Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Trifocal segment powers & distances

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
nospam@everest.net - 24 Apr 2006 20:01 GMT
I've never seen the diopters of power for the middle segment written
on any of my trifocal prescriptions.  So I'm assuming that the middle
segment power is derived from the upper and lower segment power
somehow.

My current prescription is +1.50 sphere, with a 2.25 add.  I'm
guessing that the lower segment would be 3.75 diopters.  But what
would the power of the middle segment be if it's not written on the
prescription?

Also, is there a "typical" in focus distance they're trying to achieve
with each of the 2 lower segments, and if so, what is the typical
distance for each?
William Stacy - 24 Apr 2006 21:06 GMT
Typical intermediate add is 1/2 the near add, or in your case +1.125 add
or total +2.875.    However, some tri's are avail. with different
intermediate adds of 40%, 60% of the total add. I rarely need them, but
have used them.

w.stacy, o.d.

> I've never seen the diopters of power for the middle segment written
> on any of my trifocal prescriptions.  So I'm assuming that the middle
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> with each of the 2 lower segments, and if so, what is the typical
> distance for each?
William Stacy - 24 Apr 2006 21:10 GMT
+2.625 just in case anybody is paying attention...

> Typical intermediate add is 1/2 the near add, or in your case +1.125 add
> or total +2.875.    However, some tri's are avail. with different
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>> with each of the 2 lower segments, and if so, what is the typical
>> distance for each?
nospam@everest.net - 25 Apr 2006 22:28 GMT
Thanks.  

Is there a "typical" in focus distance they're trying to achieve with
each of the 2 lower segments, and if so, what is the typical distance
for each?

In other words, is there a certain number of inches away you should
be from an object when viewing it through the reading segment and
about how far for the middle segment?

Obviously there are cases where you might want to deviate from that,
but I just wondered if there was a rule of thumb involved.

>+2.625 just in case anybody is paying attention...
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>> with each of the 2 lower segments, and if so, what is the typical
>>> distance for each?
Mike Tyner - 25 Apr 2006 22:57 GMT
> Is there a "typical" in focus distance they're trying to achieve with
> each of the 2 lower segments, and if so, what is the typical distance
> for each?

The "typical" distance has to be tempered for each individual.

If you have to pick one, we might assume 18".

If the near add is set for 18", the intermediate add should be clearest at
double that (50% power) i.e. 36".

-MT
Quick - 24 Apr 2006 21:51 GMT
Doesn't have much to do with this but the Tangent Streak
trifocal RGP contacts allow one to specify the add in the
center segment independently (with the restriction that
each segment has to be at least .75 difference).

-Quick

> Typical intermediate add is 1/2 the near add, or in your
> case +1.125 add or total +2.875.    However, some tri's
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>> trying to achieve with each of the 2 lower segments, and
>> if so, what is the typical distance for each?
Dom - 27 Apr 2006 13:49 GMT
> I've never seen the diopters of power for the middle segment written
> on any of my trifocal prescriptions.  So I'm assuming that the middle
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> with each of the 2 lower segments, and if so, what is the typical
> distance for each?

The 'typical' distance, as Mike Tyner said, is different for each
individual. I always say to my presbyopic patients that the most
important single question in their eye test is, "where do you want to be
able to hold things to read?". The preferred reading posture leads to
the power of the reading segment. There are guidelines and averages but
everyone is different.

Once you work out the power for the lower segment, the middle segment
just 'takes care of itself'.

Dom
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.