Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

[Straw Poll] soc.support.vision-impaired

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Henrietta K Thomas - 12 Jun 2006 22:16 GMT
I've posted a Straw Poll on the Web to find out how many people will use
soc.support.vision-impaired if the group is created.

The numerical results (no names) will be incorporated into the 2nd RFD
as evidence of support for the group.

Please do not say you will use the group unless you actually intend to
use the group.

You will find the ballot at:

http://www.ckdog.co.uk/php/voting/vote.php?448dd365a8c58

Thank you for your time.

Henrietta K. Thomas
Proponent, soc.support.vision-impaired
The Real Bev - 13 Jun 2006 07:00 GMT
'Reply-To' header removed;  I want this to go to ALL the groups involved.

> I've posted a Straw Poll on the Web to find out how many people will use
> soc.support.vision-impaired if the group is created...

It may be noted that Henrietta has NO power whatsoever over the creation
of new groups and that she apparently likes to cause trouble just for
the fun of it.  This was our experience (realized only after the fact)
during the creation of the moderated group rec.skiing.alpine.moderated,
which passed by a HUGE margin.

Dealing with her was a monumental waste of time and effort.

Signature

Cheers,
Bev
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Some people are alive only because it is illegal to kill them."
                                                     -- Lionel

Henrietta K Thomas - 13 Jun 2006 09:01 GMT
>'Reply-To' header removed;  I want this to go to ALL the groups involved.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>during the creation of the moderated group rec.skiing.alpine.moderated,
>which passed by a HUGE margin.

I have news for you, Bev.  News.groups has changed.  The old system has
been dropped and a new system is rising in its place.

I am a bona fide proponent for soc.support.vision-impaired.  If you
don't believe me, go to news.groups and look up the thread RFD:
soc.support.vision-impaired.
You just might have an interest in this group regardless of how you feel
about me.

Henrietta
Bob Officer - 13 Jun 2006 09:07 GMT
>>'Reply-To' header removed;  I want this to go to ALL the groups involved.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>I have news for you, Bev.  News.groups has changed.  The old system has
>been dropped and a new system is rising in its place.

The new system is called /Calvin Ball/ by all involved...
the name is an excellent one, with constantly moving goal posts, and
rules which change in the middle of the game. Much the way Henrietta
runs the us.* hierarchy

>I am a bona fide proponent for soc.support.vision-impaired.  If you
>don't believe me, go to news.groups and look up the thread RFD:
>soc.support.vision-impaired.
>You just might have an interest in this group regardless of how you feel
>about me.

Yep.

Signature

Ak'toh'di

The Real Bev - 19 Jun 2006 04:10 GMT
> Bev <bashley101+usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I have news for you, Bev.  News.groups has changed.  The old system has
> been dropped and a new system is rising in its place.

Sheep entrails?  Each proponent sends you a little something via paypal
to ensure passage?

Signature

Cheers, Bev
===================================================
Red ship crashes into blue ship - sailors marooned.

Henrietta K Thomas - 19 Jun 2006 10:34 GMT
<...>

>> I have news for you, Bev.  News.groups has changed.  The old system has
>> been dropped and a new system is rising in its place.
>
>Sheep entrails?  Each proponent sends you a little something via paypal
>to ensure passage?

Much better than that, Bev.  There's a whole team working on the
project.  They call themselves The Big 8 Management Board.  For openers,
see Message-ID: <enhb92ddpqaf32veisbn9rctsjrck3di61@4ax.com>

TTFN

Henrietta
Proponent: soc.support.vision-impaired
The Real Bev - 20 Jun 2006 19:47 GMT
> <bashley101+usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> project.  They call themselves The Big 8 Management Board.  For openers,
> see Message-ID: <enhb92ddpqaf32veisbn9rctsjrck3di61@4ax.com>

That's very interesting.  I was unable to find a list of Board members.
 Got one?

The new system might be more efficient and less, um, violent, but I find
the general idea of ANY centralized anonymous authority disturbing.

Signature

Cheers, Bev
----------------------------------------------------------
A spokesperson for 60s band 'the animals' has today made a
public apology saying they were mistaken and there isn't a
house in New Orleans after all.

Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 20 Jun 2006 19:59 GMT
> That's very interesting.  I was unable to find a list of Board members.
>   Got one?

The very first link on the home page goes to this list:

http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:b8mb

This is linked from the phrase "Big-8 Management Board" not only
on the home page, but in other parts of the web site as well.

This is a list of pages that seem to link back to the current page.

   *      blogs:whats_new
   *      faqs:big-8_list
   *      faqs:glossary
   *      faqs:index
   *      faqs:newusers
   *      history:big-8
   *      member:mxm
   *      policies:creation
   *      policies:rmgroup_rfd
   *      start

> The new system might be more efficient and less, um, violent, but I find
> the general idea of ANY centralized anonymous authority disturbing.

If you need help understanding how to navigate the wiki, please see:

http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:navigation

Marty

--
Member of the Big-8 Management Board (B8MB), such as it is.
The B8MB is a work in progress.
See http://www.big-8.org for more information.
The Real Bev - 22 Jun 2006 00:19 GMT
> > <bashley101+usenet@gmail.com> wrote in <HoXlg.33$TW3.19@fe07.lga>:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> If you need help understanding how to navigate the wiki, please see:

Thanks, I found that later but I had posted before I finished hunting.
Gotta watch that.

Signature

Cheers,
Bev
---------------------------------------------
"The primary purpose of any government entity
 is to employ the unemployable."

Tim Skirvin - 20 Jun 2006 20:22 GMT
>> Much better than that, Bev.  There's a whole team working on the
>> project.  They call themselves The Big 8 Management Board.  For openers,
>> see Message-ID: <enhb92ddpqaf32veisbn9rctsjrck3di61@4ax.com>

> That's very interesting.  I was unable to find a list of Board members.
> Got one?

       http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=policies:membership

       There's a lot of documentation up at http://www.big-8.org/ .  

> The new system might be more efficient and less, um, violent, but I find
> the general idea of ANY centralized anonymous authority disturbing.

       Oh, trust me, we're far from anonymous...

                           - Tim Skirvin (skirv@big-8.org)
                                     Chair, Big-8 Management Board
Signature

http://www.big-8.org/                           Big-8 Management Board
http://www.killfile.org/~tskirvin/        Skirv's Homepage <FISH>< <*>

leonard78sp@gmail.com - 14 Jun 2006 17:13 GMT
> > I've posted a Straw Poll on the Web to find out how many people will use
> > soc.support.vision-impaired if the group is created...
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> during the creation of the moderated group rec.skiing.alpine.moderated,
> which passed by a HUGE margin.

Bev: While these days I am no supporter of HKT, you
chose a very bad example.

> Dealing with her was a monumental waste of time and effort.

Yes: rsam was a wasted effort.
Brian Gaff - 18 Jun 2006 23:58 GMT
>>> I've posted a Straw Poll on the Web to find out how many people
>>> will use soc.support.vision-impaired if the group is created...
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Yes: rsam was a wasted effort.

So what exactly is going on?

I'm losing the will to live in this thread!

Brian
Signature

Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 19 Jun 2006 03:09 GMT
>So what exactly is going on?

The proposal to create a new newsgroup is being discussed.

Along with that, a lot of questions about how new newsgroups are
created
are also being discussed.

Then there are various flame wars and sundry kinds of thread drift
going on.

>I'm losing the will to live in this thread!

Here's the big question: would you use soc.support.vision-impaired
if it were created?

Would you post to it?

Would you read it?

If you are opposed to creating the group, what are the grounds
of your opposition?

This note, by the way, was crossposted to:
news.groups,
alt.comp.blind-users,
alt.disability.blind.social,
alt.lasik-eyes,
sci.med.vision

                Marty
Aula - 19 Jun 2006 03:22 GMT
> Here's the big question: would you use soc.support.vision-impaired
> if it were created?

unless the charter is flawed, which it didun't appear to be on my first
blush read this afternoon.

