Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Progressive lenses such as Varilux

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
quincy451@yahoo.com - 30 May 2006 01:16 GMT
Ok I have worn glasses for over 30 years.  I have single lense -6.5
diopter lenses.  I was wondering what the pricing might be like for
progressive lenses like the varilux.  My perscription is stable but my
near sighted vesion is bad.  I take off my glasses to and read most
things better without glasses.   Not in love with the bi-focal concept.

Thanks for any comments,
David
Mark A - 30 May 2006 01:23 GMT
> Ok I have worn glasses for over 30 years.  I have single lense -6.5
> diopter lenses.  I was wondering what the pricing might be like for
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Thanks for any comments,
> David

It depends on many factors such as the model (Comfort, Panamic, Liberty,
etc), the lens material (CR-39, polycarb, 1.60, 1.67, etc), and where you
purchase it.  But expect to pay an average of $300 for a pair of Varilux
brand progressive lenses (frames are obviously extra).
Anon E. Muss - 30 May 2006 04:57 GMT
>Ok I have worn glasses for over 30 years.  I have single lense -6.5
>diopter lenses.  I was wondering what the pricing might be like for
>progressive lenses like the varilux.

In my area, Varilux progressive lenses in standard plastic (CR-39)
start around $200.00 and go up from there.

>My perscription is stable but my near sighted vesion is bad.  I take
>off my glasses to and read most things better without glasses.   Not
>in love with the bi-focal concept.

Does it bother you "a lot" to have to take your glasses off to read?

If not, taking your glasses off when you want to read may be the best
thing for you.  In fact, a lot of my patients do just that and never
go to bifocals.

Progressives/bifocals for "someone like you" (i.e., nearsighted) is
more for people who want to be able to read without having to take
their glasses off.

>Thanks for any comments,

If you are a -6.50D myope, your lenses are, and will continue to be,
thick if made in standard plastic.  I would suggest looking into
having them made in high-index plastic, keeping the frame relatively
small with as close to a round shape and eyes centered in the frame as
possible.  As far as high-index in concerned, I normally recommend
1.67 or (recently) 1.74 with a high-quality anti-reflective coating.

Be also aware that for many people it takes some time to learn how to
use a bifocal or progressive lens.  Don't expect to put it on and for
it to instantly feel perfect or natural anymore than you would expect
to pick up a guitar for the first time and feel perfectly comfortable
playing beautiful music (but many do!).

These are things your eye doctor or dispensing optician should discuss
with you.
quincy451@yahoo.com - 30 May 2006 08:12 GMT
Ok I got an idea of the cost now.  Sounds like the recommendation might
be against progressives.  I know there will be an adjustment period.  I
have also heard that when you look away at something you need to turn
your head and not your eyes.    I have smaller frames and plastic
lenses.  Not sure if they are high-index or not.  But one of the big
problems I have with them is they have this white haze that never comes
off no matter what they are cleaned with.

What I was looking to do is:
get rid of the white haze.
get glasses that would help me focus better than what I have.

I am a computer programmer.  So I spend long hours in front of a
computer.  Other than that, my life is normal, driving, tv, movies,
etc.  

Am I wasting my money on the idea of progressives,
David
Anon E. Muss - 30 May 2006 15:05 GMT
>Ok I got an idea of the cost now.  Sounds like the recommendation might
>be against progressives.  I know there will be an adjustment period.  I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>problems I have with them is they have this white haze that never comes
>off no matter what they are cleaned with.

Did they ALWAYS have this white haze?

That could be scratched up lenses, scratched up hard coat (used on
many hi index lenses) or (more likely) a scratched up anti-reflective
coating.

If you are "rough" on your glasses -- which really means you don't
clean them 99% of the time using an unscented KLEENEX and liberal
amounts of lens cleaner -- then an anti-reflective coating isn't for
you.

Glasses that have an anti-reflective coating need to be treated the
same way you would treat an expensive camera lens -- i.e., don't clean
them on your shirt, don't use WINDEX, don't use a KLEENEX on dry
lenses.

>What I was looking to do is:
>get rid of the white haze.

Get new lenses.

>get glasses that would help me focus better than what I have.

Are your "focusing" problems at distance, near or somewhere in
between?

>I am a computer programmer.  So I spend long hours in front of a
>computer.  Other than that, my life is normal, driving, tv, movies,
>etc.  

For people who spend long hours in front of a computer, a pair
exclusively for computer use -- optimized for your work distances and
enviornment are optimal.  For people < 40 years old, many times their
"everyday" glasses are adequate.  For people >40, a pair of "VDT"
glasses are sometimes mandatory to obtain the most comfortable,
effortless and clear vision.

>Am I wasting my money on the idea of progressives,

For people who want/need to be able to read with their glasses on, I
almost always recommend a progressive.  For most people, I think it's
the best type of multifocal lens.

As far as wasting money, he more it "really bothers you" to have to
take your glasses off to read, the more likely you are NOT wasting
your money on progressives.

One big recipe for failure is for an eye doctor to prescribe
progressives for someone who has no real near complaints -- IOW,
someone who takes their glasses off to read and who absolutely does
not mind doing so.
quincy451@yahoo.com - 30 May 2006 21:05 GMT
always have the white haze.  No.  As a matter of fact I have a second
pair I bought at the same time and never wore.  They do not have have
the white haze.  But alas I have taken the nose pad off them to fix
these once.  So they do not sit right on my face.  So I can't just
switch to them.  I could take the nose pad off these and put it back on
them.

Hard on them.  Not really.  For the first couple years I used nothing
but the glass cleaner rags and cleaner the glasses retailer gave me.
They where running a special 2 for 1 on glasses and gave us 4 boxes of
cleaner and rags.  We still have lots of this cleaner.

Might avoid an anti reflective coating next time, to keep the white
haze from coming back.

Fucus problem is mostly near.  I am 41.

Can someone explain simply how progressives work and what they will do
and not do well.
Thanks,
David
Mark A - 30 May 2006 21:55 GMT
> always have the white haze.  No.  As a matter of fact I have a second
> pair I bought at the same time and never wore.  They do not have have
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Thanks,
> David

If you get AR coating, I would recommend a premium coating like Crizal that
much tougher than most.

Yes, you usually can switch nose pads, but there is usually a piece that
holds the nose pad that is not removable, and may have been bent to fit the
frame on your face properly. Almost every optical store that I know of will
change the nose pads for free, and many will do it even it you bought your
lenses somewhere else. They will also adjust the pads on your second pair,
if you want to try that first. Lencrafters is very good about this kind of
free service (even though I think their lens products are very mediocre).
quincy451@yahoo.com - 31 May 2006 01:41 GMT
Pad replacement:
Yea I replaced the pads myself.  It took about two hours of getting the
tiny screws out and in.
Turns out it was a mistake.  My wife had the same problem a month later
without the
spare glasses to pull parts from.  They did hers for free in about 15
minutes.

Yea I got these glasses at eyemasters.  I have gotten glasses at
lenscrafters before but
they where too expensive for what you got.  With these I have no
problem with what I got.
I mean I got two pairs of glasses for myself two pairs for the wife one
regular and one
sunglass pair for about $600 4 years ago.  Definately time for
something new.

David

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.