I have posted several threads about my 3 year old on this site(-10.5 but sees
20/60 without glasses). My question is that a year ago when I brought my
daughter in to the pediatric opthalmologist he originally had her
perscription at -12.50 each eye. He gave her a lighter perscription to start
out with though(-10.00). About 3 months later she was -11.50 each eye. About
3 months later he had her at about -11.00 each eye. Then about 3 months later
he had her at -10.50 each eye. Just recently when she went back she was -10.
25 in one eye and -10.00 in the other. The astigmatism has been about the
same for all perscriptions. I was not at the last visit and would have asked
him why its going down. I am not posting this in ANYWAY to start any
controversy. We have not been doing ANY sort of vision therapy or trying to
improve her vision in anyway, shape, or form. I was wondering if it made any
difference that she has lenticular myopia or if because she is young maybe
her lens could be changing still.
otisbrown@pa.net - 24 Dec 2006 19:32 GMT
Dear Concerned Parent,
I think I can speak for all of us in that we
hope that your daughter, starting at
20/60 vision (naked eye) will see her
distant vision improve to 20/40 or better
over the next five years or so, and
the -10 diopter lens will be a major
factor in her improving her naked eye vision.
Best,
Otis
> I have posted several threads about my 3 year old on this site(-10.5 but sees
> 20/60 without glasses). My question is that a year ago when I brought my
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Message posted via MedKB.com
> http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/vision/200612/1
otisbrown@pa.net - 25 Dec 2006 02:16 GMT
Dear Concerned Parent,
By asking the question, "...is vision getting better",
do you mean that her naked eye Snellen is
improving from 20/60 towards 20/20?
Has the ophthamologist checked her
visual acuity and reported it to you?
Best,
Otis
> I have posted several threads about my 3 year old on this site(-10.5 but sees
> 20/60 without glasses). My question is that a year ago when I brought my
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Message posted via MedKB.com
> http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/vision/200612/1
otisbrown@pa.net - 27 Dec 2006 02:13 GMT
Dear Concerned Parent,
> We have not been doing ANY sort of vision therapy or trying to
> improve her vision in anyway, shape, or form. I was wondering if it made any
> difference that she has lenticular myopia or if because she is young maybe
> her lens could be changing still.
The probably effect of a -10 diopter lens on the eye's refractive
status can be seen at:
http://vision.berkeley.edu/wildsoet/myopiaprimer.html
As the blue-tinted young eye, and its response to a lens.
I hope your daughter's refraction does not respond in
this manner to that 10 diopter lens.
Perhaps you could ask your ophthalmologist if
the -10 diopter lens will have this effect on her eyes.
Best,
Otis
> I have posted several threads about my 3 year old on this site(-10.5 but sees
> 20/60 without glasses). My question is that a year ago when I brought my
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Message posted via MedKB.com
> http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/vision/200612/1