Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

best surevue replacement

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
erikred@hotmail.com - 21 May 2006 03:21 GMT
It is becoming harder and harder to get surevue lenses (discontinued),
although there is still plenty of places that advertise them.

I'm looking for suggestions for replacements. I don't like
accuvue/advance.
They break in no time and are much thinner. I'm basically looking
for a reaonably common brand which has the same or similar material,
sizes
and thickness as Surevue.

Would one of the regulars (Dr. Larry?) care to make a suggestion?
CatmanX - 21 May 2006 04:10 GMT
Acuvue advance, ahich has replaced surevue. Any other lens would work
also.

grant
Neil Brooks - 21 May 2006 04:21 GMT
>Would one of the regulars (Dr. Larry?) care to make a suggestion?

Dude, your stock is WAY up these days ;-)

We need s.m.v. trading cards.....

(I can hear it now "Awwww.  You got an Otis.  Too bad.")
LarryDoc - 21 May 2006 20:55 GMT
> >Would one of the regulars (Dr. Larry?) care to make a suggestion?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> (I can hear it now "Awwww.  You got an Otis.  Too bad.")

<BG> I am, in fact, rolling on the floor.  Nah......my puppy would eat
my laptop.

I've got to unleash the kill file so I can see what Otis, et al are up
to.  Or not.

Meanwhile, to answer to query:

Surevue is a 1970's lens.  Thick, low oxygen, old, ancient technology.  
Still using a rotary telephone?  Time to move on, buddy.  See your eye
care practitioner for a refit.  Try something from this century, or at
least the last decade.  Try a few lenses---I'm certain you'll find
something that suits your needs and perhaps vastly improves your contact
lens experience.

LB, O.D.
Dom - 21 May 2006 09:58 GMT
> It is becoming harder and harder to get surevue lenses (discontinued),
> although there is still plenty of places that advertise them.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Would one of the regulars (Dr. Larry?) care to make a suggestion?

Well I'm a semi-regular here so hopefully that qualifies me to answer
your query.

You don't want the same thickness and material as Surevue - because it's
 an old material and unnecessarily thick (poor oxygen transmission).

As a replacement I'd suggest O2Optix. It's comfortable, easy to handle,
has great oxygen transmission, and pricing should be similar.

Dom
erikred@hotmail.com - 21 May 2006 18:33 GMT
Thanks, Dom.

Does "easy to handle" imply that  O2Optix is as rugged as Surevue?

This is the main quality I am looking for,  apart from the usual
comfort and
health considerations, of course. I have had very good experience with
surevue,
and I take the lenses out every night.
doctor_my_eye@msn.com - 21 May 2006 21:19 GMT
Why is "rugged" an admirable quality in a medical device that sits on
your eye?  Do  you dry them out to make small ashtrays or hummingbird
feeders?  "Rugged" is for tires, not medical devices.  Wear each lens
14 times, throw it away.  Rub each surface gently before inserting in
the case.  Where does the "rugged" part come?  "Rugged" could be a
codeword for "Lenses that I can overwear and keep for months."  Condoms
need to be rugged.  Contacts do not.
Quick - 21 May 2006 21:52 GMT
> Why is "rugged" an admirable quality in a medical device
> that sits on your eye?  Do  you dry them out to make
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> overwear and keep for months."  Condoms need to be
> rugged.  Contacts do not.

ummm, well, for the extremely brief period (1 month?) that
I tried soft contacts I tore or cracked a bunch of them. Granted
I was not extremely adept at removing them but I can imagine
many others might not get much better at it than I was. Things
like the Acuvues are extremely flimsy and hard to handle
(although the most comfortable ones I tried). The Ciba's and
Cooper's were much more "rugged" and easier to handle.

-Quick
Dan Abel - 22 May 2006 00:16 GMT
> ummm, well, for the extremely brief period (1 month?) that
> I tried soft contacts I tore or cracked a bunch of them. Granted
> I was not extremely adept at removing them but I can imagine

I had a little problem with this.  My OD explained that folding the
contact flat (in half) would cause it to eventually (really soon) tear.  
It's like any plastic or metal.  I was doing this during cleaning.  Once
I stopped doing this, I no longer had any torn contacts.

