>I have two floaters. One is big, thread-like and light-colored. The other
>is small but dark-colored (it looks like a small black insect). So, I guess
>those floaters have different origins because of the completely different
>shapes. Does anyone have an idea as to where they came from? Just curious.
On 9/28/06 2:44 PM, in article
uqydncnpSL_934HYnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@giganews.com, "Mike Tyner"
<mtyner@mindspring.com> wrote:
> Most likely your floaters are all made of the same material but some pieces
> are larger or smaller or viewed at different angles.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>> those floaters have different origins because of the completely different
>> shapes. Does anyone have an idea as to where they came from? Just curious.
Sometimes, red blood cells, erythrocytes, work there way close to the fovea
and cast a shadow. Harvey White had an article in the Scientific American a
few decades ago. He "measured" the size of erythrocytes by estimating the
angle of the shadow while recovering from some eye surgery. These would not
be your usual floaters.
Bill
-- Fermez le Bush
Don W - 29 Sep 2006 18:54 GMT
> Sometimes, red blood cells, erythrocytes, work there way close to the
> fovea
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> not
> be your usual floaters.
If you could refine that reference, would appreciate. Tried "Harvey
White" on the Scientific American site search and received no appropriate
hits.
Don W.
Salmon Egg - 29 Sep 2006 19:22 GMT
On 9/29/06 10:54 AM, in article
F5dTg.6546$e66.2282@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com, "Don W"
<dwilgus@prodigy.net> wrote:
>> Sometimes, red blood cells, erythrocytes, work there way close to the
>> fovea
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Don W.
I just checked the classic optics book by Jenkins and White to make sure I
had the correct spelling. I did. The issue I am talking about could easily
be 40 years old.
I went to the sciam site. Their easily reached search does not go back
nearly far enough.
Bill
-- Fermez le Bush
Don W - 30 Sep 2006 19:57 GMT
> I just checked the classic optics book by Jenkins and White to make sure I
> had the correct spelling. I did. The issue I am talking about could easily
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Bill
> -- Fermez le Bush
Found this site that may relate to that Sciam issue you are talking about:
http://amasci.com/freenrg/tors/floaters.html
"BIONS", LEUKOCYTES, AND "FLOATERS"
And within that writeup has the following reference:
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, in The Amateur Scientist:
"Floaters" in the eye, 1982 April, pg 150, 1982 September, pg 206
Don W.
Salmon Egg - 01 Oct 2006 01:05 GMT
On 9/30/06 11:57 AM, in article
y6zTg.7524$vJ2.2247@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com, "Don W"
<dwilgus@prodigy.net> wrote:
>> I just checked the classic optics book by Jenkins and White to make sure I
>> had the correct spelling. I did. The issue I am talking about could easily
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Don W.
There have been a number of articles in the Amateur Scientist section over
the years. The reference given is interesting but not the one I, perhaps
erroneously, remember. I remember a regular article from longer ago.
Bill
-- Fermez le Bush
Mike Tyner - 29 Sep 2006 19:42 GMT
> Sometimes, red blood cells, erythrocytes, work there way close to the
> fovea
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> not
> be your usual floaters.
No, because free red blood cells don't normally float in the vitreous.
Floaters are pretty much all collagen. Some are embryonic remnants like
cloquet's canal, some are sheets of thickened vitreous peeled off the
retina, and some coalesce out of transparent vitreous. The only other common
cause would be a variety of inflammations and trauma that cause abnormal
opacities. But these, too, are largely collagen.
-MT
Salmon Egg - 30 Sep 2006 02:41 GMT
On 9/29/06 11:42 AM, in article
MZ-dnTi_qrKE9IDYnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Mike Tyner"
<mtyner@mindspring.com> wrote:
>> Sometimes, red blood cells, erythrocytes, work there way close to the
>> fovea
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> -MT
IIRC over the decades, White was in the hospital for some kind of eye
problem. Either the problem itself or its treatment led to blood cells being
introduced into his eyes. He was trying to pass the time by using the
opportunity to measure the cell size. Being much smaller that erythrocytes,
it should not be a problem to note their presence. He may have taken into
account diffraction.
There are indexes of the Scientific American that go back that far. They
should be available in an academic library.
Bill
-- Fermez le Bush
Don W - 30 Sep 2006 04:02 GMT
> IIRC over the decades, White was in the hospital for some kind of eye
> problem. Either the problem itself or its treatment led to blood cells
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Bill
> -- Fermez le Bush
What is interesting about your comment is that white cells have been
observed in the vascular system around the fovea. But red cells have not.
Just exactly how White had his red cells injected would be very interesting.
I'm almost sure if you asked a reference librarian he would go to the
Internet and not quite make the time period you are indicating. Google
search produced nothing for me. In a retinal meeting in 1998, there was a
paper (abstract) on the fluorescent labeling of erythrocytes and
angiographic examination. But this from what you are saying was not what
had happened here. Also I have one reference that says the red cells can't
be seen (no reason given).
Don W.
Don W - 30 Sep 2006 04:06 GMT
> The only other common
> cause would be a variety of inflammations and trauma that cause abnormal
> opacities. But these, too, are largely collagen.
>
> -MT
In the event of a macular degeneration problem, could not part of the
scaring tissue from the scotoma break off and be seen as a floater?
Don W.
Mike Tyner - 30 Sep 2006 10:59 GMT
> In the event of a macular degeneration problem, could not part of the
> scaring tissue from the scotoma break off and be seen as a floater?
It could, but macular degeneration doesn't usually give rise to floaters.
The scarring is tightly bound to the retina.
Vitritis and retinopathy of prematurity are prone to leave vitreous strands,
which are still mostly collagen.
-MT