> Dear Dr. Frank,
>
> Thank you for your response to my inquiry! Are you saying that you HAVE had
> positive feedback from those who asked for "monovision" glasses?
I have a few patients doing both monovision with cl's and glasses but
they are in the minority and with much less than the 4 diopters
of difference than what you have. Without actually trying it for you
I couldn't predict how well you would do.
> I think that I read somewhere on this newsgroup that Crizal's Alize is not
> available to Trivex material. Am really curious as to that, since, after
> speaking with my insurer, I was led to believe that Crizal Alize is an
> option that they would cover. (But do they realize that Crizal Alize might
> not be available as a coating on Trivex lenses?)
Tammy, even a regular cr-39 (regular plastic) would be suitable
for you. I don't have the information in front of me so I'm not sure
whether the Alize is available on Tivex. Your optician could tell
you for sure. Best of luck.
frank
TangoZ - 24 Jul 2006 00:35 GMT
drfrank21@gmail.com posted:
<snipped for brevity>
> Tammy, even a regular cr-39 (regular plastic) would be suitable
> for you. I don't have the information in front of me so I'm not sure
> whether the Alize is available on Tivex. Your optician could tell
> you for sure. Best of luck.
Thanks again, Dr. Frank, for your comments!
My optometrist said he suggests polycarbs for semi-rimless frames, as the
lens thickness-variance between the two sides would not be as noticeable.
Would the cr-39 lenses (-2.00 [left] and 0.00 [right]) be so awkward-looking
together, in a rimless frame?
BTW, I made it very clear to my optometrist that vision acuity was of
import; that a negligible difference in thickness between the two lenses
mattered far less, as I would be wearing the glasses at home, at night,
primarily.
Thank you so much for your perceptiveness and professionalism!
Best,
Tammy