Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Contact lenses

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kirsty - 23 Dec 2006 17:10 GMT
I want to get contacts but someone said I will get used to wearing them I
won't be able to go without them. My prescription is -2.25 is it common for
people with this prescription to wear contact lenses or do they generally
wait till their prescription is higher?
otisbrown@pa.net - 23 Dec 2006 17:35 GMT
Dear Kirsty,

Contact lenses are quite nice -- and vision is
better through them.

Your eye will "adapt" to them the same a your
current prescription.  It will not make a difference.

The only issue is comfort.  Some people can
not tolerate them.

Best,

Otis

> I want to get contacts but someone said I will get used to wearing them I
> won't be able to go without them. My prescription is -2.25 is it common for
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Message posted via MedKB.com
> http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/vision/200612/1
VicTek - 23 Dec 2006 18:38 GMT
>I want to get contacts but someone said I will get used to wearing them I
> won't be able to go without them. My prescription is -2.25 is it common
> for
> people with this prescription to wear contact lenses or do they generally
> wait till their prescription is higher?

Not sure what the person meant who said you "will get used to wearing them
and won't be able to go without them".  If you find contacts comfortable and
your vision is good then you may prefer them over wearing glasses.  I don't
know that there is a particular prescription strength that people consider a
"crossover" from glasses to contacts.  Why are you considering contacts?
Dan Abel - 23 Dec 2006 20:13 GMT
> I want to get contacts but someone said I will get used to wearing them I
> won't be able to go without them. My prescription is -2.25 is it common for
> people with this prescription to wear contact lenses or do they generally
> wait till their prescription is higher?

If you want to get them, then do so.  You may decide that you want to
continue, but you will still have the choice to stop.  It simply isn't
the case that you won't be able to go without them, if that's what you
want to do.

If you would rather wait, then that is your choice.  Contacts help more
with a higher prescription, but it is up to you.
odtobe - 24 Dec 2006 02:08 GMT
You have a wonderful Rx for contacts. It is a relativly common Rx,
meaning more options available for you. Most people can be successfully
fitted in contacts, depending on their desired activities, if any. Most
ODs will fit you in contacts, and have you follow up in a week to let
you try the lenses out. If you don't like the lenses within that week
trial tell the doc what you don't like about them, you can try several
options that will probably make you very happy.

> > I want to get contacts but someone said I will get used to wearing them I
> > won't be able to go without them. My prescription is -2.25 is it common for
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> If you would rather wait, then that is your choice.  Contacts help more
> with a higher prescription, but it is up to you.
michael toulch - 24 Dec 2006 05:03 GMT
contacts are a great way to go if you are properly fitted and you find
them comfortable.
the idea that you wont be able to go without them is a bit off the
mark.
> I want to get contacts but someone said I will get used to wearing them I
> won't be able to go without them. My prescription is -2.25 is it common for
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Message posted via MedKB.com
> http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/vision/200612/1
Kirsty - 24 Dec 2006 12:11 GMT
Thanks for the replies. I think my friend means that if I get used to wearing
contacts, assuming I'd wear them all day every day, then I would find it
difficult if I wasn’t able to wear them.  Right now I don’t wear glasses all
the time but I would if I wear contacts. I don’t know whether she means it
would make my eyes worse or I’d just get lazy.

VicTek – I want contacts because I find glasses a hassle.
Odtobe – why do you say mine is “a wonderful Rx for contacts”?
Dan – but you say that contacts help most with a higher prescription
VicTek - 24 Dec 2006 17:23 GMT
> Thanks for the replies. I think my friend means that if I get used to
> wearing
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Odtobe - why do you say mine is "a wonderful Rx for contacts"?
> Dan - but you say that contacts help most with a higher prescription

I don't currently wear contacts, but when I did I regularly switched back
and forth between them and glasses (it was many years ago and the contacts
weren't comfortable enough for wearing all day).  I understand about glasses
being a hassle.  On the plus side though, I really like being able to take
my glasses off whenever I feel like it.  Obviously you don't have that
luxury with contacts.  You didn't mention your age, but assuming that you
don't have to deal with presbyopia contacts could be an excellent solution.
Dan Abel - 24 Dec 2006 17:57 GMT
> VicTek – I want contacts because I find glasses a hassle.

IMNSHO, contacts are more of a hassle, but it was worth it for me.

> Dan – but you say that contacts help most with a higher prescription

Glasses don't work well for higher prescriptions.  They are very thick
and heavy, and hurt your nose.  Contacts work well then.  They work just
fine for lower prescriptions also, though.

