I got a blast from the OEBB list stating that a recall on CIBAVision's
O2 Optix was imminent. Anyone got the scoop?
retinula - 17 Jan 2007 13:09 GMT
they were taking certain packages of them off the shelf yesterday at
work (Wal-Mart) because they were sent a memo from Bentonville saying
that some of them have some "ionic problem that could lead to lens
movement and corneal irritation" blah blah blah. that memo was sent to
the WalMart vision center staff only. I am a part-time doc there and I
was never sent anything. i went ahead and trialed a few people in 02
Optix anyway yesterday but i had some lingering doubts.
thats all i know. yeah, something is up but it doesn't appear to be
affect ALL powers of the lens just some lot numbers. i believe a
similar screw-up has been the cause of the slow release of their toric
lenses too. and to think that CIBA had the whole silicone hydrogel
thing to themselves for years and now they've just botched it up good.
===============
> I got a blast from the OEBB list stating that a recall on CIBAVision's
> O2 Optix was imminent. Anyone got the scoop?
LarryDoc - 17 Jan 2007 23:49 GMT
> they were taking certain packages of them off the shelf yesterday at
> work (Wal-Mart) because they were sent a memo from Bentonville saying
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> thats all i know. yeah, something is up but it doesn't appear to be
> affect ALL powers of the lens just some lot numbers.
I wouldn't "blah blah blah" this. Surface defects in the lens can lead
to cornea abrasion, discomfort (obviously) and potentially infection.
You could do the sensible thing and stop fitting the lens until you have
the defective lots pulled from trial and revenue inventory. You and your
Wally wont be as affected as us private practice docs because in your
vast supply of lenses you'll still have salable multipacks. The rest of
us may be waiting months to get lenses from distributors.
LB
retinula - 18 Jan 2007 12:04 GMT
> I wouldn't "blah blah blah" this.
i wrote "blah blah blah" in my post as a way to indicate I did not
recall the exact wording of the memo.
> You could do the sensible thing and stop fitting the lens until you have
> the defective lots pulled from trial and revenue inventory.
the problem affects some manufacturing lots of 02 Optix and not others.
i DID do the sensible thing and the people i fit that day were using
lens lots that were unaffected by the product. why would you think i
would do anything else?
why do you choose to assume the negative in what i wrote?
LarryDoc - 18 Jan 2007 21:34 GMT
> > I wouldn't "blah blah blah" this.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> why do you choose to assume the negative in what i wrote?
Sorry for getting the incorrect message. It just the way the words
played and how I read it.
LB
tkelly33@yahoo.com - 25 Jan 2007 03:09 GMT
They did though make existing patients a hell of an offer to upgrade to
Night & Day or DAILIES with $100 rebates and lower cost to our
practice.
> In article <1169039342.095974.190...@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> LB
Mike Tyner - 17 Jan 2007 14:39 GMT
>I got a blast from the OEBB list stating that a recall on CIBAVision's
> O2 Optix was imminent. Anyone got the scoop?
CIBA Vision CORPORATE STATEMENT
O2OPTIXT Recall & Supply
CIBA Vision is conducting a voluntary trade-level recall of select
lots of spherical O2OPTIXT (lotrafilcon B) contact lenses, distributed
primarily in the United States, and to a lesser degree in other
countries, excluding Japan. No other CIBA Vision lenses are involved
with this recall. CIBA Vision has notified the appropriate health
authorities of this voluntary trade-level recall and is currently
notifying customers.
This recall is voluntary, proactive, and represents a responsible
course of action to assure our products consistently meet customer
expectations.
We are taking this action because we have identified that some lenses
in these lots did not meet our standards for ion permeability, a
material characteristic which contributes to lens movement on the eye.
A medical assessment, confirmed by external experts, determined that
the probability of a serious adverse event associated with use of
lenses with reduced ion permeability is remote. However, these lenses
may cause persistent discomfort and/or foreign body irritation, and
superficial corneal staining may be observed. The medical risk
associated with these signs and symptoms is low to negligible, and
upon removal of the lens, they typically resolve within 2-24 hours.
No serious adverse events have been attributed to this issue anywhere
in the world.
CIBA Vision has already implemented manufacturing process
improvements, and the ion permeability issue has been addressed.
However, product availability will continue to be affected. We
recognize the impact of this recall and product availability issues on
our customers and consumers and we appreciate their patience and
continued support. We have already taken significant measures to
build more capacity and strengthen our manufacturing and quality
infrastructure. We are confident that over time all of these combined
changes will give us the capacity and flexibility to meet the
expectations of our customers in the future.
Yeechang Lee - 21 Jan 2007 06:16 GMT
Anon E Muss wrote:
> I got a blast from the OEBB list stating that a recall on
> CIBAVision's O2 Optix was imminent. Anyone got the scoop?
My two remaining boxes of lenses are from lot numbers the recall
affects, and the symptoms described in the recall letter
(<URL:http://www.us.cibavision.com/docs/recall_letter.pdf>) help
explain a peculiar thing that happened to me last week. I have very
successfully worn the lenses on a five or six days in, one or two days
out schedule for going on two years
(<URL:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.vision/msg/e9347849f7843096>). I
put a fresh set in on Sunday and a few hours later the right lens
began to not reposition itself right, resulting in blurry vision. I
figured it'd fix itself overnight.
