> Most of the Macrolenses I fit are for special cases, i.e. post-LASIK,
> keratoconus, post-corneal transplant, etc.
>
> DrG
Why is that? There must be _some_ downside you are avoiding by
defaulting to the small RGPs. Comfort, cost, quality of vision ...
something. Do your wife and assistant wear them simply because they
like them, or because they are special cases?
Thanks.
--
Dr. Leukoma - 17 Sep 2006 15:16 GMT
> Why is that? There must be _some_ downside you are avoiding by
> defaulting to the small RGPs. Comfort, cost, quality of vision ...
> something. Do your wife and assistant wear them simply because they
> like them, or because they are special cases?
My wife wore corneal RGP lenses for much of her life. Her eyes became
dry, red, etc. She also has astigmatism. Toric softs didn't work for
her. Macrolenses did. My assistant had LASIK in 1998. Now she sees
one image instead of multiple images. She has to remove the lenses
during the day to rinse them, but it's worth it to her.
There are many nuances to fitting contact lenses that come only from
many years of experience and cannot be explained in one paragraph.
Macrolenses can be complex to fit. I am one of those who leans towards
disposable soft lenses for simple prescriptions. In some situations,
Macrolenses are a problem solver. For specialty fits, I can charge
enough of a fee to cover the increased chair time and costs associated
with fitting the Macrolens.
My advice is to go to the C&H Contacts website and find a fitter in
your area who will trial fit you. Unfortunately, you may have to shell
out some bucks to try them.
DrG