 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Vision / August 2006Orthokeratology with high plus inverted focus day and night soft contacts!
http://www.nzoptics.co.nz/backissues/aug03.htm I fitted her with Focus Night & Day lenses 8.6/13.8 - Right dominant for distance with +1.25D and Left +3.75D, for near. She was rapt with the results and wore them successfully for up to 30N EW, for a few weeks. After being ill and not wearing the lenses for around two months she came in within a month or two of resuming wear complaining of reduced vision, particularly at near. She reported she was struggling to read the paper and do other fine near visual tasks. Measurements revealed that she needed more plus in the left eye [around +1.00D more] and refraction confirmed a hyperopic shift of a similar order. Sure enough K readings confirmed that indeed her cornea had flattened around 1.00D http://www.siliconehydrogels.org/editorials/previous_editorial_nina.asp My comments: Whoa! Nice find! The highest plus for focus day and night is +6 which is plenty, enough for a reduction of 1.5 to 2 diopters of myopia! I guess this could be "poor man's" orthoK One challenge is the person inverting the contacts inside out, sleeping in them then waking up will see very blurry till the lenses are removed. But the improvement in vision is amazing! Low myopes less than -3 may greatly reduce, if not eliminate their dependacy on glasses while more moderate myopes of -3 to -5 will experience a significent improve in UCVA and a reduction in glasses dependacy. > One challenge is the person inverting the contacts inside > out, sleeping in them then waking up will see very blurry > till the lenses are removed. But the improvement in > vision is amazing! Dicky would be proud of you Ace. This expose along with the home LASIK kit will reduce any vision care cost by orders of magnitude. -Quick > > One challenge is the person inverting the contacts inside > > out, sleeping in them then waking up will see very blurry [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > -Quick Home lasik is a hoax. A trained surgeon needs to operate the laser, not some noob doing it himself at home. Its impossible to give yourself lasik as you wouldnt see what you were doing either. I doubt anyone has even attempted RK on themselves! OrthoK is a reality and far safer than any refractive surgury, you havent read the article! >>> One challenge is the person inverting the contacts >>> inside out, sleeping in them then waking up will see [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > OrthoK is a reality and far safer than any refractive > surgury, you havent read the article! No. I saw it on the internet. They had pictures of the kit and more pictures of someone giving themself LASIK. How do you explain that? It must be true! You're just one of all those others trying to keep up the ridiculous cost of these simple procedures that you can do yourself. -Quick > Home lasik is a hoax. A trained surgeon needs to operate the laser, not > some noob doing it himself at home. Its impossible to give yourself > lasik as you wouldnt see what you were doing either. I doubt anyone has > even attempted RK on themselves! > OrthoK is a reality and far safer than any refractive surgury, you > havent read the article! Is it possible to be more retarded than this? Alot of people could be benefitting from this simple way of orthoK! All it takes is a prescription of +6 lens and you can make history about -1.5 diopters of your myopia! Will greatly reduce glasses dependency for low myopes less than -3. Will still benefit those up to -5. RGP orthoK can make history much higher amounts of myopia. > Alot of people could be benefitting from this simple way of orthoK! All > it takes is a prescription of +6 lens and you can make history about > -1.5 diopters of your myopia! Will greatly reduce glasses dependency > for low myopes less than -3. Will still benefit those up to -5. RGP > orthoK can make history much higher amounts of myopia. Apparently it is possible to post more retarded crap on a continuing basis. Hi, my name is Nancy and I like to play with little boys. By the way, I also think that I can eliminate my myopa with plus lenses. Even if the nice plus doesn't get rid of the evil minus, I still like to play with penises. Nancy, your friend CatMan (Grant) You reveal the type of mind you have. That is some majority-opinion you have. Do you call youself a professional? I wonder why -- when other professionals support plus-prevention for their own children. Are you defending your "practice", versus helping people understand the preventive alternative? Or are you afraid of the consequences when they recognize the scientific truth about the proven dynamic behavior of all fundamental eyes? Otis > Hi, my name is Nancy and I like to play with little boys. By the way, I > also think that I can eliminate my myopa with plus lenses. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Nancy, your friend > I wonder why -- when other professionals support > plus-prevention for their own children. Thus far, you have come up with one eye professional who does this. Where are the others? > Are you defending your "practice", versus helping > people understand the preventive alternative? He doesn't have to "defend" his practice, but you certainly need to defend yours. Unfortunately, there is no defense for what amounts to science fiction. > Or are you afraid of the consequences when they > recognize the scientific truth about the proven > dynamic behavior of all fundamental eyes? [sarcasm]How long does it take for the world to come to their senses, Otis? When will the world recognize you, poor, unrecognized genius that you are? [/sarcasm] DrG > [sarcasm]How long does it take for the world to come to > their senses, Otis? When will the world recognize you, > poor, unrecognized genius that you are? [/sarcasm] There is an upside. Otis will only need a small pitcher when it comes time to drink the Kool-aid. -Quick Im supprised none of you guys and optometrists have heard of it! It will be revolutionary for most low(er) myopes with little or no astigmatism! |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.