Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Laser for floaters?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
The Real Bev - 31 Jan 2007 00:16 GMT
So what do you guys think?

<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/30/AR2007013000119.html>

Username     mobb@deep.com
Password     mobbdeep

Signature

Cheers, Bev
=================================================================
"In all recorded history there has not been one economist who has
 had to worry about where the next meal would come from."
                     -- Peter S. Drucker, who invented management

William Stacy, O.D. - 31 Jan 2007 04:33 GMT
If it worked that well, I think most retinologists would jump at the
idea of doing it.  It would be a real money maker, for sure.

> So what do you guys think?
>
> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/30/AR2007013000119.html>
>
> Username     mobb@deep.com
> Password     mobbdeep
LarryDoc - 31 Jan 2007 09:15 GMT
> If it worked that well, I think most retinologists would jump at the
> idea of doing it.  It would be a real money maker, for sure.

Many procedures work well and are not routinely done, just as some that
are not so successful are done too often.  And, of course, profit it the
most likely motivator.

The risk factors often cited, retina pathology and increased vitreous
opacities and strands are the deal killers for many docs.  I don't think
there is a large enough test group to validate either of those issues
but from what I've read they may indeed be a non-issues.

Personally, I think that if someone's vision or lifestyle is compromised
by floaters, laser (as opposed to vitrectomy) should be a discussed
option.  Risk/benefit thing.  I just don't think there are that many
people who fit into that category to make it $$$$$.  And if we did the
less serious ones and screw up, then there ARE issues.

Perhaps when the LASIK market dries up, LAFF (laser assisted floater
fixer) will be the next big thing.

LB
Dave Bell - 12 Feb 2007 20:23 GMT
> > If it worked that well, I think most retinologists would jump at the
> > idea of doing it.  It would be a real money maker, for sure.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> less serious ones and screw up, then there ARE issues.
> LB

I'll have to ask my doc, next visit. I'm (very slowly, and perhaps
unsurely) recovering from a retinal detachment last May. With no lens
(early cataract, would be exacerbated by oil fill, plus pars plana
approach), hypotension in that eye, and a wait-and-watch approach to an
implant lens, I have one decently working eye. And that one has had an
annoying floater for many months, that mostly hangs right where it most
obscures the computer screen. I can flick it out of the way, but it
usually drifts back, all too soon...

Dave
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 31 Jan 2007 05:50 GMT
> So what do you guys think?
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>   had to worry about where the next meal would come from."
>                       -- Peter S. Drucker, who invented management

I've heard of the procedure which is done by only a couple of MD's.  I
would be worried about complications (macular edema, etc) since I
believe the laser is a YAG and usually the most visually troublesome
floaters are posterior in the eye near the retina.

but who knows-- maybe time will show that its really safe this line of
thinking is being too paranoid.
David Robins, MD - 31 Jan 2007 06:47 GMT
On 1/30/07 9:50 PM, in article
1170222610.346692.167180@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "p.clarkii@gmail.com"

>> So what do you guys think?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> but who knows-- maybe time will show that its really safe this line of
> thinking is being too paranoid.

This is a very simple procedure. Most everyone has a YAG laser just sitting
there in their office for treating posterior capsule opacification. Just the
fact that only 2 MD's do it (or at least advertise it) should tell you that
it is certainly not a widely accepted procedure. Otherwise, everyone would
do it to make a buck and try to keep patients happy.

You should read the website of Dr. Karikoff  (sp?), the one who claims to
have "invented" this procedure, which was then taken up by the other person.
It is one of the most overblown and egotistic pieces of writing I have ever
seen. I chuckle when I read it. I knew John Karikoff when I was a Georgetown
University eye resident back in the early 80's.
Irv Arons - 11 Feb 2007 05:04 GMT
I recall discussing this with Dr. Geller at least 15 years ago -- I
was considering writing it up for Ocular Surgery News -- I was then
writing the Technology Update column. For whatever reason, perhaps
because no one else was doing it, I never did write up my conversation
with Dr. Geller.

As Dr. Robins said, for most people, they learn to live with floaters.
And, for those that cannot, perhaps they might go see either Geller or
the other guy.

Irv Arons
> On 1/30/07 9:50 PM, in article
> 1170222610.346692.167180@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "p.clarkii@gmail.com"
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> seen. I chuckle when I read it. I knew John Karikoff when I was a Georgetown
> University eye resident back in the early 80's.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.