
contributing to a further growth of the cataract.  Both the mac-hole
and the retina are holding on in place, at least for now.

Despite the current great gap between my eyes -3.75 and -7.75), I see
pretty well, although the left eye does most of the seeing.  The fact
is that the gap does not interfere with my overall vision, and I
wonder about it.  According to what you guys have written to me on the
former thread, my brain should not be able to process the combined
signal from both eyes, or I should see double, which I don't.

The numbers I provided are of great importance in determining the
route I will take in replacing the lens in the affected eye.  At this
point I am determined not to tamper with the good, cataract-free left
eye, which means it will remain -3.75 for distance.  Probably at some
point in the future I will develop a cataract in my left, but I may be
"lucky" and die before this happens, who knows?  Meanwhile, I will
have to live with that eye as it is, correcting the other (the bad,
right eye) in such a way that will not cause a big clash in the near
future or at a later time when I will be forced to replace the other
lens as well.

Based on this information, what's your opinion?  I have an appointment
with the new cataract specialist Friday morning and I wish to have all
the feedback I can get by then.

P.S.  My myopia was much higher in previous years.  I believe it was
around -5.00 to -6.00, but was decreased gradually since my mid 40's,
when I first needed bi-focals and the astigmatism appeared.
Dan Abel - 22 Mar 2007 18:23 GMT
> Despite the current great gap between my eyes -3.75 and -7.75), I see
> pretty well, although the left eye does most of the seeing.  The fact
> is that the gap does not interfere with my overall vision, and I
> wonder about it.  According to what you guys have written to me on the
> former thread, my brain should not be able to process the combined
> signal from both eyes, or I should see double, which I don't.

The brain is pretty smart.  After some time, it just ignores one image
and you see out of one eye (which is what you posted).  This works well
for most things.  I don't recommend tennis.

:-)
William Stacy - 22 Mar 2007 21:12 GMT
Since you're determined not to touch the left eye, I'd have the surgeon
target about -2.00 after IOL (spherical lens, of course).  You should be
easily able to tolerate that differential, and if you change your mind
about that left eye, then target about 1.00 D less minus than whatever
you end up with in the right eye for the left. The reason I think you
might change your mind is you may end up with so much greater clarity
and vividness of color that you'll actually want them to do the left
eye.  My reasoning is that most people can easily handle a diopter or so
difference between the eyes.  You may not have a clinically significant
cataract in the left eye, but I can assure you you have some degree of
discoloration and haze in that lens.

w.stacy, o.d.

>In my previous thread ("from Macular Hole to Retinal Detachment to
>Cataract") I described my present situation and a brief history of my
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>
>  
Ms.Brainy - 22 Mar 2007 22:53 GMT
William,

We are beginning to get closer...  When you say "spherical lens, of
course", do you mean no correction for astigmaism?  or is it obvious
that the astigmatism will be corrected as necessary?  [I presume IOL
can correct astigmatism.]

> Since you're determined not to touch the left eye, I'd have the surgeon
> target about -2.00 after IOL (spherical lens, of course).  You should be
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> w.stacy, o.d.
Dan Abel - 24 Mar 2007 01:50 GMT
> William,
>
> We are beginning to get closer...  When you say "spherical lens, of
> course", do you mean no correction for astigmaism?  or is it obvious
> that the astigmatism will be corrected as necessary?  [I presume IOL
> can correct astigmatism.]

A bad presumption.  As I understand, and I'm not a doctor, the IOLs that
fix astigmatism don't always work.  This requires another surgery.  If
that doesn't work, another surgery.  Each one has a risk.  I wouldn't do
it.
William Stacy - 24 Mar 2007 19:29 GMT
If your astigmatism is mostly corneal, it can be corrected with limbal
relaxing incisions (LRIs) at the same time.  If it's lenticular, it  
will automatically be corrected.  I wouldn't mess with toric IOLs in
your case.  Any remaining astigmatism will be mild and easily
correctible with your glasses, so you may opt out of the LRIs as they do
add cost.  By spherical I really meant simple, single vision, as opposed
to multifocal IOLs or "focusing" IOLs.  I am in favor of prolate optics
if applicable to your eyes, and I think they are, because they can
improve the sharpness of your vision over standard optics.

w.stacy, o.d.

>William,
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
>  
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.