It didn't, and by midday Monday it was painful, like a foreign object
under the lens, with accompanying redness. I got home a little early,
took the lens out to see if I'd put it in backwards (I hadn't, of
course), rinsed it off with fresh saline, and put it back in. No luck:
The discomfort immediately returned. I gave up, took both lenses out,
and wore glasses for the rest of the week.
The redness vanished within a few days and I wore another set this
past week without incident before hearing about the recall, but only
tonight--after removing the lenses on schedule late last night--did I
check the lot numbers. Fortunately I have a single set from unaffected
lots I can wear next week while presumably awaiting new lenses,
whether from my mail-order lens dealer or from Ciba itself.
Should I bother trying to see my optometrist regarding this issue? If
it matters, my right eye is one that I've had issues from GPC and
blepharitis
(<URL:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.vision/msg/780b7a33ef2da19a>)
which I treat with Patanol drops twice a day on days when I don't wear
lenses and daily eye scrubs in the shower with a washcloth on days I
do. With this regimen the worst that happens that the right eyelashes
will every four or five weeks once or twice stick together a wee bit
in the far corner (as opposed to the massive crusting I've described
in the previous postings with different lenses and
pre-regimen). However, from the letter it didn't seem like I had much
to worry about given the lack of additional symptoms post-lens
removal. I have my yearly exam coming up in early February.

Signature
<URL:http://www.pobox.com/~ylee/> PERTH ----> *
Homemade 2.8TB RAID 5 storage array:
<URL:http://groups.google.ca/groups?selm=slrnd1g04a.5mt.ylee%40pobox.com>
Steve - 25 Jan 2007 03:49 GMT
Interesting, I stopped wearng the lenses last year as I would get a few
lenses in a pack that exhibited this behavior. I even went so far as to
report it to Ciba and sent them the defective lenses.
> Anon E Muss wrote:
>> I got a blast from the OEBB list stating that a recall on
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> to worry about given the lack of additional symptoms post-lens
> removal. I have my yearly exam coming up in early February.
caolan - 22 Jan 2007 15:30 GMT
My son has had nothing but problems since he has started using 0
Optix. His eyes have been frequently red, itchy, and generall
irritated. He has allergies anyway but even with the allerg
medication he takes, which helps with the bumps on back of eye lids
he still has problems with these lens. I just found out about th
recall when I called his eye Dr's office to renew the prescription.
How can I find out what lot numbers are affected
tkelly33@yahoo.com - 25 Jan 2007 03:13 GMT
Probably more of an issue with the allergies than the lens. Had a
problem with a 'red-eye' contact lens wearer earlier this year. Tried
everything, all silicone lenses, changed lens care to Clear Care --
still no luck. Changed patient to DAILIES, cleared up in two days.
You mentioned 'bumps on back of the lids', is your son by chance
abusing the wearing schedule of the lens and wearing for more than two
weeks?
On Jan 22, 9:30 am, indymomdott...@aol-dot-com.no-spam.invalid
> My son has had nothing but problems since he has started using 02
> Optix. His eyes have been frequently red, itchy, and generally
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> ---= Fast & Free Web Portal to Usenet Newsgroups =---
> -------------=http://www.ugroups.com/=-------------
caolan - 22 Jan 2007 15:30 GMT
My son has had nothing but problems since he has started using 0
Optix. His eyes have been frequently red, itchy, and generall
irritated. He has allergies anyway but even with the allerg
medication he takes, which helps with the bumps on back of eye lids
he still has problems with these lens. I just found out about th
recall when I called his eye Dr's office to renew the prescription.
How can I find out what lot numbers are affected
drfrank21@gmail.com - 22 Jan 2007 22:52 GMT
> My son has had nothing but problems since he has started using 02
> Optix. His eyes have been frequently red, itchy, and generally
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> ---= Fast & Free Web Portal to Usenet Newsgroups =---
> -------------= http://www.ugroups.com/ =-------------
I think that the 02 optix is a very good lens; I have
used this lens extensively with good results. Your
son sounds like he has gpc (giant papillary
conjunctivitis) which can have occured with likely
any other brand(s) of cl's. So blaming the gpc
on the 02 optix is misguided. It sounds like your
son is out of his cl's anyway so worrying about
lot numbers is moot at this point. Your doctor should
refit your son into a new lens for the time being.
I just wonder if this is going to generate a new scare
similar to the renue recall where I saw a number
of patients anxious and scared that they were
going to go blind because they used the product.
frank
Matt - 28 Jan 2007 06:37 GMT
I use these contacts, and I recently had a corneal abrasion/infection. Guess what - my supply at home was part of this recall. I don't know if my problem was related to bad contacts or not, but sure seems odd. I've been using contacts for well over 10 years and never a problem before
Matt - 28 Jan 2007 06:37 GMT
I use these contacts, and I recently had a corneal abrasion/infection. Guess what - my supply at home was part of this recall. I don't know if my problem was related to bad contacts or not, but sure seems odd. I've been using contacts for well over 10 years and never a problem before.
Carol - 28 Jan 2007 13:08 GMT
My girls and I, had an eye exam on 1/15/07 and the eye MD, praised O2 Optix lenses instead of the B/L softlens 38 we were accustomed to, we went back yesterday on 1/27/07 for follow-up to see if the O2 Optix "fit" right.. On my daughters they prescribed O2 Optix, and I had them change my RX back to B/L because I could not get my O2 Optix trial pair to focus right....We went to another supplier and then we found out that the O2 Optix were on recall...the first MD never mentioned the recall...