Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Clear lens extraction (CLE)?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mike - 03 Aug 2006 04:26 GMT
I have nystagmus and have high myopia (-15).  My BCVA is 20/80 on
average.

Would CLE give me better quality vision along with a better BCVA?

I'm thinking my nystagmus may not allow me to get the best result from
my contacts.

What are the chances of achieving 20/70 or better?

Thanks
-m
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 03 Aug 2006 05:19 GMT
I am not a doctor but I dont see how IOLs would improve things over
contacts. Maybe vision theraphy to improve whatever disorders you have
would be more effective. If your reason is to correct your super high
myopia and avoid cateracts, maybe IOLs could be justified. If you have
no good reason or unrelistic expectations, stick with glasses and
contacts. Try vision theraphy and natural vision improvement. How did
your eyes get so bad and how well do you see without glasses, how far
can you count fingers? Just curious what a -15 sees!
serebel - 03 Aug 2006 06:24 GMT
> I am not a doctor but I dont see how IOLs would improve things over
> contacts. Maybe vision theraphy to improve whatever disorders you have
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> your eyes get so bad and how well do you see without glasses, how far
> can you count fingers? Just curious what a -15 sees!

Ace is not a doctor, but he is a retard.
Robert Kopp - 03 Aug 2006 08:05 GMT
> I am not a doctor but I dont see how IOLs would improve things over
> contacts. Maybe vision theraphy to improve whatever disorders you have
> would be more effective. If your reason is to correct your super high
> myopia and avoid cateracts, maybe IOLs could be justified.

With CLE, the risk of retinal detachment would probably not be negligible at
this level of correction. I've heard of phakic IOL's, which are appropriate
for this level of correction and might be worth investigating. Forget
LASIK.

Signature

Robert T. Kopp
http://analytic.tripod.com

Anon E. Muss - 03 Aug 2006 07:24 GMT
>I have nystagmus and have high myopia (-15).  My BCVA is 20/80 on
>average.
>
>Would CLE give me better quality vision along with a better BCVA?

Probably NOT.

>I'm thinking my nystagmus may not allow me to get the best result from
>my contacts.
>
>What are the chances of achieving 20/70 or better?

Very unlikely.
Dr Judy - 04 Aug 2006 03:18 GMT
> I have nystagmus and have high myopia (-15).  My BCVA is 20/80 on
> average.
>
> Would CLE give me better quality vision along with a better BCVA?

Unlikely.  Your poor BCVA is due to the nystagmus and CLE will not
alter that.

> I'm thinking my nystagmus may not allow me to get the best result from
> my contacts.

The nystagmus should not affect the contacts, but will cause your BCVA
with glasses or contacts to be reduced.

> What are the chances of achieving 20/70 or better?

If you don't get 20/70 with glasses or contacts then you will not get
20/70 with CLE either.

Dr Judy
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.