Yeah, yeah, yeah, but Oasys is an upgrade on Advance. PureVision has an
upgrade coming out sometime and I hope that will be better.
The soflens 66 MF was a pretty good design but crappy material.
Hopefully, the better material should fix things.
It is not yet commercially available from what I am told but will be
soon.
dr grant
> The soflens 66 MF was a pretty good design but crappy material.
> Hopefully, the better material should fix things.
soflens multifocal is not the 66 material but is polymacon (38%). i
think polymacon is underrated as a material. it is quite comfortable
for many people, quite durable, and doesn't get dirty quickly like many
other plastics. however, it sucks for EW.
> It is not yet commercially available from what I am told but will be
> soon.
well i have been ordering it in trials for over a month. in all
powers.
except for the EW aspect of the material i don't see much difference
over the SL multifocals.
i was not aware that an upgraded Purevision material is on the way. i
look forward to it.
anyone heard of SiHy lenses coming from Ocular Sciences/Cooper anytime
soon?
doctor_my_eye@msn.com - 18 Apr 2006 17:52 GMT
Cooper has more faith in their PCh material (Proclear) and they spend
a lot of time trash-talking anout any silicone hydrogel. The
CooperVision XC ("Extended Comfort") is an aspheric soft lens that
takes the Proclear technology "toe to toe" with Oasys and Purevision.
I've only fit a few so far, but patients seem to love it.
Beermonster - 19 Apr 2006 05:12 GMT
> Cooper has more faith in their PCh material (Proclear) and they spend
> a lot of time trash-talking anout any silicone hydrogel. The
> CooperVision XC ("Extended Comfort") is an aspheric soft lens that
> takes the Proclear technology "toe to toe" with Oasys and Purevision.
> I've only fit a few so far, but patients seem to love it.
Well, omafilcon, hioxifilcon, and similar will deliver perhaps 90-95% of the
corneal oxygen needs.for a daily wear modality. EW is a different game
altogether.
It will be interesting to see how Coopers change their stance once their
Biofinity silicone lens is launched into the US (Dk = 128)
CatmanX - 19 Apr 2006 05:56 GMT
You can bet they will bring the proclear MF out in Biofinity pretty
soon as long as the material shows any promise.
dr grant
Beermonster - 19 Apr 2006 07:47 GMT
The Biofinity looks to be the silicone hydrogel OSI were developing prior to
them being acquired by CVI. Doesnt look like a sniff of PC anywhere in it
according to the 510k summary
> You can bet they will bring the proclear MF out in Biofinity pretty
> soon as long as the material shows any promise.
>
> dr grant
CatmanX - 19 Apr 2006 09:08 GMT
Yes, it is the OSI material. The question is whether it will perform as
well or better than Proclear and the SiH lenses currently available.
grant
doctor_my_eye@msn.com - 18 Apr 2006 17:57 GMT
The Purevision Multifocal behaves much better than the old 66 percent
hema crap that the original multifocal comes in. The larger diameter
and 8.7 BC are based on the premise that the two base curves of the old
hema aren't needed anymore as the new uniparameter silicone hydrogel
has a "modulus" aka stiffness that allows more of a rigid lens
relationship with the cornea than the old "suction cup" fit of the 66.
Maybe.
Uniparameter has always meant "its cheaper to make this way" in my book.