> Now, here's the thing - I'm 24 years old. Pretty much all the online
> literature suggests that PVD is a condition which affects the over 40s
> in the vast majority of cases. Could my neglect of my eyesight and
> added strain that has put upon my vision have aided the process in my
> case, or is it mere coincidence?
Coincidence. It happens.
> Secondly, I'm worried about the possibility of a retinal tear /
> detachment being missed during my examination
Don't be, especially if you doctor evaluates you on a routine basis with
a dilated fundus exam----standard procedure and protocol. PVD *reduces*,
at least statistically, the risk of retina detachment
>I do have trust in that judgement, but there's a
> part of me that worries - should I be, or would a retinal detachment
> have likely announced itself further by now? It's been almost 8 months
> since 'the flashes', afterall.
Yes, likely if it was to happen. But remember it's statistics. Just pay
attention and should you experience symptoms of retina detachment, or
even significant increases in vitreous floaters, get to the doctor ASAP.
Don't stress out or loose any sleep over it. If you do, don't worry
because that is not going to bring about a RD.
> Finally, the floaters and something I did forget to ask at my
> appointment - I'm getting bored of seeing the same 'main' ones every
> single day and the occasional new one thrown in here while that one
> fades away. Are they likely to disappear at any point or should I
> assume they might stay & continue to do as I have been of late and
> strive to ignore them?
Both are likely. As PVD continues, as the vitreous liquifies with age,
your floaters will change, hopefully for the better. On the other hand,
if symptoms get worse and it interferes with your vision and your life,
there is treatment.
I had a minor PVD when I was your age. I remember exactly when it
happened: right in the middle of a tennis match. I had many balls to
hit! It certainly put a (temporary) end to playing tennis. I can't
recall the last time I was bothered by them, it's that long ago and/or
that infrequent. The area of my retina/vitreous interface where it
happened is easily observed during examination. No big deal.
Not even remotely when compared to presbyopia setting it and taking over!
LB, O.D.
Fidelis K - 09 Oct 2006 05:02 GMT
>> Secondly, I'm worried about the possibility of a retinal tear /
>> detachment being missed during my examination
>
> Don't be, especially if you doctor evaluates you on a routine basis with
> a dilated fundus exam----standard procedure and protocol. PVD *reduces*,
> at least statistically, the risk of retina detachment
The PVD, when fully completed, does *reduce* the risk of retinal
tear/detachment. However, while going through a PVD, the person (like the
original poster) is at a *greater risk* of retinal tear/detachment although
the risk is still very small.