> Would you post to it?

probably

> Would you read it?

deffinitely

> This note, by the way, was crossposted to:
> news.groups,
> alt.comp.blind-users,
> alt.disability.blind.social,
> alt.lasik-eyes,
> sci.med.vision

i suspect that there are people who have never been to those ng's who would
love to take part in the group.  finding them before the name is searchable
is problematic.  i'd not have hung out in any of them, for example, because
they have nothing to do with my particular diagnosis, which is a rather
common one.  i've met other folks with similar vision problems/diagnoses on
very diverse fora such as rev.needlework.sewing [iirc] and parenting fora.
it may take a while to get the word out, but i believe the need is there and
the users would arrive given propagation.  might start slow, but would be
helpful to folk like me.

oh, and please pardon the typing but i'm 1-handed these days while
recovering from rotator cuff repair and i'm just not doing caps.

-aula
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 19 Jun 2006 14:45 GMT
> i suspect that there are people who have never been to those ng's who would
> love to take part in the group.  finding them before the name is searchable
> is problematic.

Yes.  Getting new users to Usenet is not easy.  There are hurdles
involved that don't apply to other kinds of forums.

> ... i believe the need is there and
> the users would arrive given propagation.  might start slow, but would be
> helpful to folk like me.

As a general rule, it seems to me that a group needs a nucleus of
supporters committed to it BEFORE it is created.  Otherwise, there
won't be much for newcomers to read if and when they happen to stumble
across the new group.

> oh, and please pardon the typing but i'm 1-handed these days while
> recovering from rotator cuff repair and i'm just not doing caps.

Thanks for the feedback.  I hope you heal soon.  I've put my mouse
under my
keyboard (the keyboard is on a plank propped up on bricks) because I
was getting murderous shoulder pain from stretching to reach the mouse
all day long.

Marty

--
Member of the Big-8 Management Board (B8MB), such as it is.
The B8MB is a work in progress.
See http://www.big-8.org for more information.
Aula - 19 Jun 2006 22:37 GMT
> As a general rule, it seems to me that a group needs a nucleus of
> supporters committed to it BEFORE it is created.  Otherwise, there
> won't be much for newcomers to read if and when they happen to stumble
> across the new group.

i tend to agree.  since, however, this proposal is at least floated it bears
addressing and attempting to garner that nucleous to see what can be done.
I wonder if anyone has shouted out the diabetes forums as well as those
where vision problems can accompany that which the group is designed to
serve?

> Thanks for the feedback.  I hope you heal soon.  I've put my mouse
> under my
> keyboard (the keyboard is on a plank propped up on bricks) because I
> was getting murderous shoulder pain from stretching to reach the mouse
> all day long.

Thanks.  Working on the healing part.  I have found, btw, that an optical
wireless mouse does wonders for the wrist and shoulder discomforts, as does
setting up work and home computers to use opposite arms.  I've been doing
the latter for several years, which has helped [we don't know why i
developed the rotator cuff tear, but it was not believed to be primarily due
to computer use].

-Aula
serebel - 20 Jun 2006 01:40 GMT
For all the people whining that the new forum won't be started, why
don't you just start your own forum?
Peter J Ross - 20 Jun 2006 05:10 GMT
> For all the people whining that the new forum won't be started, why
> don't you just start your own forum?

"@aol.com"

PJR :-)
Signature

 _  _(o)_(o)_  _       Tired of the same old posters in your
._\`:_ F S M _:' \_,    newsgroup? Why not visit news.groups.reviews
   / (`---'\ `-.       and attract new talent by posting a review?
,-`  _)    (_,   F_P   (Please read the posting guidelines.)

Dana - 17 Jul 2006 09:32 GMT
At least this keeps the news group active, LOL.

> For all the people whining that the new forum won't be started, why
> don't you just start your own forum?
The Real Bev - 20 Jun 2006 19:57 GMT
> Thanks for the feedback.  I hope you heal soon.  I've put my mouse
> under my keyboard (the keyboard is on a plank propped up on bricks)
> because I was getting murderous shoulder pain from stretching to
> reach the mouse all day long.

