Last week I posted a message in which I asked the group which IOL they
thought would be right for me. I had just seen a Lasik/Opthamologist
Surgeon, and he suggested a Clear Lens Extraction for me. I told him it had
become increasingly more difficult for me to tolerate wearing my lens (just
a -12 in my left eye . . . right eye has perfect vision).
The doctor told me I was becoming allergic to my lens, that over time the
eye reacts to the proteins built up and starts to reject the lens. I wear
an AcuVue 2, and can keep it in my eye for as long as two weeks. Often, I'm
hardly aware of it at all. Sometimes, after only a day, I wake up in the
middle of the night and my eye feels like it is in a vise, and I have to rip
it out and throw it away. It takes at least a day or two before my eye
feels well enough for me to put in another lens. The eye stays with a raw
feeling, as if I had scratched it. I am finding it more difficult to put
the lens in. It used to pop right in and now it seems as if my eye wants to
spit it out. Sometimes it takes me 4 or 5 tries to get it in, whereas it
used to be much simpler.
Today I went back to my longtime Opthamologist and she said my eye was not
allergic to anything. She said my cornea looked as perfect as could be and
showed no signs whatsoever that I've been wearing a lens in that eye for 25
years. She suggested that my eye simply gets dry and I should try and
maintain a more consistent regimen of lubrication. Regular lubrication as
opposed to when it started to feel a bit dry. She is having me try the
AcuVue Advanced, as she says it is even easier to wear than the AcuVue2's.
Are their any other extended wear lenses in -12 which would be easy to wear,
or is the AcuVue Advanced the best?
She is also going to let me try a Multifocal contact, in case it does
continue to become intolerable for me to wear a lens, and I opt for the CLE.
As someone suggested to me in my other post, it would be a trial of sorts as
to how I'd adjust to a Restor lens rather than a monofocal IOL.
For the time being, I am not considering a CLE. I wouldn't think of getting
surgery on my eye unless there was no other options. Wearing the lens is
something I've been doing for a longtime, and if I can continue to do so,
I'm happy with it. It was only because I thought I could no longer
comfortably wear a lens that I even considered implantables or other
options.
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 03 Aug 2006 01:58 GMT
If you have been wearing the same contact for two weeks strait, no
wonder your having problems! You may wear the same brand you prefer,
but take it out before you go to bed and insert it after you wake! You
may occasionally sleep in contacts with some risk but its very bad to
wear the lens 2 weeks strait without taking it out to clean and give
your eye(s) a rest!
Anon E. Muss - 03 Aug 2006 06:08 GMT
>Last week I posted a message in which I asked the group which IOL they
>thought would be right for me. I had just seen a Lasik/Opthamologist
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>The doctor told me I was becoming allergic to my lens, that over time
>the eye reacts to the proteins built up and starts to reject the lens.
It's called Giant Papillary Conjunctivitis
(<http://tinyurl.com/l4v7e>).
>I wear an AcuVue 2
Acuvue 2? How medieval.
>and can keep it in my eye for as long as two weeks. Often, I'm
>hardly aware of it at all. Sometimes, after only a day, I wake up in
>the middle of the night and my eye feels like it is in a vise, and I
>have to rip it out and throw it away. It takes at least a day or two
>before my eye feels well enough for me to put in another lens.
Maybe your eye is trying to tell you something? Maybe your eye
bothering you shouldn't be the barometer for when you decide to
replace your contacts? Put another way, are you obeying your doctor's
instructions when it comes to your lens replacement schedule?
Additional newsflash: Don't wait until your teeth hurt before you
brush them. Don't wait until you feel like crap before you decide to
take your high blood pressure or diabetic medications.
We're talking Common Sense 101 here.
>The eye stays with a raw feeling, as if I had scratched it. I am
>finding it more difficult to put the lens in. It used to pop right in
>and now it seems as if my eye wants to spit it out. Sometimes it
>takes me 4 or 5 tries to get it in, whereas it used to be much
>simpler.
Classic GPC symptoms.
>Today I went back to my longtime Opthamologist and she said my eye was
>not allergic to anything.
Please tell me she everted ("flipped") and examined underneath your
upper eyelids.
>She said my cornea looked as perfect as could be and showed no signs
>whatsoever that I've been wearing a lens in that eye for 25 years.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Are their any other extended wear lenses in -12 which would be easy to
>wear, or is the AcuVue Advanced the best?
The only frequent replacement soft contact lens that I am aware of
that is approved for >6 days of continuous wear is Ciba's Focus Night
& Day. But that isn't available in a -12D.
If you insist on wearing the lens that long, then that is the only
lens IMHO you should be prescribed 99%+ of the time in 8/2006.
For GPC (and for pretty much every HEMA SCL wearer, especially a -12D
myope), I'd either put you in one the various silicone hydrogel CLs
with a rigorous cleaning regimen and frequent replacement schedule
(first choice/mild cases) or a daily disposable (second choice/severe
cases).
I know the Acuvue Advance and the Acuvue Oasys (approved for <=6d of
continuous wear) come in -12D, but none of the other silicone
hydrogels do. I prefer the Acuvue Oasys over the Acuvue Advanced if I
have a choice.
>She is also going to let me try a Multifocal contact, in case it does
>continue to become intolerable for me to wear a lens
If the reason CL wear is becoming intolerable is because of GPC, then
your doctor needs to do the things that need to be done to manage your
condition which include any, some or all of the following:
o Discontinuing CL wear for 2-4 weeks.
o Switch to a more frequent replacement schedule -- daily disposable
is often best.
o Topical mast-cell stabilizer (long term) or topical
glucocorticosteroids (short term).
o Stop wearing contacts on a continuous wear basis.
o Proper lens cleaning regimen.
