>> Then DON'T read it, dipstick!
>>
>> Simple, eh?
>
> I really don't read it, Mr. "dipstick's" counselor.
Bullshirt! If you didn't read it you'd not be aware of its content, about
which you are grizzling.
> And no it is not that simple to break the context of a discussion.
For you, perhaps -- how difficult can it be for normal people to press a
key?
> Next time keep your smart comments to yourself.
Next time, sonny, I shall post precisely as I please.
You may like it, or you may lump it!

Signature
Talpus Grumpus
John Yasar - 06 Apr 2006 23:14 GMT
> Bullshirt! If you didn't read it you'd not be aware of its content, about
> which you are grizzling.
As I am aware of the user, now I avoid it is what I meant smarty.
> For you, perhaps -- how difficult can it be for normal people to press a
> key?
I can sit and challenge your "normal" wits all you want, though tell me
who else curses here I avoid them also...
> Next time, sonny, I shall post precisely as I please.
>
> You may like it, or you may lump it!
Something about vision, I shall check out maybe, something about your
shirt, will be skipped.
Doogle - 10 Apr 2006 16:58 GMT
I will as soon as that son of a **** Neil Brooks stops being a quack
otisbrown@pa.net - 10 Apr 2006 17:49 GMT
Dear Doogle,
Subject: Selective memory for profanity on sci.med.vision
Ace posted a number of honest questions about
the eye's behavior.
Dr. Grant did not like Ace's question so he
used extreme profanity on him.
Yours was relatively mind, since you used ****,
for the "sensitive" readers.
So John should object more to Dr. Grant,
who should know better.
Best,
Otis
> I will as soon as that son of a **** Neil Brooks stops being a quack
The Central Scrutinizer - 10 Apr 2006 18:07 GMT
>Ace posted a number of honest questions about
>the eye's behavior.
I POSTED ONE TO YOU TOO - and you ignored it several times, and then
just dodged it and told me to find my own answer. YOU should know
better than that.
Selective memory indeed.
Hypocrite.
The Central Scrutinizer - 10 Apr 2006 18:30 GMT
>Ace posted a number of honest questions about
>the eye's behavior.
I POSTED ONE TO YOU TOO - and you ignored it several times, and then
just dodged it and told me to find my own answer. YOU should know
better than that.
Selective memory indeed.
Hypocrite.
Dan Abel - 11 Apr 2006 01:01 GMT
> Dear Doogle,
>
> Subject: Selective memory for profanity on sci.med.vision
>
> Ace posted a number of honest questions about
> the eye's behavior.
Ace posted a number of dishonest anwers.
> Dr. Grant did not like Ace's question so he
> used extreme profanity on him.
Dr. Grant is very rude. I think he reflects quite poorly on ODs.
> Yours was relatively mind, since you used ****,
> for the "sensitive" readers.
>
> So John should object more to Dr. Grant,
> who should know better.
The obvious fact that Dr. Grant is rude and crude doesn't justify others
copying him.

Signature
Dan Abel
dabel@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA
Quick - 11 Apr 2006 01:15 GMT
> Dr. Grant is very rude. I think he reflects quite poorly
> on ODs.
I'm on the downhill side of old. When it comes to
medical matters I'm of the opinion that bedside
manners are highly overated.
-Quick
The Real Bev - 11 Apr 2006 01:57 GMT
>> Dr. Grant is very rude. I think he reflects quite poorly
>> on ODs.
>
> I'm on the downhill side of old. When it comes to
> medical matters I'm of the opinion that bedside
> manners are highly overated.
I'm not sure which side of the hill I'm on, but I'd be much happier to
find snarling competent docs who could actually fix me. I have family
and friends to hold my hand.
My nice friendly GP/internist just retired and sold me to one of his
partners. I'd rather see a different partner, but that might be
considered a breach of ethics by the different partner. Don't we
objects have anything to say about who owns us?
As soon as Medicare comes through I'm going doc-shopping. It's not like
I have to see one every five years...

Signature
Cheers,
Bev
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
"If you put the government in charge of the desert, there would
be a sand shortage within ten years." -- M. Friedman (?)
John Yasar - 14 Apr 2006 04:01 GMT
> So John should object more to Dr. Grant,
> who should know better.
I don't even know Dr. Grant, I am going to react to what I see here...