Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Light and dark adaptation of the eye

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tim Allen - 14 Oct 2006 17:41 GMT
Hello,

I´d like to know if someone can help me with the following: Is it true
that the rods (during dark adaptation) and the cones (during light
adaptation) on the retina do all adapt to the same ambient light level
or do they just adapt to whatever light intensity hits them? If the
latter should be right this mechanism could be a powerful tool to
strech the eyes ability to deal with the enormous variations in light
intensity that we are exposed to. As I´m not totally shure that this
is the right group for this question I do cross-post it to
bionet.neuroscience.

However, thanks a lot for your answers!
Tim Allen
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 15 Oct 2006 02:16 GMT
I'm not sure exactly what you are asking.  but indeed light and dark
adaptation is exactly the reason that the human eye is able to function
over a range of approximately 5 log units of light intensity.

anyway a little web searching will give you the answers that you seek.
here is a site you should look at first as it is easy to understand and
quite succinctly accurate.

http://webvision.med.utah.edu/light_dark.html

---------------------

> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> However, thanks a lot for your answers!
> Tim Allen
Mike Ruskai - 15 Oct 2006 10:52 GMT
>Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>is the right group for this question I do cross-post it to
>bionet.neuroscience.

While the iris is tied to some measure of overall brightness, the
"adaptation" of aach photocell is nothing more than the amount of
pigment (rhodpsin for rods, one of three photopsins for cones) that
the cell can keep "in stock".  

The pigments are "destroyed" by the process of catching a photon, and
must be regenerated.  Add the regeneration rate to the destruction
rate (i.e. the number of photons hitting per unit time), and you get
some specific level of pigment.

So is your suggestion valid?  To some degree, almost certainly.  But
pigment regeneration does take time.  A full 30 minutes for the rods
to be fully stocked with rhodopsin after leaving a bright room (once
full, the rod will fire from a single photon hit).

For any given ambient lighting level, normal visual scanning will tend
to average out the pigment levels of your photocells on the whole. Any
increased dynamic range you get from individually adapted photocells
will have to be due to however much pigment is created in the few
moments you spend looking at one particular spot.  

The effect can probably be noticed if you find a particularly detailed
view where one half is in light, and one in shadow.  After fixing your
gaze on the border, details in the shadow half will become clearer as
time goes by.  
Signature

- Mike

Ignore the Python in me to send e-mail.

p.clarkii@gmail.com - 15 Oct 2006 15:29 GMT
I believe there are many other mechanisms involved in light/dark
adaptation aside from photopigment content.  such factors include
calcium regulation, opsin phosphorylation, post-receptor neural
mechanisms derived from electrical interactions from other cell-types
in the retina, switching between the cone and rod photoreceptor-based
systems, etc.  This is quite a complicated area of study in vision
research.

===========

> While the iris is tied to some measure of overall brightness, the
> "adaptation" of aach photocell is nothing more than the amount of
> pigment (rhodpsin for rods, one of three photopsins for cones) that
> the cell can keep "in stock".  
Mike Ruskai - 17 Oct 2006 06:15 GMT
>> While the iris is tied to some measure of overall brightness, the
>> "adaptation" of each photocell is nothing more than the amount of
>> pigment (rhodpsin for rods, one of three photopsins for cones) that
>> the cell can keep "in stock".  

>I believe there are many other mechanisms involved in light/dark
>adaptation aside from photopigment content.  such factors include
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>systems, etc.  This is quite a complicated area of study in vision
>research.

And "fill it up with gas then turn the key" is also quite a
simplification on how a car engine works.

The point of the original poster concerned whether adaptation acted on
the eye as a whole, or on photocells individually.

I don't think any of the countless details I left out would add up to
an eye that adapts as a whole to the average light level.
Signature

- Mike

Ignore the Python in me to send e-mail.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.