> ghost images as you describe are pretty normal, esp. from strong
> emitters like fluor. tubes. The blur is not normal, and means something
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> >
> >
That's a pretty confusing reply. I'm not convinced that your original
post was correct, and that they are indeed ghost images, which are
caused by internal reflections (light refracted through the front
surface, reflected off the back surface back toward the front surface,
then once again reflected back toward the eye off the front surface).
You can differentiate these ghost images from other sorts of monocular
diplopia by the fact that if the lens has any power at all, the
separation between the primary image and the ghost image will change as
you vary the part of the lens through which you are viewing, exactly as
you described in the first post. No other kind of monocular diplopia
behaves like that. Prism simply shifts the ghost image away from the
base of the prism, but the separation will still change as you move your
line of fixation. If on the other hand the lens has no refractive power,
then the ghost will be on the main image (not visible to you), or
displaced by the amount of prism, and will not vary as you use different
parts of the lens.
w.stacy, o.d.
>thanks for the reply,
>
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
>
William Stacy - 13 Nov 2006 18:44 GMT
I meant "I'm not convinced that your original post was incorrect".
Tripped up by the double negative once again...
w.stacy, o.d.
William Stacy - 13 Nov 2006 18:55 GMT
My confusing reply was made worse by my attempted correction. Here, let
me fix it one more time:
> I'm not convinced that your original post was incorrect, and I do
> think that they are indeed probably ghost images, which are caused by
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> w.stacy, o.d.
oh and yes, they can grind prism independently of the spherocylindrical
Rx, and it can be as ordered (prescribed) or accidental (inadvertent).
If it's enough, you can get binocular diplopia and other binocularity
symptoms from it.