Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Prescription increase

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Anna - 24 Apr 2006 05:50 GMT
This weekend I had an eye test that showed my prescription needs to be
changed from -2.25 left and right eyes to -2.25 left and -3 right.

My question is this – till now I have worn glasses just part time but this
seems a strong prescription for my right eye, will part time still be an
option for me?
gargi.cal@gmail.com - 24 Apr 2006 06:51 GMT
Hi Anna, you  didnt write in details that how much  vision you had in
your each eyes before thisnew glasses, & after how  long you are
changing  your new glass?  I am Gargi, Orthoptist,  you can  mail me  (
gargi.cal@gmail.com)  for any type of information regarding youreyes,
                              Thanks,
> This weekend I had an eye test that showed my prescription needs to be
> changed from -2.25 left and right eyes to -2.25 left and -3 right.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Message posted via MedKB.com
> http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/vision/200604/1
drfrank21@gmail.com - 24 Apr 2006 17:08 GMT
> This weekend I had an eye test that showed my prescription needs to be
> changed from -2.25 left and right eyes to -2.25 left and -3 right.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Message posted via MedKB.com
> http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/vision/200604/1

If you still don't get any headaches (or are not squinting) by wearing
your
new glasses just part-time, stay with it. Most of my patients over
-2.00 d
usually wear their gl's (or cl's) fulltime. Going from -2.25 to -3.00
(right eye) is a
pretty good change though.

frank
Mr S - 24 Apr 2006 19:20 GMT
>> This weekend I had an eye test that showed my prescription needs to be
>> changed from -2.25 left and right eyes to -2.25 left and -3 right.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>(right eye) is a
>pretty good change though.
Won't a 3/4 diopter difference between the prescription make going without
glasses rather uncomfortable for her?  She might see not too badly, in a
getting by sense of the word, in relative terms, but not comfortably I
wouldn't think ....
drfrank21@gmail.com - 24 Apr 2006 20:18 GMT
>> Won't a 3/4 diopter difference between the prescription make going without
> glasses rather uncomfortable for her?  She might see not too badly, in a
> getting by sense of the word, in relative terms, but not comfortably I
> wouldn't think ....
>
> --

The .75 d aniso (ansiometropia= refractive difference between the two
eyes)
may not be a problem especially if the person is used to wearing their
gl's
just part time. Some people are not visually sensitive, that is, being
uncorrected/undercorrected does not give any symptoms whereas some
individuals go nuts over a .25 d change.

frank
Astrid - 24 Apr 2006 21:56 GMT
>>> Won't a 3/4 diopter difference between the prescription make going without
>> glasses rather uncomfortable for her?  She might see not too badly, in a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>frank
I am a contacts wearer with -2.25 and -2.75 and do find the difference
uncomfortable  if not with glasses. But I am thinking that one eye may need
an upgrade in prescription - maybe that's the reason?  Or would you just
describe me as 'visually sensitive'?
drfrank21@gmail.com - 25 Apr 2006 00:34 GMT
> I am a contacts wearer with -2.25 and -2.75 and do find the difference
> uncomfortable  if not with glasses. But I am thinking that one eye may need
> an upgrade in prescription - maybe that's the reason?  Or would you just
> describe me as 'visually sensitive'?
>
> --

Most people over -2.00 d  are uncomfortable not wearing a correction
for distance. So it's the actual amount, more than the aniso, IMO,
that makes it uncomfortable for you not wearing your cl's
or gl's.

frank
Pan - 26 Apr 2006 20:29 GMT
>> I am a contacts wearer with -2.25 and -2.75 and do find the difference
>> uncomfortable  if not with glasses. But I am thinking that one eye may need
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>frank

Dr Frank - what guidance do you give your patients with this prescription.
Tod - 26 Apr 2006 22:04 GMT
>> I am a contacts wearer with -2.25 and -2.75 and do find the difference
>> uncomfortable  if not with glasses. But I am thinking that one eye may need
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>frank

I see someone with a minor prescription in one eye and significant in the
other. Obviously he wears glasses all the time. If someone had a very mild
prescription like -1 what would be the maximum difference they could tolerate
before glasses became an everyday necessity?
Dan Abel - 27 Apr 2006 18:01 GMT
> I see someone with a minor prescription in one eye and significant in the
> other.

What, exactly, is "minor" and "significant"?

> Obviously he wears glasses all the time.

Obviously, he would *not* wear glasses.  They don't work.  People with a
big difference need to wear contacts.  The brain is unable to "fuse" the
images together.

>  If someone had a very mild
> prescription like -1 what would be the maximum difference they could tolerate
> before glasses became an everyday necessity?

My eye doctor told me that a difference in refractive need between the
two eyes of 2D often caused problems with wearing glasses.

Signature

Dan Abel
dabel@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA

Tod - 27 Apr 2006 21:12 GMT
>> I see someone with a minor prescription in one eye and significant in the
>> other.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>My eye doctor told me that a difference in refractive need between the
>two eyes of 2D often caused problems with wearing glasses.

Actually he *does* wear glasses - one lense has hardly any prescription, the
other a very strong one that sticks out behind the plastic frames.

You misunderstood my 2nd question -  I meant if someone had a -1 prescription
in one eye and something stronger in the other, what would the prescription
in the other eye need to be before it was necessary to correct it fulltime?
ie how much difference can you go with?
Dan Abel - 28 Apr 2006 21:20 GMT
> >> I see someone with a minor prescription in one eye and significant in the
> >> other.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> in the other eye need to be before it was necessary to correct it fulltime?
> ie how much difference can you go with?

You're right, I don't understand.  Somebody with a big difference
*cannot* wear glasses and have binocular vision.  I've been there and
done that.

Signature

Dan Abel
dabel@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.