Signature

Dan Abel
dabel@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA

Quick - 22 May 2006 00:43 GMT
> In article
>  <%p4cg.13262$fb2.199@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> metal.  I was doing this during cleaning.  Once I stopped
> doing this, I no longer had any torn contacts.

Yea, I was aware of that and I wasn't doing it intentionally.
The things were so flimsy they would invert and suction
onto my finger, fold over flat by themselves when I was
trying to determine if they were inside out in my palm,
fold flat when I was removing them using the pinch
technique (yes I only "pinched" from the very edges
starting on my eyeball on either side of the contacts),
etc., etc. The CIBA's and Cooper's were thicker, stiffer,
much easier to handle and I destroyed them much less
frequently.  Fortunately I was on my way to RGPs. These
are extremely "rugged" in that sense and very much to
my liking.

-Quick
Dom - 22 May 2006 10:52 GMT
> Thanks, Dom.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> surevue,
> and I take the lenses out every night.

If by 'rugged' you mean 'not thin & flimsy' then O2Optix are rugged.
They're not the only good lens out there but they are one of the few
best currently available in my opinion.

Other options to consider are daily disposables, which don't need
cleaning or disinfection and so are extremely hygienic and convenient.

Dom
Anon E. Muss - 22 May 2006 23:19 GMT
>It is becoming harder and harder to get surevue lenses (discontinued),
>although there is still plenty of places that advertise them.
>
>I'm looking for suggestions for replacements. I don't like
>accuvue/advance.
>They break in no time and are much thinner.

How long, on average, does it take them to break?

>I'm basically looking for a reaonably common brand which has the same
>or similar material, sizesand thickness as Surevue.

Any of the standard HEMA lenses are pretty comparable.  Something like
CooperVision's Frequency 38, Ocular Science Hydrogenics 38, or a
Bausch & Lomb Optima 38 are pretty similar to a Surevue.

>Would one of the regulars (Dr. Larry?) care to make a suggestion?

Standard HEMA soft contact lenses are almost never a first-choice lens
that I prescribe anymore, but they still do have niche place in my
office for certain patients.

I, like many of my colleagues, have switched to silicone hydrogels, as
my soft lens material of choice.  I fit all new patients, with rare
exceptions, in them and recommend all current patients switch to them.
They are "that much" better.

I would inquire if your eye doctor would try some of the other
silicone hydrogel contact lenses that you have NOT tried, such as CIBA
O2Optix or B&L PureVision.
erikred@hotmail.com - 02 Jun 2006 06:53 GMT
Hi again to all,

I just wanted to thank everyone that offered advice and experiences in
response to my question. I think my eye care provider tends to
prescribe J&J, and it was very helpful to hear about some of the
alternatives.

A last word about ruggedness: Just as ruggedness can be doublespeak for
over-wearable,
comfortable can be marketing doublespeak for "flimsy and hence good for
business".
My experience with Accuvue Advance is that they would quite often
develop nicks and tears
within 1-2 days, and that is in my opinion not good enough for a 7day
lens.

Erik Red
Dr. Leukoma - 02 Jun 2006 13:14 GMT
> A last word about ruggedness: Just as ruggedness can be doublespeak for
> over-wearable,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> within 1-2 days, and that is in my opinion not good enough for a 7day
> lens.

As one who fits and sells contact lenses of all types, I have not seen
any evidence that the Acuvue Advance has an abnormally high failure
rate, and could not disagree more with your statement.  In stating
this, let me also say that it is not typically my lens of first choice
for completely different reasons, nor do I have any financial incentive
to defend Acuvue lenses.  While comfort and durability are not mutually
exclusive qualities, they sometimes are.  For example, thinner lenses
are usually more comfortable, but they also tend to tear more easily.
The Acuvue Advance is not a particularly thin lens, but has a thinned
edge.

Rather than blaming the product in this case, you might examine your
handling technique.

DrG
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.