Consider a lapdesk:  a flat surface (12"x18" perhaps) with a lightweight
beanbag-like understructure.  My mom doesn't have room for a mouse at
the side of the keyboard, and the lapdesk works fine.

> -- Member of the Big-8 Management Board (B8MB), such as it is. The
> B8MB is a work in progress. See http://www.big-8.org for more
> information.

Sounds like either pain or fun.  Hope it works out well -- the creation
of rec.sking.alpine.moderated was LOTS more pain than fun.

Signature

Cheers,
Bev
===============================================
     Salesmen welcome -- dog food is expensive

The Real Bev - 20 Jun 2006 19:59 GMT
> Thanks for the feedback.  I hope you heal soon.  I've put my mouse
> under my keyboard (the keyboard is on a plank propped up on bricks)
> because I was getting murderous shoulder pain from stretching to
> reach the mouse all day long.

Consider a lapdesk:  a flat surface (12"x18" perhaps) with a lightweight
beanbag-like understructure.  My mom doesn't have room for a mouse at
the side of the keyboard, and the lapdesk works fine.

> -- Member of the Big-8 Management Board (B8MB), such as it is. The
> B8MB is a work in progress. See http://www.big-8.org for more
> information.

Sounds like either pain or fun.  Hope it works out well -- the creation
of rec.sking.alpine.moderated was LOTS more pain than fun.

Signature

Cheers,
Bev
===================================================
     Salesmen welcome -- dog food is expensive

Brian Gaff - 19 Jun 2006 09:22 GMT
>> So what exactly is going on?
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Marty

Signature

Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Strange, as the biggest useage blind group is the blind-use5rs one, and I've
only seen a couple of people post there.

Personally, I'd like to see a support group, but that very much depends on
how its charter is interpreted, and what constitutes support I suppose.

Brian

Brian Gaff - 19 Jun 2006 10:34 GMT
>>> So what exactly is going on?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>>
>> Marty
What I was trying to say was that I cannot see this thread over on that
group.

Brian
Signature

Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 19 Jun 2006 14:50 GMT
> What I was trying to say was that I cannot see this thread over on that
> group.

It probably was not crossposted there in its earlier incarnation.

If you want to review the whole thread--and many associated
threads--you can
Google newsgroups:

http://groups.google.com/group/news.groups?hl=en

Or here is a Google search of news.groups for the phrase
"vision-impaired":

<http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=10&scoring=r&hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_e
q=&as_ugroup=news.groups&as_usubject=vision-impaired&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q&
as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=19&as_maxm=6&as_maxy=2006&safe=
off
>

Here is a tiny url to that same link:

http://tinyurl.com/qzue9

Marty

--
Member of the Big-8 Management Board (B8MB), such as it is.
The B8MB is a work in progress.
See http://www.big-8.org for more information.
Dana - 17 Jul 2006 09:29 GMT
Where did this nut come from anyway?
The Real Bev - 19 Jun 2006 04:05 GMT
>>>> I've posted a Straw Poll on the Web to find out how many people
>>>> will use soc.support.vision-impaired if the group is created...
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> So what exactly is going on?

Short version:  rsam was created to avoid the 5-year rantings of a loon.
 In the loon's absence, the moderated group has languished.  Since we
hadn't a clue about how to start a moderated group, we stumbled around
in the dark for a long time.  HKS was kind enough to stick out her foot
and trip us every once in a while.

> I'm losing the will to live in this thread!

Isn't there an alt.suicide group?  If not, start one.  Way simple.

Signature

Cheers, Bev
===================================================
Red ship crashes into blue ship - sailors marooned.

serebel - 19 Jun 2006 04:08 GMT
> Isn't there an alt.suicide group?  If not, start one.  Way simple.

 Would that be before or after? :)
The Real Bev - 19 Jun 2006 04:33 GMT
>> Isn't there an alt.suicide group?  If not, start one.  Way simple.
>
>   Would that be before or after? :)

Doesn't common knowledge indicate that people who talk about it don't do it?

Signature

Cheers, Bev
===================================================
Red ship crashes into blue ship - sailors marooned.

