>I am looking for advice on progressive lenses
>
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance for any replies
The problem is probably not in the Rx's, but in the quality of lens designs
and lens materials that are used. There is a huge difference in quality of
progressive lenses from the least expensive ones used by many optical
chains, to most expensive state of the art designs and materials.
Another possible problem is with the fitting. First the frame must be fitted
properly to your face. Then the lens must be cut and placed at the right
fitting height and pupil distance in the frame to obtain optimum reading
area.
Most likely the problem is a combination of poor (cheap) lens design and a
poor fitting.
The Nikon lenses are probably better quality lens designs than the ones you
were previously given, but most manufacturers make a wide variety of lens
models. I would try to find out the exact lens model and lens material you
had previously and post that information here. And find out the exact model
and material of the Nikon lens you are being offered. The information about
the lens material needs to include the exact refraction index (1.50, 1.59,
etc).
CatmanX - 13 Apr 2006 14:26 GMT
1) Sweet FA
2) What do you think? A subjective refraction is just that, does an
auto refractor give you any say in it?
3) Get your eyes tested properly and go with that Rx
4) Nikon lenses are generally not as good as the essilor lens. They are
the same company (essilor owns 50% of Nikon). The Panamic and ellipse
are both great lenses, the presio is good for some, but not generally
as good as the Essilor lenses.
dr grant