Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Help with lenses

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jmbbrad@sbcglobal.net - 29 Sep 2006 21:49 GMT
I have a +6.00 bifocal prescription.  Would a 1.60 high index lens with
AR coating be a good choice?  Also do high index offer better optics
and less distortion than polycarbonate lens?  I need one pair of
progressives and a second pair of line bifocals to wear around the
house and use for reading.  Would the line bifocals be fairly thin in
polycarbonate lens?  Thanks.
Mark A - 29 Sep 2006 23:08 GMT
>I have a +6.00 bifocal prescription.  Would a 1.60 high index lens with
> AR coating be a good choice?  Also do high index offer better optics
> and less distortion than polycarbonate lens?  I need one pair of
> progressives and a second pair of line bifocals to wear around the
> house and use for reading.  Would the line bifocals be fairly thin in
> polycarbonate lens?  Thanks.

Generally, the higher the index of the lens, the greater the lens distortion
(as measured by abbe value - the lower the better).

The only exception to this rule is that polycarbonate (1.59 index) has the
worst (lowest) abbe value (30) of just about any common lens material, even
those with a much higher index.

For an Rx like yours, avoid polycarb like the plague. I would suggest a good
1.60 or 1.67 index lens.

The main advantage of a higher index lens is aesthetics (thinner lens,
although plus lenses are usually not thick at the edges like minus lenses),
and a lighter lens (mostly because the lens is thinner and there is less
material in the lens). Having a lighter lens can help you see better in some
cases if it can help prevent the glasses from slipping down your nose in a
less than optimal position.
William Stacy - 29 Sep 2006 23:35 GMT
I would suggest Trivex, as it will be lighter than anything else and
stronger as well.  Can be drilled without any problem at all. Just don't
choose too big a frame.  Small is good.

w.stacy, o.d.

>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
>  
Robert Martellaro - 02 Oct 2006 19:12 GMT
>I have a +6.00 bifocal prescription.  Would a 1.60 high index lens with
>AR coating be a good choice?  Also do high index offer better optics
>and less distortion than polycarbonate lens?  I need one pair of
>progressives and a second pair of line bifocals to wear around the
>house and use for reading.  Would the line bifocals be fairly thin in
>polycarbonate lens?  Thanks.

Ask for lenses that are fully aspheric, or put an other way, lenses that are
optimized to use flatter curves. This will make the lens look thinner, reduce
weight, and decrease magnification. Rodenstock and Hoya are two companies that
use progressive designs with flatter curves. Signet Armorlite and Sola also have
lined bifocals mid-index lenses that are aspheric.

Frame shape and size will also play a significant role in lens thickness and
weight. Your optician should be able to make further recommendations based on
your visual needs and cosmetic concerns.

Hope this helps,
 

Robert Martellaro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Optician/Owner
Roberts Optical
Wauwatosa Wi.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field."
 - Niels Bohr
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.