I would suggest that you try them.  If you find you don't like them, you
can just go back to glasses.
Kirsty - 24 Dec 2006 20:22 GMT
I'll definately be trying contacts.  No one here seems to have a view on
whether it's right though that wearing contact will or won't make more
dependent on them (or glasses) which I'm not at the moment. That's my only
concern.
Mike Tyner - 24 Dec 2006 20:42 GMT
> I'll definately be trying contacts.  No one here seems to have a view on
> whether it's right though that wearing contact will or won't make more
> dependent on them (or glasses) which I'm not at the moment. That's my only
> concern.

We don't know what you mean by "dependent."

We _do_ know that contacts have no influence on how your myopia progresses.

-MT
odtobe - 24 Dec 2006 21:51 GMT
I only meant that you have a relatively simple Rx, there is only a
spherical power, you don't have any astigmatism. Your power is
relatively low in the grand scheme of things. This works to your
advantage in that almost manufacturers of contacts make simple sphere
power, including your power; the biggest advantage is that you will
have a lot more options than someone with a high power Rx. You will be
a very easy contact lens patient to make happy.

> > I'll definately be trying contacts.  No one here seems to have a view on
> > whether it's right though that wearing contact will or won't make more
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> -MT
Kirsty - 26 Dec 2006 07:25 GMT
By dependent I mean "get used to wearing them all the time" so that if I
don't wear them I will miss them even for things I don't currently wear
glasses for like reading, doing the ironing and generally things around the
house.  This is what has happened to my friend who wears contact lenses that
are -2.75 and now she can't do without them, even if she is only in the house
she needs to wear her glasses or contact lenses.
Mike Tyner - 26 Dec 2006 09:54 GMT
> By dependent I mean "get used to wearing them all the time" so that if I
> don't wear them I will miss them even for things I don't currently wear
> glasses for like reading, doing the ironing and generally things around
> the
> house.

Yes, it's likely you'll get fond of seeing things that you can't see without
them.

So, what, never go to Oahu or Key West - you might like it?

Your eyes won't change, but your standards might. It's the risk you take. :)

-MT
odtobe - 26 Dec 2006 18:41 GMT
You might also want to ask yourself, "why don't I wear my glassess all
the time?" If it is because you don't want to hassle with them or keep
track of them, contacts solve that propblem. If you don't like the way
you look in glasses, contacts solves that problem. With an Rx of -2.25
you most likely are needing the glasses to drive safely, or at least
pass the DPS minimum standards to get your driver's liscense. Without
your glasses your distance vision is going to be blurry, wether you
notice it or not is up for debate, but I could imagine that you do see
a pretty good improvement with your glasses. Why not enjoy this clear
vision all the time. Also keep in mind that contacts also allow a
greater field of vision. Your peripheral vision is much sharper. They
also don't get dirt and fingerprints like glasses do.

For some reason the general public is worried that they will forever
will need glasses or contacts if they wear them all the time. Or that
with time wearing your glasses makes you need stronger and stronger
prescriptions, making your eyes weaker and weaker. There is really no
evidence to support this, and is generally marketed by people
advertising for LASIK or alternate vision correction through surgery.
While there is evidence that supports the theory that increased near
work, like reading a lot, or working at short distances for several
years (like going to law school, or going to medical school) will
increase the likelyhood that you will be nearsightedness, it doesn't
support the idea that glasses or contact contribute to this trend.

IMHO: Get the contacts, be happy with the convenience, and good vision
that you are already missing out on when you don't wear you glasses.

> > By dependent I mean "get used to wearing them all the time" so that if I
> > don't wear them I will miss them even for things I don't currently wear
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> -MT
Dan Abel - 26 Dec 2006 19:33 GMT
> You might also want to ask yourself, "why don't I wear my glassess all
> the time?" If it is because you don't want to hassle with them or keep
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> greater field of vision. Your peripheral vision is much sharper. They
> also don't get dirt and fingerprints like glasses do.

They also don't fog up.
VicTek - 25 Dec 2006 01:40 GMT
> I'll definately be trying contacts.  No one here seems to have a view on
> whether it's right though that wearing contact will or won't make more
> dependent on them (or glasses) which I'm not at the moment. That's my only
> concern.

What do you mean when you say you're not dependent on glasses at the moment?
Kirsty - 27 Dec 2006 10:13 GMT
Okay thanks everyone.  Seems like the only real risk is that I get to come
face-to-face with whatever the state of my true vision is! 'In denial' no
longer an option I guess.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.