Doug Freyburger - 19 Jun 2006 17:28 GMT
> >>> This was our experience (realized
> >>> only after the fact) during the creation of the moderated group
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Short version:  rsam was created to avoid the 5-year rantings of a loon.
>   In the loon's absence, the moderated group has languished.

To me that sounds like the effort worked.  What does it matter which
group ended up flourishing?  Creation of a moderated version led to
the loon going away.  Availability of a bomb shelter was enough that
use of the bomb shelter wasn't needed.
The Real Bev - 20 Jun 2006 07:07 GMT
>> >>> This was our experience (realized
>> >>> only after the fact) during the creation of the moderated group
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> To me that sounds like the effort worked.  What does it matter which
> group ended up flourishing?  

Yes, sort of.  I would never encourage anyone to start a moderated group
for such a trivial purpose, though.  Even if you have one, you still
have to find a willing site to serve as an injection point, which
usually costs SOMEBODY money.

> Creation of a moderated version led to
> the loon going away.  

Would that it were that simple!  Real loons never go away.  He comes
back every few months or so with the same old rants he's made since --
are you ready for this? -- 1999.

> Availability of a bomb shelter was enough that
> use of the bomb shelter wasn't needed.

Sort of like keeping a spare fuel pump in your trunk.

Signature

Cheers, Bev
=========================================================
"I believe that forgiving [terrorists] is God's function.
 Our job is to arrange the meeting."
                                    - Norman Schwartzkopf

Johnny Winther Ronnenberg - 22 Jun 2006 20:38 GMT
> So what exactly is going on?

An admin flamewar ;-(

> I'm losing the will to live in this thread!

Dont there are no reason for that, Just let them have their litle batle on
egos and they go away and forget about it all ;-) Look at it this way, they
create trafic in this group, that justify that ISP's keep it alive ;-)

Best regards
Johnny Winther Ronnenberg
Signature

Det er brugeren der bestemmer ;-) http://www.webtilgængelighed.dk (på
dansk) = http://www.webaccessibility.dk (in english) Last: revision:
http://www.webaccessibility.dk/webaccessibility/userutilities/dublincore.htm
and http://www.webtilgængelighed.dk/webaccessibility/upcomingwork.asp

The Real Bev - 19 Jun 2006 04:02 GMT
>> > I've posted a Straw Poll on the Web to find out how many people will use
>> > soc.support.vision-impaired if the group is created...
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Bev: While these days I am no supporter of HKT, you
> chose a very bad example.

No, an excellent one.  The bitch acted like she actually had some
authority so we -- hopeless novices at the game -- took her seriously.
It would have been a kindness for the REAL persons in authority to have
indicated that she and her co-a.shole whose name I have forgotten were
just there to cause trouble, but it didn't happen.

>> Dealing with her was a monumental waste of time and effort.
>
> Yes: rsam was a wasted effort.

It served its purpose.  Suzieflame started the process just for a lark
and to cause trouble.  We would have been better to ignore him/her/it
and go on our own as had been discussed previously for over a year.
It's unfortunate that the experience you gain in an endeavor frequently
convinces you that you never want to do THAT again even if you do know
how to do it now.

If the bitch is blind, it's no worse than she deserves.

Signature

Cheers, Bev
===================================================
Red ship crashes into blue ship - sailors marooned.

L. - 19 Jun 2006 07:52 GMT
> If the bitch is blind, it's no worse than she deserves.
>
> --
> Cheers, Bev

Ya know, I and a whole lot of others don't give a sh.t about your
stupid pissing wars.  But to say something like this about anyone is
just pure evil.  God forbid you should ever lose your eyesight.  And
thanks to a.sholes like you the group vote was negative, which is a
shame because a lot of vision-impaired people need a group like this.

Jerks.

-L.
Aula - 19 Jun 2006 11:00 GMT
> Ya know, I and a whole lot of others don't give a sh.t about your
> stupid pissing wars.  But to say something like this about anyone is
> just pure evil.  God forbid you should ever lose your eyesight.  And
> thanks to a.sholes like you the group vote was negative, which is a
> shame because a lot of vision-impaired people need a group like this.

could you please explain what vote you are referencing?  i thought it had
not gone to  CFV yet?  did i miss something scanning through this very
active group?

