> Inexpensive finished blanks are available to any optician that cares to
> stock them. I have a couple hundred you can have for $3 each.
>
> -MT
I would hope it would be obvious, but lens pricing is not about the
materials but the technology. Not all stock lenses are created equal
when it comes to scratch resistance, optics, thickness, etc. Also,
most people do not have the know-how or equipment to turn that stock
lens into a proper pair of glasses, so whether LC pays $3 or $30 for
lenses themselves, that is only a small part of the profit picture.
BTW@ - 19 Aug 2006 06:52 GMT
> I would hope it would be obvious, but lens pricing is not about the
> materials but the technology. Not all stock lenses are created equal
> when it comes to scratch resistance, optics, thickness, etc. Also,
> most people do not have the know-how or equipment to turn that stock
> lens into a proper pair of glasses, so whether LC pays $3 or $30 for
> lenses themselves, that is only a small part of the profit picture.
I'm sure that's only a small part of the profit picture. And definitely
lenses have more technology involved than frames do. My friend just
wanted to replace the lenses. She went to that smaller shop and was
quoted a price about 50% cheaper than LC could give her. Perhaps LC use
different stock lenses. They'd better be, given the higher prices. But,
at the end of the day, do the consumers really notice any difference
between one brand of stock lenses and the other?
Also, consumers go to LC, every coating they want they have to pay extra
for it. But, my friend was told that those stock lenses already have all
the anti-glare, scratch-resistance coating, etc., on them. One has to
wonder how much "additional" charges LC and the like are charging its
customers.