>and I opt for the CLE. As someone suggested to me in my other post,
>it would be a trial of sorts as to how I'd adjust to a Restor lens
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>comfortably wear a lens that I even considered implantables or other
>options.
Having to completely discontinue contact lens wear secondary to GPC is
quite rare in 8/2006. I am not a big fan of clear lens extractions
when a patient is essentially contact lens tolerant.
Talk to your doctor regarding the following advice: Stop sleeping in
your lenses. Clean them thouroughly daily or switch to daily
disposables and in all likelihood, your will be able to resume
successful contact lens wear again.
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 03 Aug 2006 12:58 GMT
"Talk to your doctor regarding the following advice: Stop sleeping in
your lenses. Clean them thouroughly daily or switch to daily
disposables and in all likelihood, your will be able to resume
successful contact lens wear again."
My own optometrist tells all his patients to never sleep in contacts.
Sleeping in contacts the occasioanl night isnt too bad, sleeping every
night and not removing your contacts for a week or more is.
Anon E. Muss - 03 Aug 2006 15:01 GMT
[snip]
>My own optometrist tells all his patients to never sleep in contacts.
>Sleeping in contacts the occasioanl night isnt too bad, sleeping every
>night and not removing your contacts for a week or more is.
Continuous wear is relatively risky.
It increases your risk for microbial keratitis, GPC and other
contact-lens related problems over daily-wear of contact lenses.
Taking a nap or sleeping in your lenses overnight on an occasional
basis (1X/week or less) while in silicone hydrogel lenses is something
I normally don't have a problem with and something I've found to be
relatively safe. However, daily wear only is best.
Dr. Leukoma - 03 Aug 2006 15:35 GMT
> Continuous wear is relatively risky.
I find it helps to give comparisons, i.e. relative to what?
DrG
Anon E. Muss - 03 Aug 2006 18:19 GMT
>> Continuous wear is relatively risky.
>
>I find it helps to give comparisons, i.e. relative to what?
Relative to NOT sleeping in your lenses.
Anywhere from 6 to 12X greater risk of microbial keratitis versus DW.
Dr. Leukoma - 03 Aug 2006 13:36 GMT
> Are their any other extended wear lenses in -12 which would be easy to wear,
> or is the AcuVue Advanced the best?
It depends on one's criteria. Having worn both, my opinion is that the
Acuvue Oasys is a better lens, with higher oxygen permeability, lower
water content, and it is available up to -12D.
> She is also going to let me try a Multifocal contact, in case it does
> continue to become intolerable for me to wear a lens, and I opt for the CLE.
> As someone suggested to me in my other post, it would be a trial of sorts as
> to how I'd adjust to a Restor lens rather than a monofocal IOL.
Why not monovision in that eye?
> For the time being, I am not considering a CLE. I wouldn't think of getting
> surgery on my eye unless there was no other options. Wearing the lens is
> something I've been doing for a longtime, and if I can continue to do so,
> I'm happy with it. It was only because I thought I could no longer
> comfortably wear a lens that I even considered implantables or other
> options.
Indeed, a very wise choice. Besides, has anybody recommended topical
treatment for your "allergy," such as Patanol, twice daily?
DrG
sdavies6 - 03 Aug 2006 18:34 GMT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Leukoma" <drg@leukoma.com>
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: Allergic to Contacts?
>> She is also going to let me try a Multifocal contact, in case it does
>> continue to become intolerable for me to wear a lens, and I opt for the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Why not monovision in that eye?
Perhaps monovision. The thought was Restor would perhaps eliminate the need
for reading glasses. However, I would be a bit leery of the possibility
that having only one lens and one good eye, there might be a difficult
period of adjustment, or none at all. So, the thought would be to test it
out. If I go with an IOL, and at this point it is not a sure thing at all,
I could easily go with monovision and continue to use reading glasses.
Anon E. Muss - 03 Aug 2006 18:51 GMT
[snip]
>The thought was Restor would perhaps eliminate the need for reading
>glasses. However, I would be a bit leery of the possibility that
>having only one lens and one good eye
Wait.
You have only *one good eye*, but have been abusing your eyes by
sleeping in contacts only approved for up to 6d of EW for 2+ weeks
straight? (Cyrnfr chg gur penpx cvcr qbja.)
And you are considering CLE, or a multifocal IOL?
I wouldn't consider those in 99+% of monocular patients.
Get another opinion.
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 03 Aug 2006 20:58 GMT
> [snip]
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Get another opinion.
Yea its sad how many eyes get ruined. I read that eyes get the least
care of any body part! People take better care of their teeth than
eyes! Alot of people are uninformed of the risks of extended wear
contacts, some dont give a darn, I know about 5 people like that.
Thousands more ruin their eyes by getting lasik, especially if they are
bad candidates. Why do some people post asking "should I get lasik" and
when we all say "no, your a bad candidate" or "not a good idea" they go
ahead anyway and get lasik? Some people just wont listen!
Mike Tyner - 03 Aug 2006 21:26 GMT
> Yea its sad how many eyes get ruined. I read that eyes get the least
> care of any body part! People take better care of their teeth than
> eyes!
I agree. Brush your eyes twice a day and see your optometrist every six
months.
-MT