-aula
Jayne Kulikauskas - 19 Jun 2006 11:36 GMT
>> Ya know, I and a whole lot of others don't give a sh.t about your
>> stupid pissing wars.  But to say something like this about anyone is
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>-aula

There was an interest poll that have very low turnout.  I suspect it
is a reference to that.

--
Jayne

Proponent for soc.men.moderated

Link to the poll:
http://www.ckdog.co.uk/php/voting/vote.php?449256720e9cc

If you haven't read the proposal yet, then please see the 1st RFD:
http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=nan:2006-06-05-men-rfd
L. - 20 Jun 2006 09:41 GMT
> There was an interest poll that have very low turnout.  I suspect it
> is a reference to that.

Correct.  It closed on the 16th.

-L.
Aula - 20 Jun 2006 10:57 GMT
> > There was an interest poll that have very low turnout.  I suspect it
> > is a reference to that.
>
> Correct.  It closed on the 16th.

and this means what?

-aula
Jayne Kulikauskas - 20 Jun 2006 13:58 GMT
>> > There was an interest poll that have very low turnout.  I suspect it
>> > is a reference to that.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>-aula

That is a good question.  I'm not sure about the answer.  It isn't
like a CFV where there was a known formula for interpretting it.  As I
understand it, the poll is one way to determine if there is sufficient
interest to create the group.  It is one of the pieces of information
that the Board will use to make their decision about creating the
group.  Since a bunch of people turned up expressing interest after
the poll was over, I'd expect them to weigh that in their decision
too.  

Jayne
Martin X. Moleski, SJ - 20 Jun 2006 15:48 GMT
> ...  It isn't
>like a CFV where there was a known formula for interpretting it.  As I
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>the poll was over, I'd expect them to weigh that in their decision
>too.

Yes.

Proponents should keep track of everyone who has expressed
interest in using the new group.

A list of such posters with a message-ID for the positive
posts would become part of the "Traffic Analysis" for
the proposed group.

                Marty

--
Member of the Big-8 Management Board (B8MB), such as it is.
The B8MB is a work in progress.
See http://www.big-8.org for more information.
Henrietta K Thomas - 23 Jun 2006 00:54 GMT
>> Ya know, I and a whole lot of others don't give a sh.t about your
>> stupid pissing wars.  But to say something like this about anyone is
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>not gone to  CFV yet?  did i miss something scanning through this very
>active group?

The Big 8 is under new management (The Big-8 Management Board) and CFVs
have been suspended until further notice.  The vote "L" is referring to
is a Straw Poll I took regarding soc.support.vision-impaired.  The Real
Bev urged people to ignore it, and "L" suspects that adversely affected
the result.  There is no way of knowing for sure.

Hope this helps.

Henrietta K. Thomas
    Proponent, soc.support.vision-impaired
The Real Bev - 20 Jun 2006 07:16 GMT
>> If the bitch is blind, it's no worse than she deserves.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> thanks to a.sholes like you the group vote was negative, which is a
> shame because a lot of vision-impaired people need a group like this.

Then vote for it.  I will too if it will help.  Nothing at all against
the group, just one particular a.shole.

Signature

Cheers, Bev
=========================================================
"I believe that forgiving [terrorists] is God's function.
 Our job is to arrange the meeting."
                                    - Norman Schwartzkopf

Johnny Winther Ronnenberg - 22 Jun 2006 20:53 GMT
> If the bitch is blind, it's no worse than she deserves.

And what kind of disgusting a.shole are you to send a comment like that to
several groups for / about VI's?

Its god dam disgusting!!!!!

No regards
Johnny Winther Ronnenberg
Signature

Det er brugeren der bestemmer ;-) http://www.webtilgængelighed.dk (på
dansk) = http://www.webaccessibility.dk (in english) Last: revision:
http://www.webaccessibility.dk/webaccessibility/userutilities/dublincore.htm
and http://www.webtilgængelighed.dk/webaccessibility/upcomingwork.asp

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.