Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Contacts for astigmatism

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Charles - 18 Jul 2006 00:12 GMT
For astigmatism, especially if using RGP type lenses, it seems like you
could build the backside of the lens to fairly precisely match the
shape of the cornea.  With it like this, the lens would suck in to the
cornea in a known orientation, so rotation would not be an issue
(assuming enough corneal astigmatism, and thin enough tear layer).
With that, the outer surface of the lens could be built to provide the
desired correction.

Why is this a bad idea?  I assume someone has thought of it.  Is it
just too hard to manufacture super custom lenses like that?

--
Quick - 18 Jul 2006 00:54 GMT
> For astigmatism, especially if using RGP type lenses, it
> seems like you could build the backside of the lens to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> it.  Is it just too hard to manufacture super custom
> lenses like that?

My doc offers these or something similar. I will have to
check to see what it's called. They use the raw data from
a corneal topographer to manufacture the lenses.

hmmm, just checked his website. It's not on there any more.
Wonder if the company didn't make it or something? I'll
ask next time I go in.

-Quick
Dr. Leukoma - 19 Jul 2006 12:00 GMT
> My doc offers these or something similar. I will have to
> check to see what it's called. They use the raw data from
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Wonder if the company didn't make it or something? I'll
> ask next time I go in.

Maybe they couldn't live up to their own hype.  A common tale.

DrG
Dr Judy - 18 Jul 2006 03:46 GMT
> For astigmatism, especially if using RGP type lenses, it seems like you
> could build the backside of the lens to fairly precisely match the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Why is this a bad idea?  I assume someone has thought of it.  Is it
> just too hard to manufacture super custom lenses like that?

Neither a bad idea nor a new one.

The lens you describe has been available as a rigid design for over 50
years, it is called a back toric and is used primarily to achieve a
better fit on corneas with significant astigmatism.  The toric back
curve creates a tear lens with astigmatism which may or may not be
needed.  If not needed then the front surface of the lens must also be
made toric to compensate.  This is called a bitoric design.

It is more difficult to make and fit and is about double the cost of
spherical rigid lenses.

Quite a few of the soft toric lenses currently available use a toric
back surface as part of the stability design.

Dr Judy
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.