> That is your high risk factor. Same happened to me, very near sighted,
> and after cataract surgery----about two years lafter a retinal
> detachment.
What steps/precautions can be taken now to minimize the odds on the
remaining eye?
When I state that my recovery is going well, I also have to observe
that I cannot see any degree of closeup detail. I can recognize shapes
& colors for which I am grateful.
If both eyes were in the same condition, I would be essentially blind.
I also need to mention that I am relatively young. I had the cataract
surgery two years ago at the age of 52.
K
Charles - 19 Jun 2006 23:54 GMT
> What steps/precautions can be taken now to minimize the odds on the
> remaining eye?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I also need to mention that I am relatively young. I had the cataract
> surgery two years ago at the age of 52.
As far a minimizing the odds in the other eye, the retina specialist
who see I every year as followup can only suggest not having the
cataract surgery until necessary. Since the cataract in the other eye
is small and has not progressed for about ten years I have taken that
advise.
I hope your recovery goes well. I had a very good recovery. I lost a
half diopter, and I can correct that eye to 20/20 with a contact lens.
I was around 45 when I had the detachment. That was about ten years
ago.

Signature
Charles
Dr Judy - 20 Jun 2006 14:36 GMT
> > That is your high risk factor. Same happened to me, very near sighted,
> > and after cataract surgery----about two years lafter a retinal
> > detachment.
> >
> What steps/precautions can be taken now to minimize the odds on the
> remaining eye?
Again, a guestion for your doctor. If you have peripheral retinal
degenerations, you may need some preventative laser work. Other than
avoiding sharp blows to the head, there is little to do to prevent RD.
Have regular retinal exams through dilated pupils and go immediately to
your doctor if you have any symptoms of RD -- flashes, floaters or loss
of vision in any part of your field. However, about 50% of RD have no
symptoms.
Dr Judy
> When I state that my recovery is going well, I also have to observe
> that I cannot see any degree of closeup detail. I can recognize shapes
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> K
Robert Kopp - 23 Jun 2006 17:02 GMT
> avoiding sharp blows to the head, there is little to do to prevent RD.
> Have regular retinal exams through dilated pupils and go immediately to
> your doctor if you have any symptoms of RD -- flashes, floaters or loss
> of vision in any part of your field. However, about 50% of RD have no
> symptoms.
Really? (One problem with this statement is that people do not seek
treatment for conditions that have no symptoms. Then how do you know?)

Signature
Robert T. Kopp
http://analytic.tripod.com
Dr Judy - 23 Jun 2006 22:28 GMT
> > avoiding sharp blows to the head, there is little to do to prevent RD.
> > Have regular retinal exams through dilated pupils and go immediately to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Really? (One problem with this statement is that people do not seek
> treatment for conditions that have no symptoms. Then how do you know?)
You know by having regular eye examinations, symptoms or no symptoms.
You are correct that many people will not seek treatment, eye or rest
of body, without symptoms. Both retinal detachment and glaucoma have
few to no symptoms yet can lead to serious vision loss. Systemically,
about 50% of type 2 diabetics are undiagnosed. Many people with
hypertension and coronary artery disease are undiagnosed and untreated.
Here in Canada, at least cost is not a deterrent to care, only patient
apathy. In the US, lack of universal health care means millions go
undiagnosed.
Dr Judy