Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

High Perscription and "big eyes"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ellis22@gmail.com - 26 Mar 2006 17:45 GMT
My left eye is +5.25 and right +5.50, I got the thinnest possible
lenses they had 1.74 qith anti glare coating and also small frames, my
eyes look big in them, I tried pushing them near my face more and they
still look big, is the only way to solve this with contacts?, and do
they make  contacts in my perscription?.

Many Thanks
Ellis.
Neil Brooks - 26 Mar 2006 17:48 GMT
elli...@gmail.com wrote:
> My left eye is +5.25 and right +5.50, I got the thinnest possible
> lenses they had 1.74 qith anti glare coating and also small frames, my
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Many Thanks
> Ellis.

Yes ... and yes.  My prescription is higher than yours and I have
astigmatism, too.  Contacts are your friend.

Please don't push your eyes any closer to your face than they were
'designed' to sit.  You are, unwittingly, changing (weakening) your
prescription by doing this.  It may never cause you problems ... or it
might.
Neil Brooks - 26 Mar 2006 17:49 GMT
> elli...@gmail.com wrote:
> > My left eye is +5.25 and right +5.50, I got the thinnest possible
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Please don't push your eyes any closer to your face than they were

Sorry.  I meant "don't push your GLASSES any closer...."

> 'designed' to sit.  You are, unwittingly, changing (weakening) your
> prescription by doing this.  It may never cause you problems ... or it
> might.
ellis22@gmail.com - 26 Mar 2006 18:01 GMT
Thanks Neil, I will look into contacts then. Don't worry I won't push
them any more :p.

Regards
Ellis.
Simon Dean - 27 Mar 2006 21:32 GMT
> elli...@gmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Yes ... and yes.  My prescription is higher than yours and I have
> astigmatism, too.  Contacts are your friend.

Hey, I must just ask... stupid question maybe... but... this
prescription is, erm, essentially reading glasses right? to see up
close? For long sighted people? Like me?

So how would contacts help?

I mean, I can't see distance clearly with my glasses on, but close up,
Im fine. I don't much fancy the idea of having to take out and put in
contacts everytime I want to, walk up the street, or go out for a drive...

I've heard you do adjust, but I had enough adjusting. Just couldn't keep
them on long enough to do anything!

Cya
Simon
Dan Abel - 27 Mar 2006 23:16 GMT
> > elli...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> I've heard you do adjust, but I had enough adjusting. Just couldn't keep
> them on long enough to do anything!

It's not a stupid question, but there are two separate issues here.  
Reading glasses (and +5 aren't reading glasses) are for people who have
lost the ability to focus.  I assume these lenses are for someone who
needs them for normal vision.

If they have normal accommodation, then the contacts will just
substitute for the glasses that they wear full time.

If they have lost the ability to focus in addition, that is another
issue.  One solution is to wear the contacts full time, and wear reading
glasses over them for close work.

Signature

Dan Abel
dabel@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA

Simon Dean - 27 Mar 2006 23:24 GMT
>>>elli...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> lost the ability to focus.  I assume these lenses are for someone who
> needs them for normal vision.

Ok, well, what if I reword the question then. I have these:

Right +0.50 Sph, -0.75 Cyl, 135 Axis
Left +0.75 Sph, -0.50 Cyl, 35 Axis

> If they have normal accommodation, then the contacts will just
> substitute for the glasses that they wear full time.

Im mostly normal, but close vision is a tad blurry at times, but these
glasses really do bring everything into immaculately sharp focus.

But I can't use them for distance vision, because it's just too blurry.

So im unable to wear my particular set of glasses full time. Should I be
able to?

(PS Im 28)./

Cheers
Simon
The Real Bev - 27 Mar 2006 06:59 GMT
> My left eye is +5.25 and right +5.50, I got the thinnest possible
> lenses they had 1.74 qith anti glare coating and also small frames, my
> eyes look big in them, I tried pushing them near my face more and they
> still look big, is the only way to solve this with contacts?, and do
> they make  contacts in my perscription?.

What's wrong with big eyes?  When I started wearing contacts after 20 years
of glasses I was horrified to find that I had little squinty eyes.  I was
also taller than I had thought...

Signature

Cheers,
Bev
-----------------------------------------
There's something wrong with my keyboard.
Whenever I type x I get x.

Dan Abel - 27 Mar 2006 08:42 GMT
> > My left eye is +5.25 and right +5.50, I got the thinnest possible
> > lenses they had 1.74 qith anti glare coating and also small frames, my
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> of glasses I was horrified to find that I had little squinty eyes.  I was
> also taller than I had thought...

I think I've posted my own experience before.  I wore very strong minus
lenses for 35 years.  I didn't switch to contacts for cosmetic reasons,
but medical reasons.  Still, I got rid of those little beady eyes I had
been showing the world for 35 years, and substituted my natural big blue
eyes.  Many people told me that I looked much better.

In the fiction stories, the villain always has little beady eyes, and
the heroine always has big blue eyes.

I think Bev is right.

But if it really bothers you, then yes, contacts are the way to fix it.

A question for the opticians:  Do thinner lenses help that much anyway?  
I can't imagine they help with eye size (as above), since they are the
same power.  Are they any lighter?

Signature

Dan Abel
dabel@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA

acemanvx@yahoo.com - 27 Mar 2006 08:48 GMT
nothing wrong with trying contacts, if you dont like them you can go
back to glasses. dont worry what others think of you. If they make fun,
just ignore them
Dom - 27 Mar 2006 11:01 GMT
> A question for the opticians:  Do thinner lenses help that much anyway?  
> I can't imagine they help with eye size (as above), since they are the
> same power.  Are they any lighter?

Magnification has more to do with the curves of the lenses rather than
the thickness. Having said that, different curves can result in
different thicknesses. And you can't eliminate magnification, just
reduce it a bit.

Are thinner lenses lighter? Yes.

Dom
Dan Abel - 27 Mar 2006 18:47 GMT
> > A question for the opticians:  Do thinner lenses help that much anyway?  
> > I can't imagine they help with eye size (as above), since they are the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> different thicknesses. And you can't eliminate magnification, just
> reduce it a bit.

Yes, thickness has quite a bit to do with power.  At one time, I was
-12D with 1.75D of astigmatism.  It doesn't matter how thin the middle
is, the edges are unbelievably thick.  I argued with the optician about
getting smaller lenses and frames, knowing this.  He flat out stated
that I wouldn't be happy with smaller ones, so I got these monsters.  
Needless to say, I wasn't happy with them.

> Are thinner lenses lighter? Yes.

That's good.  Not only were those glasses horribly thick, but they were
correspondingly heavy.  I can't imagine how thick and heavy they would
have been if they weren't high index.

Signature

Dan Abel
dabel@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA


Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.