Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Price of Physio360

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TomD - 25 Nov 2006 23:32 GMT
I've been to 3 places and have been quoted $399, $399, and $450 for
Physio360 (plastic) lenses.
 With the frame I've looking at $500 ++.....  Is this really what
these lenses are selling for?

  Thanks

  Tom
Mark A - 26 Nov 2006 00:11 GMT
>  I've been to 3 places and have been quoted $399, $399, and $450 for
> Physio360 (plastic) lenses.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> >   Tom

The price depends on the type of material. Exactly what index material were
you quoted? 1.50, 1.59 (Airwear, aka polycarb), 160, 1.67, or 1.74?

Usually the price goes up when the index goes up. These lenses include
Crizal Alize AR coating, so that adds about $100 or more.
TomD - 26 Nov 2006 04:31 GMT
> >  I've been to 3 places and have been quoted $399, $399, and $450 for
> > Physio360 (plastic) lenses.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Usually the price goes up when the index goes up. These lenses include
> Crizal Alize AR coating, so that adds about $100 or more.

The $399 was for regular plastic lenses....
Mark A - 26 Nov 2006 04:48 GMT
> The $399 was for regular plastic lenses....

You mean 1.50 regular plastic (CR-39)? All of the lenses I listed are
plastic (not glass).

If you Rx is so weak that you only need a 1.50 index lens (which is
relatively thick and heavy in a moderate to high power Rx), then I wonder
why you think that you need Physio360.
TomD - 26 Nov 2006 06:18 GMT
> > The $399 was for regular plastic lenses....
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> relatively thick and heavy in a moderate to high power Rx), then I wonder
> why you think that you need Physio360.

I currently have the Panamic, but it is time for new glasses...  I've
been reading
good things about the 360 and figured I'd give them a try..

Here is the script from my most recent exam...

  +.25  -.50  010   +2.25
  +.25  -.50  170   +2.25

The reason I was considering (regular) plastic was just the price...
$399...
They want $100 extra to go with PolyCarb, which doesn't seem to be a
big favorite in this forum... and other lens materials are even more...

Maybe I'm looking at a product that I really don't need....

I appreciate your input...

Thanks
Mark A - 26 Nov 2006 07:11 GMT
> I currently have the Panamic, but it is time for new glasses...  I've
> been reading
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks

You are correct that 1.50 regular plastic is fine for your Rx. 1.60 is
better than polycarb is you need a higher index.

High-end progressive lenses definitely are expensive. One reason is
adaptation warranty, and the frequent need for free remakes (Rx adjustment,
improper measurement of fitting height by optician, etc).
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.