Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Purevision Multifocals?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MS - 18 Apr 2006 01:16 GMT
Are they available yet?

(I see them advertised online already, at:
http://www.aclens.com/displaylens.asp?LensID=290
I know that online ads can be deceptive though--advertising something not in
stock yet.)

Has anyone reading this had any experience with them yet, either as patient
or prescriber? If so, please describe how well they have worked for you or
your patients. Thank you.
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 18 Apr 2006 04:29 GMT
i have been using them for approximately 1 month (both as a doctor and
as a sporadic wearer).

i think they have a similar design to the soflens multifocal, although,
like the torics, their diameter is 14mm rather than 14.5mm.  they come
in both 'low' and "high" bifocal powers.  personally i have many
multifocal patients who are interested in extended wear so i like these
contacts and will probably use them a fair amount.

comfort is OK (not as good as AV Oasys IMHO) and the optics are typical
of a multifocal.
CatmanX - 18 Apr 2006 13:33 GMT
Yeah, yeah, yeah, but Oasys is an upgrade on Advance. PureVision has an
upgrade coming out sometime and I hope that will be better.

The soflens 66 MF was a pretty good design but crappy material.
Hopefully, the better material should fix things.

It is not yet commercially available from what I am told but will be
soon.

dr grant
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 18 Apr 2006 13:58 GMT
> The soflens 66 MF was a pretty good design but crappy material.
> Hopefully, the better material should fix things.

soflens multifocal is not the 66 material but is polymacon (38%).  i
think polymacon is underrated as a material.  it is quite comfortable
for many people, quite durable, and doesn't get dirty quickly like many
other plastics.  however, it sucks for EW.

> It is not yet commercially available from what I am told but will be
> soon.

well i have been ordering it in trials for over a month.  in all
powers.
except for the EW aspect of the material i don't see much difference
over the SL multifocals.

i was not aware that an upgraded Purevision material is on the way.  i
look forward to it.

anyone heard of SiHy lenses coming from Ocular Sciences/Cooper anytime
soon?
doctor_my_eye@msn.com - 18 Apr 2006 17:52 GMT
Cooper has more faith in their PCh material  (Proclear) and they spend
a lot of time trash-talking anout any silicone hydrogel.  The
CooperVision XC ("Extended Comfort") is an aspheric soft lens that
takes the Proclear technology "toe to toe" with Oasys and Purevision.
I've only fit a few so far, but patients seem to love it.
Beermonster - 19 Apr 2006 05:12 GMT
> Cooper has more faith in their PCh material  (Proclear) and they spend
> a lot of time trash-talking anout any silicone hydrogel.  The
> CooperVision XC ("Extended Comfort") is an aspheric soft lens that
> takes the Proclear technology "toe to toe" with Oasys and Purevision.
> I've only fit a few so far, but patients seem to love it.

Well, omafilcon, hioxifilcon, and similar will deliver perhaps 90-95% of the
corneal oxygen needs.for a daily wear modality. EW is a different game
altogether.
It will be interesting to see how Coopers change their stance once their
Biofinity silicone lens is launched into the US (Dk = 128)
CatmanX - 19 Apr 2006 05:56 GMT
You can bet they will bring the proclear MF out in Biofinity pretty
soon as long as the material shows any promise.

dr grant
Beermonster - 19 Apr 2006 07:47 GMT
The Biofinity looks to be the silicone hydrogel OSI were developing prior to
them being acquired by CVI. Doesnt look like a sniff of PC anywhere in it
according to the 510k summary

> You can bet they will bring the proclear MF out in Biofinity pretty
> soon as long as the material shows any promise.
>
> dr grant
CatmanX - 19 Apr 2006 09:08 GMT
Yes, it is the OSI material. The question is whether it will perform as
well or better than Proclear and the SiH lenses currently available.

grant
doctor_my_eye@msn.com - 18 Apr 2006 17:57 GMT
The Purevision Multifocal behaves much better than the old 66 percent
hema crap that the original multifocal comes in.  The larger diameter
and 8.7 BC are based on the premise that the two base curves of the old
hema aren't needed anymore as the new uniparameter silicone hydrogel
has a "modulus" aka stiffness that allows more of a rigid lens
relationship with the cornea than the old "suction cup" fit of the 66.
Maybe.

Uniparameter has always meant "its cheaper to make this way" in my book.
LarryDoc - 18 Apr 2006 21:27 GMT
1. Purevision Multifocal:  Became available here last month. I wear it
and have dispensed them to patients. IMHO, best mulitfocal soft lens out
there thusfar. Optics are superior to similar designs in HEMMA plastics.

2. Coopervision plans to release their Biofinity silicone lens in
spheres and torics to practitioners mid June with patient lenses
available end of June or beginning of July.

3. Polymacon may be a durable, deposit resistant material, but it also
has the lowest oxygen permeability of any commonly used soft lens
material. IMHO, this circa 1972 material has NO place in modern contact
lenses. At all. Period.

4. Coopervision's omafilcon (Proclear) material, now being used across
their product line is a great plastic for patients with dry-ish eyes and
has one of the best oxygen transmission profiles of the non-silicone
soft lenses. That material, and the hioxifilcon plastic represent the
best of the current generation (not counting silicone hydrogels) lenses.
I think Coopervision is positioning itself appropriately for the contact
lens market in 2006. Finally.

note: I have no financial interest (except perhaps in mutual funds) in
the mentioned companies.

LB, O.D.
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 18 Apr 2006 21:36 GMT
> 3. Polymacon may be a durable, deposit resistant material, but it also
> has the lowest oxygen permeability of any commonly used soft lens
> material. IMHO, this circa 1972 material has NO place in modern contact
> lenses. At all. Period.

i hear you.  its not my favorite either, but if you don't overwear them
they work fine!  no need to have the highest spec'd Dk material if the
patient takes their lenses out after 12 hours.  i have lots of patients
who LOVE polymacon and don't like SiHy lenses.  and since they don't
abuse the lenses and their corneas are healthy why should i protest?
and why should you protest?  at all?  period?

;)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.