Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Update on floater attack

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jhill524@hotmail.com - 26 Sep 2006 20:55 GMT
I'm the guy who posted about the "major floater attack" about a month
ago.

I saw my optometrist yesterday, and he dilated my eyes and looked at
them through a microscope.  He said he saw nothing unusual or of cause
for concern.  I even showed him a picture I had drawn of some of my
bothersome floaters from a month past, and he said they didn't look too
unusual.  He also said that the vitreous in my eyes may have more
liquid than those of other people, which may have caused the
"twitching" motion of the "legs" on the floaters I had seen.

However, he did say that such "closed-eye" floaters (as opposed to the
ones people see with their eyes open) are usually dim and shouldn't be
as vivid as they had been that one night.  I told him (as I had on the
phone earlier) that I had been working long hours that night and hadn't
slept in a long time, and consequently I had been drinking a lot of
coffee.  He said that this could have caused a blood fluctuation in the
visual part of my brain, making my floaters much more noticeable.

So, my "new" floaters weren't really new at all -- just temporarily
more visible than before.

Anyway, thanks to everyone who gave me advice beforehand.  Just letting
you all know my eyes aren't in any serious danger.
drfrank21@gmail.com - 27 Sep 2006 19:48 GMT
> I'm the guy who posted about the "major floater attack" about a month
> ago.

I had seen.

> However, he did say that such "closed-eye" floaters (as opposed to the
> ones people see with their eyes open) are usually dim and shouldn't be
> as vivid as they had been that one night.

I've never heard of terminology of "closed- eye" floaters vs
"open-eyed"
floaters.

I told him (as I had on the
> phone earlier) that I had been working long hours that night and hadn't
> slept in a long time, and consequently I had been drinking a lot of
> coffee.  He said that this could have caused a blood fluctuation in the
> visual part of my brain, making my floaters much more noticeable.

Never heard of "blood" fluctuation or that term used to explain
floaters being more noticeable. Dilation of the retinal vasculature
by a vasodilator (ie caffeine) IMO would not cause your floaters
to be more noticeable. It's more of an effect of gazing at a
homogenous background (ie a clear blue sky) that would cause
you to see your floaters better.

> So, my "new" floaters weren't really new at all -- just temporarily
> more visible than before.

The important thing is that the provider didn't see any retinal
integrity problems (ie retinal tear/detachment). But I think he
was giving you a bs line regarding the above.

frank
jhill524@hotmail.com - 28 Sep 2006 00:16 GMT
> I've never heard of terminology of "closed- eye" floaters vs
> "open-eyed"
> floaters.

He didn't use that exact terminology, but he did say that, depending on
the location of the floaters in the eye, some may appear more vividly
(and from what I've experienced, these are the much bigger ones) when
ones eyes are closed, or while in the dark.

> It's more of an effect of gazing at a
> homogenous background (ie a clear blue sky) that would cause
> you to see your floaters better.

Again, what you say only applies to the "open-eye" floaters,
apparently.

> > So, my "new" floaters weren't really new at all -- just temporarily
> > more visible than before.
> >
> The important thing is that the provider didn't see any retinal
> integrity problems (ie retinal tear/detachment). But I think he
> was giving you a bs line regarding the above.

Well, to be fair, he did say "MAY have."  There must have been some
reason why they were so much more visible that one night than they had
ever been before or since, and the combination of stress and too much
caffeine was the only probable cause that I could think of.  And since
nothing was obviously wrong with my eyes, he couldn't think of a more
reasonable explanation...and neither can I.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.