A quick Google and it looks like there are almost more lawyers chasing this
than affected patients:
http://www.weitzlux.com/contactlenssolutionlawsuit/bausch-lomb-renu_402815.html
http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/renu_contact_solution/
http://www.lawyerattorneysearch.com/Renu-Moistureloc/Lawyer-Attorney.cfm
http://www.jrlawfirm.com/product_liability/renu_contact_lens_solution_lawyer.htm
http://injury-law.freeadvice.com/drug-toxic_chemicals/renu-moistureloc.htm
http://www.fightingforyou.com/renu-contact-solution-c-340.html
http://www.flainjurylawyer.com/firminthenews.php?id=38
The above is but a small selection.
To date, testing does not appear to show any problems with the solution
itself: even opened bottles recovered from affected patients were
efficacious. Also, the asian infections were of a different genotype to the
US infections, so a point source is unlikely.
One interesting comment I did hear is CDC have no data as to the typical
background rates of fusarium infections, which makes this investigation very
tricky.
> It seems that there is a concern about the Bausch and Lomb eye contact
> solution ReNu causing bacterial eye infections. These infections can be
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> kr0
The Real Bev - 29 Apr 2006 03:56 GMT
> A quick Google and it looks like there are almost more lawyers
> chasing this than affected patients:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> typical background rates of fusarium infections, which makes this
> investigation very tricky.
Not to worry, I'm sure the lawyers will sort it all out.

Signature
Cheers, Bev
------------------------------------------------------
Q: How many lawyers does it take to grease a combine?
A: One, if you feed him in real slow.