Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

TO DOOGLE:

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Yasar - 04 Apr 2006 09:44 GMT
Can you please cut down on the profanity a little, I DO NOT WANT TO READ IT.
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 04 Apr 2006 20:26 GMT
Same goes for Dr. Grant who cusses like a sailor!
Neil Brooks - 04 Apr 2006 21:14 GMT
> Same goes for Dr. Grant who cusses like a sailor!

I imagine that Dr. Grant might be willing to make a deal with you.  I
imagine that he might stop cussing on this site if you would

1) stop injecting yourself into conversations where you are uninformed
or misinformed

2) provide citations to reputable sources for the information that you
do provide

3) declare in each post to a newcomer on this site that you are "not a
doctor"

Why don't you propose this to him and see what he says.  Frankly, he
seems like a reasonable bloke to me.
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 05 Apr 2006 04:41 GMT
He cusses at almost everyone. Yes he helps from time to time, but he
has alot of anger inside him. I guess his job and life is stressful so
he lets it out here
Nicolaas Hawkins - 05 Apr 2006 07:18 GMT
> Can you please cut down on the profanity a little, I DO NOT WANT TO READ IT.

Then DON'T read it, dipstick!

Simple, eh?

Signature

Talpus Grumpus

John Yasar - 06 Apr 2006 16:52 GMT
> Then DON'T read it, dipstick!
>
> Simple, eh?

I really don't read it, Mr. "dipstick's" counselor. And no it is not
that simple to break the context of a discussion. Next time keep your
smart comments to yourself.
Nicolaas Hawkins - 06 Apr 2006 20:04 GMT
>> Then DON'T read it, dipstick!
>>
>> Simple, eh?
>
> I really don't read it, Mr. "dipstick's" counselor.

Bullshirt!  If you didn't read it you'd not be aware of its content, about
which you are grizzling.

> And no it is not that simple to break the context of a discussion.

For you, perhaps -- how difficult can it be for normal people to press a
key?

> Next time keep your smart comments to yourself.

Next time, sonny, I shall post precisely as I please.  

You may like it, or you may lump it!

Signature

Talpus Grumpus

John Yasar - 06 Apr 2006 23:14 GMT
> Bullshirt!  If you didn't read it you'd not be aware of its content, about
> which you are grizzling.

As I am aware of the user, now I avoid it is what I meant smarty.

> For you, perhaps -- how difficult can it be for normal people to press a
> key?

I can sit and challenge your "normal" wits all you want, though tell me
who else curses here I avoid them also...

> Next time, sonny, I shall post precisely as I please.  
>
> You may like it, or you may lump it!

Something about vision, I shall check out maybe, something about your
shirt, will be skipped.
Doogle - 10 Apr 2006 16:58 GMT
I will as soon as that son of a  **** Neil Brooks stops being a quack
otisbrown@pa.net - 10 Apr 2006 17:49 GMT
Dear Doogle,

Subject:  Selective memory for profanity on sci.med.vision

Ace posted a number of honest questions about
the eye's behavior.

Dr. Grant did not like Ace's question so he
used extreme profanity on him.

Yours was relatively mind, since you used ****,
for the "sensitive" readers.

So John should object more to Dr. Grant,
who should know better.

Best,

Otis

> I will as soon as that son of a  **** Neil Brooks stops being a quack
The Central Scrutinizer - 10 Apr 2006 18:07 GMT
>Ace posted a number of honest questions about
>the eye's behavior.

I POSTED ONE TO YOU TOO - and you ignored it several times, and then
just dodged it and told me to find my own answer. YOU should know
better than that.

Selective memory indeed.

Hypocrite.
The Central Scrutinizer - 10 Apr 2006 18:30 GMT
>Ace posted a number of honest questions about
>the eye's behavior.

I POSTED ONE TO YOU TOO - and you ignored it several times, and then
just dodged it and told me to find my own answer. YOU should know
better than that.

Selective memory indeed.

Hypocrite.
Dan Abel - 11 Apr 2006 01:01 GMT
> Dear Doogle,
>
> Subject:  Selective memory for profanity on sci.med.vision
>
> Ace posted a number of honest questions about
> the eye's behavior.

Ace posted a number of dishonest anwers.

> Dr. Grant did not like Ace's question so he
> used extreme profanity on him.

Dr. Grant is very rude.  I think he reflects quite poorly on ODs.

> Yours was relatively mind, since you used ****,
> for the "sensitive" readers.
>
> So John should object more to Dr. Grant,
> who should know better.

The obvious fact that Dr. Grant is rude and crude doesn't justify others
copying him.

Signature

Dan Abel
dabel@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA

Quick - 11 Apr 2006 01:15 GMT
> Dr. Grant is very rude.  I think he reflects quite poorly
> on ODs.

I'm on the downhill side of old. When it comes to
medical matters I'm of the opinion that bedside
manners are highly overated.

-Quick
The Real Bev - 11 Apr 2006 01:57 GMT
>> Dr. Grant is very rude.  I think he reflects quite poorly
>> on ODs.
>
> I'm on the downhill side of old. When it comes to
> medical matters I'm of the opinion that bedside
> manners are highly overated.

I'm not sure which side of the hill I'm on, but I'd be much happier to
find snarling competent docs who could actually fix me.  I have family
and friends to hold my hand.

My nice friendly GP/internist just retired and sold me to one of his
partners.  I'd rather see a different partner, but that might be
considered a breach of ethics by the different partner.  Don't we
objects have anything to say about who owns us?

As soon as Medicare comes through I'm going doc-shopping.  It's not like
I have to see one every five years...

Signature

Cheers,
Bev
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
"If you put the government in charge of the desert, there would
 be a sand shortage within ten years."       -- M. Friedman (?)

John Yasar - 14 Apr 2006 04:01 GMT
> So John should object more to Dr. Grant,
> who should know better.

I don't even know Dr. Grant, I am going to react to what I see here...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.